Wow so “experimental”
Wow so “experimental”
what are the 2 albums on the bottom?
Basically yeah
stfu onkyo tranny
Death Grips
Based and redpilled.
based RYM tranny
what is the last album?
experimental or not, the point of music is it should sound good which Faust doesn't.
IF YOU LIKE THIS THING YOU HAVE TO LIKE THIS OTHER THING. THEY'RE THE SAME.
on rym yeah
fucking love solo violin improvisations, I actually own it on vinyl
why do RYM spergs fixate on Good Morning Good Night so much? it's just average EAI
>the point of music is it should sound good
no it shouldn't it simply is and we define it based on our sense of reason
There it is.
An actual fedora poster.
Go ahead, have the last word.. I'm done lol.
Gravitarararrarar, and mcfaggit's Uncanney Valley
classical is more experimental than both of these
Faust is the only good album there
Gravitar is seriously one of the best bands. All their albums are 10/10.
alright retard ill put it in laymen's terms for your dumbass. Music doesn't need to sound good thats subjective
>music HAS to sound good! music HAS to be a product for me to consoom! i need funfunfun, NOW!!!
I mean, the literal definition of 'music' expects it to have 'beauty of form'.
Now go ahead and attack the source I used, since you can no longer refute, little soi-cattle.
1. your source is garbage, you pointing out ill attack it doesnt change that. 2. even so, its not wrong, because 'beauty of form' is a subjective term without definition, and does not in fact mean it has to be fun.
>'beauty of form' is a subjective term
oh, to be a literal retard.. I envy you.
>literal
you have an argument to back up whatever claim youre making or do you just give up?
>pleasant sounds bad.. complex, weird sounds good!
thank yu
>OMG FAUST
>music HAS to sound good! music HAS to be a product for me to consoom! i need funfunfun, NOW!!!
what is the point of listening to music that sounds (objectively) bad, just because its complex or experimental or whatever doesnt mean its good. i could eat a pile of bull feces, yes, itd be unique and """experimental""" but its still shit.
we've come full circle
>"Now go ahead and attack the source I used"
its absolute shit
unless you have some tools or scales with which you measure the value of art that i dont know about, i cant see how anything is objective about that.
so then what is the entire point of both of your arguments. if music is COMPLETELY subjective then you are both right.
i dont think so. the arguments origin was the other user saying that "the point of music is that it should sound good" which developed into "the point of music is it should be fun". if music is completely subjective, then these statements make no sense, because "good" and "fun" are subjective.
i still dont see much of a point but im too tired to really go in depth explaining a point right now. i think there really, in the end, isnt much objectivity in music and that even "experimental" music is subjective.
whats the Last album
What’s that piece of music?
Faust sounds great.
Daughters just sounds like a shitty version of The Jesus Lizard to me
faust is the most melody-playbook album on the bottom row lol
unironically listen to more music
it all makes sense in the end
What is that piece at the bottom?
Listen to more music pleb
It just keeps going round and round
you're a dumb fuckin nigger
No you are
bump
B A S E D
Avant-teen
>EAI
Based
wow actually based
This wojak is literally fantano lol
It is, in fact, just noise, not music.
If the experiment was to discover the boundaries of what can be recognized and enjoyed as music by neurologically and psychologically healthy individuals, it succeeded by finding a lot of shit that laid beyond them and not much that laid within them, more clearly illuminating the line of minimum beauty for future artists to avoid crossing unless unmusical noise is desired for its atmospheric quality.
Rhetoric especially of the pseudo-philosophical variety is a cancer
See: the entire postmodern left and the liberal right