Assuming Nothing can not exist...

you are fucking stupid

Nothing does exist. Vast quantities of space are literally nothing. It is an absence of something like black is an absence of light. It doesn't mean black doesn't exist in of itself. Its also more worthwhile to think about the perspective on things that sense in extremely different ways or have even different perceptions all together like creatures that perceive electromagnetic signals. Or how plants can sense touch or even memorize sensations without a nervous system or brain.

Mmm... really only after it's observed and its wave function collapses. Until then, it's existing in a set of all possible states at once.

qoute me where nothing exists. space is made of :Outer space is not completely empty—it is a hard vacuum containing a low density of particles, predominantly a plasma of hydrogen and helium, as well as electromagnetic radiation, magnetic fields, neutrinos, dust, and cosmic rays. and don't tell me that energy can't be measured stop trying to argue the word "exists" you fucking troglodyte

Attached: 16D50EC5-928C-4E98-A595-A2F2DE838DCC.jpg (549x1077, 410.26K)

I have an iq of 130 last i checked

If a plant or other biological system is "measuring" classic observables, then from the "perspective" of the plant, one could argue that it causes the wave functions of observed things around it to collapse. Once you observe the plant in its state, it would limit the possible eigenstates of the entire system the plant has "observed", but that's not plant consciousness...that's just quantum behavior in action.

Looks like being able to identify patterns real well doesn't make you any better at being able to distinguish between "exists" and "is perceptible by non sentient objects"

... like replacing schrodinger's cat with a ficus.

If nothing can not exist then how do they perceive nothing, you troll.

the afterlife is real because otherwise it would be nothing and nothing does not exist
get fucked atheists

imgbox.com/HgHymGHb

or its just black

bump

In the same way that you currently can't perceive just how fucking stupid you sound right now.

I understand that this requires a high amount of intelligence to understand that nothing cannot exist and I'm sorry that you still believe that something can see nothing when it can't possibly exist. Have fun with your unicorns and manticores buddy.

Just wait until the day you become sand. Maybe then you will understand.

I get that you're being le epic edgy trole face man right now, but at least it's a thread that isn't the usual shit you see on here, kudos for that.

Dumb as you can't even prove YOU exist by your logic.

Yet you still say nothing cannot exist?

Is this schrodinger's autism? The fuck are you smoking dude.

no troll, i truly believe this.

if only he could think outside the box without being retarded

Camel crush rich right now. How does nothing not existing have anything to do with proving I exist. I can prove I exist by my senses. This goes hand in hand with other things existing and sensing(however little that may be)

OP is actually somehow accidentally right
And the best part is that the world's leading expert on the topic is unironically not even memeing this guy

Attached: david_chalmers_and_the_panpsychists.jpg (1280x720, 84.31K)

Energy is not alive, that's ridiculous

Or do you believe heat itself and rays of light have a form of consciousness?

That's nothing new. We've known about it for millennium.

Attached: 0_VWU8mj_rXlj9pQaW.jpg (800x359, 73.08K)

Known what

So what does the earth and the sun feel like doing for Carbon life today?

energy is not alive your a fucking retard

Everything has a soul. What soul do you have?

IQ of 130 and your still a fucking retard

I don't see where you are making valid argument against my theory.

Fire nearly meets the parameters of being alive. So is energy only alive if it's plugged into matter and meeting all of our arbitrary requirements? Living energy versus dead energy?

That's not a widely accepted point of view

You believe particles have a soul because they move? Would their souls cease to exist in an area of absolute zero Kelvin?

sorry I don’t know how to argue against the concept of energy having a soul

still havent reached absolute zero

It's a bad faith argument you've made

I didn't say energy has a soul, good day.

You didn't answer the questions

it wasnt directed at me just mentioning we still haven't reached absolute zero

fire isn’t made of cells, has no genetic code, doesn’t reproduce, doesn’t maintain a stable internal environment and has no homeostasis

Y'all gettin trolled.

Push all of the planets into the habitable zone. Divide and conquer.

enough for now

But how do we manipulate the spheres to have more surface area?

Mathematics should help. What is most efficient shape that maintains our requirements for homeostasis?

Good

Idk what this means

We haven't, but that doesn't mean something hasn't