Why did critics hate STP

>But Scott was considered to be just be aping Vedder
Critcis and magazines were idiots
Both Vedder and Weiland were inspired by Jim Morrison, especially Weiland in those years, Bowie little later on.
Fact is they were probably hated a little because they were cool musicians and more polite california boys who wanted to ride the grunge wave kind of by playing hard heavy riffs and shit, but Dean DeLeo was into a lot more than just zeppelin or sabbath i guess.
youtube.com/watch?v=kATVimQsJG8

Attached: stone-temple-pilots-scott-weiland-dean-deleo-madison-square-garden-1996-credit-getty-500609512@2000x1270.jpg (2000x1270, 3.27M)

>overtly masculine
sexy type thing literally mocks toxic macho masculinity
youtube.com/watch?v=3hCnZ4WNug4&feature=youtu.be&t=329

it's really surprising how people still don't know and talk shit about this band

didn't know how good they had it back in 91

their best album

Attached: 81YyQf1uumL._SL1425_.jpg (1425x1425, 358.62K)

Because they were from California. It's that simple.

>STP
>masculine

Sex Type Thing was a fairly blatant satire which the critics deliberately misinterepreted because it gave them another reason to shit on the band.

because no one ever listened

Attached: STONE_TEMPLE_PILOTS_SHANGRI-LA+DEE+DA-187373.jpg (500x485, 51.18K)

This album is great
The singles (Trippin on a Hole in a Paper Heart, Lady Picture Show) are some of STP’s best, and then there are deeper cuts like Adhesive that show a lot of depth

Critics always get it wrong and parrot each other

it wasn't only critics anyway