Yes he fucking did.
"And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do ****something like that****, by injection inside or almost a cleaning?
"So it'd be interesting to check that."
bbc.co.uk
Do your research before you go mouthing off on the internet.
lets say thats true, does it make it better? standing their like a turd mumbling shit, like nuke the virus/tornado...
> And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside
You can read his words user.
It makes it slightly better only. He should not have been thinking out like that talking about something this serious in a press briefing. So only slightly better, though he shouldn't have said it at all.
Which part of "something like that" do you not understand? He is just drawing a comparison.
Like I say, I'm not a Trump supporter, but this was another example of the media convincing people he's said something that he hadn't, and then people getting angry off the back of that.
I didn't say anything about injecting disinfectant, buddy. I said he found out later that what he said was just irredeemably stupid, and that's what it was. If you want to try to justify it as not stupid, I'm not going to stop you, because bootlickers gonna bootlick, but you're wasting your time if you go that way, because he decided now that he was being sarcastic, remember? He was being stupid on purpose. Can't you tell Trump when is saying stupid things on purpose? No? Is it indistinguishable from the things he says the rest of the time?
>He said it would be good if the USA could develop a vaccine LIKE disinfectant.
He did not say that you fuckwit.
So if Trump didn't suggest injecting disinfectant, the idiot just thought he had invented the concept of vaccines? Ok...faggot.
>defending any politician
KYS
>I said he found out later that what he said was just irredeemably stupid, and that's what it was.
True, agreed.
>because bootlickers gonna bootlick
Already said I am not pro-Trump.
>he decided now that he was being sarcastic, remember?
This was a daft thing to do. He shouldn't have backtracked, he should have clarified what he meant.
Okay but it would be so much less embarrassing if he did, so can we all just agree to pretend he did that instead of saying what he said? I can't maintain the cognitive dissidence needed to hold on to my idea of Trump the genius with him having said that, so let's just retcon it to something less absurd, okay?