/classical/

Best romantic edition
>General Folder #1. Renaissance up to 20th century/modern classical. Also contains a folder of live recordings/recitals by some outstanding performers.
mega.co.nz/#F!mMYGhBgY!Ee_a6DJvLJRGej-9GBqi0A
>General Folder #2. Mostly 20th century/modern with other assorted bits and pieces
mega.co.nz/#F!Y8pXlJ7L!RzSeyGemu6QdvYzlfKs67w
>General Folder #3. Renaissance up to early/mid-20th century. Also contains a folder of Scarlatti sonate and another live recording/recital folder.
mega.co.nz/#F!kMpkFSzL!diCUavpSn9B-pr-MfKnKdA
>General Folder #4. Renaissance up to late 19th century
mega.co.nz/#F!ekBFiCLD!spgz8Ij5G0SRH2JjXpnjLg
>General Folder #5. Very eclectic mix
mega.co.nz/#F!O8pj1ZiL!mAfQOneAAMlDlrgkqvzfEg
>General Folder #6. Yellow Piss stuff. Also there's some other stuff in here.
mega.nz/#F!DlRSjQaS!SzxR-CUyK4AYPknI1LYgdg
>Renaissance Folder #1. Mass settings
mega.co.nz/#F!ygImCRjS!1C9L77tCcZGQRF6UVXa-dA
>Renaissance Folder #2. Motets and madrigals (plus Leiden choirbooks)
mega.co.nz/#F!il5yBShJ!WPT0v8GwCAFdOaTYOLDA1g
>Debussy Folder.
mega.co.nz/#F!DdJWUBBK!BeGdGaiAqdLy9SBZjCHjCw
>Opera Folder. Contains recorded video productions of about 10 well-known operas, with a bias towards late Romantic
mega.co.nz/#F!4EVlnJrB!PRjPFC0vB2UT1vrBHAlHlw
>Book Folder #1. Random assortment of books on music theory and composition, music history etc.
mega.nz/#F!HsAVXT5C!AoFKwCXr4PJnrNg5KzDJjw
>Book Folder #2. Comprehensive list of the most important harpsichord and piano pieces through history
mega.nz/#F!1xJgVSLA!i2eLakjehx5DY8qYUzS0Zg
>Book Folder #3. Harmony, Composition, Counterpoint and Orchestration
mega.nz/#F!2k9VgKob!5N3Kwf0RIQeayYcA4XvRyg

Previous

Attached: schubert.jpg (108x144, 2.98K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=P8SvzOcB0iI
youtu.be/m_hMVzPT9f4
youtube.com/watch?v=VI7WBFPqTWg
youtube.com/watch?v=WL2l6bJO64k
voca.ro/4jS6WZyqtx9
youtube.com/watch?v=czKla3t6u0s
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Operafags eternally BTFO

Attached: topkeko.png (1339x273, 100.36K)

>BANG BANG BANG BANG
What is wrong with G*rman composers?

Classical era and romantic era are the worst periods. Medieval, renaissance, baroque and 20th century are all better, more subtle and less prone to tropes. Only plebs will disagree.

>20th century

Attached: dissapoint.jpg (450x372, 26.55K)

Yes.

>I-V I-V I-V I-V
>DUM DUM BANG BANG
>muh emotions

Attached: Beethoven.jpg (1200x1443, 1.03M)

>20th century
*squeek* *squeek* *squeek*
"Man, I sure am innovative."

based edition
youtube.com/watch?v=P8SvzOcB0iI

Man, you sure are retarded.

I made a thing. What do you think so far? Is it accurate?

Attached: doomzoombloomboom.jpg (750x794, 269.48K)

>Wagner
>zoomer

>wanted to revolutionise art in insane ways, anti-capitalist, whoring around and bad with money
>not a zoomer
Where would you put him?

wojackposters should be shot on shight

ok frogposter

Beethovencucks are the fucking worst, most boring people ever. Anything that breaks boundaries is silly to them.

>beethoven not in the centre.
>no Prokofiev in boomer/bloomer territory
>not putting Gershwin in Bloomer

Beethoven is the first romantic stereotypical "suffering artist" though and not putting him in the doomer category is silly. I'll add Prokofiev and Gershwin though because I agree with you there.

Stop posting rage comics

Return to r*ddit

youtu.be/m_hMVzPT9f4

Schönberg(pbuh)

Wojak has always been and will always be a forced as fuck meme.

All memes are cringy and forced, bro.

It's either boomers or zoomers who like Wagner, and considering zoomers interests are hot and heavy I'd say it's safer to put him in zoomer.

Also shouldn''t Liszt be evidently more boomer?

Where would you place Vivaldi, Rossini, Puccini, Verdi, Bruckner, Tchaikovsky, Szymanowski, Adams, Ades?

I don't care who listens to them, I'm basing this off of their personalities and compositions. Liszt was very innovative, but was very religious so yeah maybe I'll slide him down a bit. Good point.
I'll think about it. Vivaldi is definitely a bloomer and Tchaikovsky is definitely a doomer firstly.

Imagine thinking Bach was a bloomer

this is "everything but rap and country" for classical music.

youtube.com/watch?v=VI7WBFPqTWg

All (good) Christians are bloomers, their utopia awaits them at the end of time and history.

>All (good) Christians are bloomers, their utopia awaits them at the end of time and history.
That's only Christian in the traditional sense, Wagner was a Christian --a modern one-- and was not hopeful.

>Wagner was a Christian
Hardly, barely.

That's why I said in the modern sense, or ideal of the word. Which remains, fundamentally spiritually Christian.

And not just by unaltered repeating ethical structures but a much more conscious religion as is traditionally Christian! Different, but only a difference of modern reaction to Christianity.

Literally everything bach did was devouted to his religion, he's no wagner

The only classical thing I've really heard was Dvorak's New World Symphony which is some really basic shit. I love it, and want more
Any classic recs?

You have already reached the epitome of classical music. It's only downhill from here

It's really perfect isn't it?

this nigga looks like a guy who works at best buy

He's also the god of tonality

tastelet

Reger
youtube.com/watch?v=WL2l6bJO64k

>pastiche
Nonsense. I wrote what I wanted. I didn’t hold myself to any expectation of style or period. But once the first few bars were written the piece had a character that had to be loosely maintained.
>cliche sequences
You act like this is something to be avoided and not something to be earned
>tracings of Beethoven
I detest this accusation. I’ve never studied a score in my entire life.
>literally, and I shit you not, pulls the “find your own voice” meme.
You don’t find your voice. Your voice finds you. If you try to “find your voice” you’ll just latch on to some boring, meaningless list of things that you thinks makes you special and different even though all it does it take away from what you actually wanted to say. I’ve seen it happen several times with friends.

Face it. Something being “new” and “unique” doesn't make up for it being bad.

Minuet I wrote voca.ro/4jS6WZyqtx9
I'm not the user who usually post these btw

Attached: 20200325_162814.jpg (1023x779, 201.03K)

Eroica next then

Mahler 6

I can't respect a man who died of syphilis, he slept with a prostitute instead of being a proud incel, he destroyed his career dying at 31 in his prime for sex

Mahler 5

Stepping in to this conversation, I went in prepared to dislike polys music, but I actually preferred his fugue to the other examples cross-thread, it felt coherent enough, I don't know where the accusations of atonality came from, the half I listened to sounded entirely tonal.

Interestingly enough, and the only reason I am making this post, is that I listened to his suite afterwards. Its real bad, I only got a minute in. There's some player piano stuff that sounds like it belongs in circus galop, and sudden quirky rhythm changes for the hell of it. So now I don't know what to think.

Dvorak might be normie fodder but it fucking rocks. Now THAT is originality. The symphony can not be mistaken for anything else, AND it knocks your socks off.

Judge people by their best works, not by their worst

why has no one mentioned that Chausson is a less shitty Ravel
youtube.com/watch?v=czKla3t6u0s

Mozart has better fugues than Bach

Attached: 1584974497229.jpg (1200x675, 41.52K)

>romanticfags

Attached: 1548713773834.jpg (400x400, 18.89K)

why

why are Mahler, Schoenberg, Beethoven, and Chopin doomer?

woah... pbuh indeed...

Based on their music and personality? What else would they be?

Dumb frogposter

Bach's are kinda boring desu, Mozart has more emphasis on form and melody making them more enjoyable pieces.

Brahms 4

Why were the Dutch and English so shit at classical despite their wealth and prosperity? Is it a religious thing?

Capitalism and wealth generate poor art.

How do you explain the Italians then

Most important female in classical coming through.

Attached: Kassia.jpg (1021x1205, 281.97K)