Esoteric redpills incoming, the mods keep trying to kill this so scrn cap asap

Esoteric redpills incoming, the mods keep trying to kill this so scrn cap asap.

Foreword:
It may go without saying that humans are Idolatrous creatures, certainly it can be seen both in the past and in modern times that we externalize our inner-concept of divinity and form of the material world an aspect we feel to be in reflection of such and can act as a focal point for the energetic mental exchange we call worship, that is to say the feeling or expression of reverence and adoration for a deity. In his history man in search of an adequate method of expression of the divine has depicted many creatures and states in the form of an idol, that is to say an image or representation of a god used as an object of worship. But throughout the course of this dictation we will be focusing our attention on a specific recurrent theme of Idolatry, one that crops up time and again in the pantheons, a singular entity worshiped and re-worshipped under a thousand different names by cultures both past and present.

I speak of course, of the Idolatry of the horned beast, stretching all the way back to Sumeria the Horned One can be seen depicted, the manner of his worship changing little.

Time and again we depict him, over and over we call his name, endlessly we sacrifice to him. The Horned Beast with a thousand names, the primeval king of gods.

The start of our journey lies in the ancient Semitic religions of Sumeria and Great Babylon. But before our journey is complete we shall step through history age after age, tracking the signature markings of the beast. Our quest will plunge us into the mists of time, into the very depths of the human psyche, straight into the belly of the beast itself.

Attached: m2.jpg (742x974, 263.38K)

- Moloch, the Canaanites and Moses the mass-executioner -

As starting places go the deities worshipped in the Canaanite region isn't a bad one, of the many and varied deities worshipped by these ancient Semitic religions none surely could be more infamous than that of Moloch [also known as Molech/Milcom/Malcam and oft abbreviated in inscription to MLK - worth noting here that Otto Eissfeldt in 1935 argued that mlk was a term for a type of fire sacrifice, and that it had actualy been reinterpreted as the name of a canaanite idol under Josiah in the 7th century, which was a reform to abolish the child sacrifice that had been occuring] who as well as being a god of the Canaanites is also belived to be Milcom, a god of the Ammonites. Moloch or the variation thereof translates to 'king, or great king' or other variations of that, which is also the title given to Baal and in turn Yhwh, now the reasoning for this is that the name of god was seen as to be too holy to be said aloud by any but the high priests and so a term that meant king was used instead as a form of reference. In any case the diety itself was asociated with the idea of child sacrifice by those that worshipped it, not only that but very specifically a sacrifice by fire. Now Moloch was depicted in Rabbinic Judaismnas a bull and incorporated some form of chamber or vessel that held the fire, or was a void heated by fire which could be seen as the 'belly of the beast' into which would be thrown the sons and daughters of the Canaanites and the Ammonites in an act of sacrifice and worship to Moloch. The children would pass through the flames into the belly of Moloch and thus be devoured by the beast. Multiple references to this, as well as the use of the vocalisation of 'Molek' can be found in the
masoretic text, notably Leviticus where it is written.

Leviticus 18:21 "And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD."
Leviticus 20:2: "Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones."

Which carries echo's of the incident known in hebrew as the 'Sin of the calf' whereupon having departed to Mt Sinai to commune with god, Moses returns to find the Israelites engaged in the act of worshipping the Idol of the golden calf, a bull, yet another horned beast, first mentioned in Exodus 32:4. Which seems to make the implication of the Israelites turning back to the worship of Moloch just as their anscestors did, before being brought to heel again by Moses and turned back to the light of god by his proclomation that thou shalt not worship the false idol, the horned beast. Even more interesting is the references to the Israelites making burnt offerings to the idol in Exodus 32:6

"So the next day the people rose early and sacrificed burnt offerings and presented fellowship offerings. Afterward they sat down to eat and drink and got up to indulge in revelry."

Burnt offerings to the horned beast, starting to seem familiar? the sacrifice by fire? Well it seems that Moses felt very strongly that they ought not fall back into the worshipping of the horned beast that he ordered the mass execution of the Idoltrous worshippers, as seen in Exodus 32:26-28:

"Moses stood in the gate of the camp, and said: 'Whosoever is on the LORD's side, let him come unto me.' And all the sons of Levi gathered themselves together unto him. And he said unto them: 'Thus saith the LORD, the God of Israel: Put ye every man his sword upon his thigh, and go to and fro from gate to gate throughout the camp, and slay every man his brother, and every man his companion, and every man his neighbour.' And the sons of Levi did according to the word of Moses; and there fell of the people that day about three thousand men."

But it doesn't end there, not at all, and here is where we shall briefly veer away from the bull motif and onto that of the ram. Now let's remember that Rabbinic Judaism depicted Moloch as a bronze statue heated with fire into which the sacrifices would be thrown. Which has been linked to reports by Greco-Roman authors regarding child sacrifice in Carthage to a deity known as 'Baal Hammon' the chief god of Carthage [also worshipped as 'Ba?al Qarnaim' to mean 'The Lord of two horns'], depicted as a bearded older man with curling ram's horns, he was belived to have achieved suprecemy as a chief god sometime around the fifth century BC [archaeological evidence of child sacrifice and inscriptions of MLK has been uncovered since the 1920's at Carthage, reinforcing the notion that MLK may be a technical term for child sacrifice by fire] It may be interesting to note that this deity shares many parreles with the greek titan Cronus who was well known for, you guessed it, devouring his children. Now the meaning of Baal or Ba'al is fairly well understood and refers back to the same meaning of Moloch and Baal and so on, the meaning of Hammon is less clear there exists two Phoenician inscriptions dedicated to El-Hammon, now we do know that El was equated with Cronus and so was Baal Hammon, so it is fairly possible there is a relation there. A connection with northwest Semitic '?amm?n' to mean 'Brazier' has also been put forward and as we think back to the process of MLK [that of tossing children into burning braziers as a form of sacrifical worship] it certainly does seem to make more sense that it would equate to something like 'Lord of the Brazier'. Though of course this is still and will probably remain a matter of great debate, a definitive pattern is emerging.

Cleitarchus [One of Alexander the greats historians] when paraphrasing a footnote to Plato's Republic describes a practise predating the fall of Carthage [146 BC] and is as follows:

'There stands in their midst a bronze statue of Kronos, its hands extended over a bronze brazier, the flames of which engulf the child. When the flames fall upon the body, the limbs contract and the open mouth seems almost to be laughing until the contracted body slips quietly into the brazier. Thus it is that the 'grin' is known as 'sardonic laughter,' since they die laughing. (trans. Paul G. Mosca)'

Diodorus Siculus [Another greek historian] in book XX chpt 1-18 describes the following:

'There was in their city a bronze image of Cronus, extending its hands, palms up and sloping toward the ground, so that each of the children when placed thereon rolled down and fell into a sort of gaping pit filled with fire.'

Not only is this shockingly familiar I am sure you will agree but furthermore Cronus of the greek pantheon is now been implicated with the same MLK type of sacrifice made notoriously to Moloch...but don't worry more on that to come later. Something here also to bear in mind was the sheer scale of the doing, to take another example from Diodorus Siculus from the same book and chapters:

'In their zeal to make amends for their omission, they selected two hundred of the noblest children and sacrificed them publicly; and others who were under suspicion sacrificed themselves voluntarily, in number not less than three hundred.'

The omission of which they speak is related earlier in the same text and is as follows:

'they had been accustomed to sacrifice to this god the noblest of their sons, but more recently, secretly buying and nurturing children, they had sent these to the sacrifice; and when an investigation was made, some of those who had been sacrificed were discovered to have been supposititious'

So it was the quality of the sacrfiice that was taken into account, not merely the act or the quantity of the act.

There is also some Rabbinical commentary on the notion. The 12th century Rashi [Medievil french rabbi and commentator on the talmund and tanakh] when commenting on Jeremiah 7:31 which reads:

'They have built the high places of Topheth in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to burn their sons and daughters in the fire-something I did not command, nor did it enter my mind.'

Rashi commented thus:

'Tophet is Moloch, which was made of brass; and they heated him from his lower parts; and his hands being stretched out, and made hot, they put the child between his hands, and it was burnt; when it vehemently cried out; but the priests beat a drum, that the father might not hear the voice of his son, and his heart might not be moved.'

Furthermore rabbinical tradition attributed to Rabbi Simeon's Yalkout states that:

'the idol was hollow and was divided into seven compartments, in one of which they put flour, in the second turtle-doves, in the third a ewe, in the fourth a ram, in the fifth a calf, in the sixth an ox, and in the seventh a child, which were all burned together by heating the statue inside.'

Indeed the notion that the veritable pantheon of ancient deities named with 'MLK' is not a new contention, and has been put forward by Scholars of the 17th century, although some suggested that the accounts of sacrifice were symbolic in nature, to give an example of these competing contentions John Seldon in 1617 wrote an essay in which he suggests that the phrase 'h'byr b'sh lmlk' "making to pass over the fire to Molek" was a form of purification ritual rather than a sacrifice but this remains a fairly fringe theory and I do not subscribe to it myself. I feel there is good evidence to suggest a continuity of child sacrifice from the iron or late bronze age canaan up to at least the fall of Carthage in the 2nd-century BC. Friedrich Mnter in his work 'Die Religion der Karthager' [Written 1816] and Franz Karl Movers in 'Die Phnizier' [Written 1841] both conclude that Molek [Moloch] was identical to Baal and to be considered a fire god.

Furthermore and perhaps somewhat more disturbingly we begin to unravel more of the relation between Moloch and Yhwh to which was both given the same referential title that meant 'king or great king' along with Baal and the rest of the sacrificial gods. Georg Friedrich Daumer and Friedrich Wilhelm Ghillany in 1841 both published work on the subject in which they conclude that the biblical texts reflects an original identity of Molek [Moloch] and Yhwh and that the worship of Yhwh came about from the worship of Moloch by the act of abolishing the child sacrifices. Let us examine Exodus 13:2, 22:28 wherein it states:

'Consecrate to me every firstborn; whatever opens the womb among the Israelites, whether of human being or beast, belongs to me.'

To be be 'consecrated' or 'given' to Yhwh, the parallel here is hard to miss, a clear yet vestigal reference to human sacrifice. This seems to be even more apparent when we consider J.B. Hennessy who in 1966 excavated and reported on a temple at Amman [dated to 1400-1250 BC] which shows the possibility of bestial and human sacrifice by fire. The subject of child sacrifice in Canaan has always been a topic of hot debate, with some scholars saying that simple childrens grave yards were uncovered, however in Carthage it is well documented to be have been discovered a mix of childrens and animal bones aswell as epigraphic evidence involving mention of MLK, from which we can conclude that at least in Carthage, child sacrifice was common practise indeed.

- Marduk, Bel, Ba'al and the worship of The Master -

So having discussed the emergence of The Horned Beast in Canaan and Amon let's talk about the Sumerians and the babylonians; specifically to begin with a late born deity in the pantheon known as Marduk, in Sumerian 'amar utu.k' which is to mean 'calf of the sun, or solar calf', so by now you can probably see where this is going, the depiction of the horned aspects can be traced back to at least Sumeria, with a fairly distint lineage evolving through time, that this was represented in Marduk as the 'Solar Calf' the Golden Calf that the Canaanites worshiped referenced as the king of kings/great lord/master, the origins of Moloch and the act of worship by MLK. But let's discuss it anyway, Marduk was the patron deity of the city Babylon, and as Babylon aquired further political power in the latter half of the second millenium BC he rose to the forefront of the pantheon, interestingly Marduk was likely to have been pronounced as 'Marutuk' in which the etymology of the word could suggest an ascociation with 'amar-Utu' which means 'bull calf of the sun god Utu' so you can see how they might well be connected. Utu being worshipped as a Sun god around 3500BC roughly a thousand years prior to the rise of Marduk to prominence.

But anyway let's get back on track to the over arching point of this section and talk about Bel and ba'al [Baal] now both terms roughly translated as we have talked about before mean something akin to king or great king, but they also mean Master and the two forms of the word Bel/Baal-Ba'al were interchangable to take some examples: Bel = Lord, Bel rabim = Great Lord, bl blim = Lord of Lords. And when babylon became the capitol for want of a better word of southern mesopotamia under the reign of 'Hammurabi' Marduk being the patron deity of babylon was elevated to the status of a supreme god, a leader of gods, a 'Lord of Lords' and the texts of the Enma Eli were written to describe Marduk's rise to supremacy, in which the Anunnaki [Sumerian pantheon] promise Marduk the role of supreme god if he can help them defeat the gods rising against them in a sort of divine civil war.

So Ba'al and Bel, which means Master were used to refer to Marduk which would later down the line evolve into Mo loch and the 'bull calf' aspect of Marduk would be emphasised into the physicality of Moloch as the bull, but of course the 'solar calf' aspect was not to be forgotten and so we can quite easily see how the concept of the 'Solar calf' would later become Moloch the Bull to whom's flames the sacrifices would be made, the flames of the 'solar calf' which is the Sun. Now it is also interesting to note that the Babylonian/Assyrian god 'Nabu' known as 'Nisaba' in the Sumerian pantheon gained great prominance around the 1st millenium BC so shortly after Marduk, and was identified in fact as being the son of Marduk. Fascinatingly he was depicted wearing a horned cap [An obvious reference to the Solar Calf, the Horned Beast] and rode upon a dragon harkening to Marduk's companion the dragon, which will become fairly important later on when we talk about the Roman pantheon, but let's not get ahead of ourselves now. Nabu makes an apparence in Jeremiah 48:1 mentioned as Nebo but quite clearly is refering to Nabu as you will see, the text is as follows:

'Bel bows down, Nebo stoops low; their idols are borne by beasts of burden. The images that are carried about are burdensome, a burden for the weary.'

So here they are refering to the Idols of Bel [Who is Ba'al, who is Marduk] and his son Nabu being carted away by beasts of burden, this passage is concerning the fall of Babylon, which is explained more in Jeremiah 50:1-3 which is as follows:

'This is the word that the LORD spoke through Jeremiah the prophet concerning Babylon and the land of the Chaldeans: Announce and declare to the nations; lift up a banner and proclaim it; hold nothing back when you say, Babylon is captured; Bel is put to shame; Marduk is shattered, her images are disgraced, her idols are broken in pieces. For a nation from the north will come against her; it will make her land an object of horror. No one will live in it; both man and beast will flee.'

So you may be wondering why I was making such a point of Ba'al/Bel meaning 'Master' as well as 'King', well that is an interesting story, so bare with me while I set this up, because now we are going to go back even further than Marduk, to his father in fact, 'Enki' of the Anunnaki [Pantheon of the Sumerians]. Who was step brother of 'Enlil' and son of 'An or Anu'; Anu being considered the supreme god and progenator of the Annunaki, that is until later on when Marduk was given that posistion when Babylon rose to power, as we have discussed and Anu takes something of a backbench in the mythology, yes even more of a backbench then he already had, at least when we look at the creation mythology of the Sumerians Anu pretty much rests on his laurels after the immediate creation of the universe and the Annunaki race etc.

Too long didn't read

So back to Enki, long story short orignally when the Anunnaki arrived on Earth they had to do the toiling themselves, after a while they got quite tired of this and it seemed that the seeds of malcontent were being readily sowed, Enki being seen as a wise creator, an inventor of sorts suggested that they ought to create a new race of beings to do the toiling for them, so that the Anunnaki might be at rest. Below is some text relating to this acquired from 'ETCSLtranslation : t.1.1.2' [A link will be supplied in the sources section at the end of this discourse] The translations are incomplete due to either wear on the original tablets from which they are transcribed or inability for a relatable meaing to be devined for the missing words, indicated by '...' and (?), The readable texts are as follows:

Sections 1-11: 'the senior gods oversaw the work, while the minor gods were bearing the toil. The gods were digging the canals and piling up the silt in ?arali. The gods, crushing the clay, began complaining about this life.'

Sections 12-23: 'At that time, the one of great wisdom, the creator of all the senior gods, Enki lay on his bed, not waking up from his sleep, in the deep engur, in the subterranean water, the place the inside of which no other god knows. The gods said, weeping: "He is the cause of the lamenting! Namma, the primeval mother who gave birth to the senior gods, took the tears of the gods to the one who lay sleeping, to the one who did not wake up from his bed, to her son: "Are you really lying there asleep, and not awake? The gods, your creatures, are smashing their . My son, wake up from your bed! Please apply the skill deriving from your wisdom and create a substitute (?) for the gods so that they can be freed from their toil!'

Sections 24-37: 'Enki reached out his arm over them and turned his attention to them. And after Enki, the fashioner of designs by himself, had pondered the matter, he said to his mother Namma: "My mother, the creature you planned will really come into existence. Impose on him the work of carrying baskets. You should knead clay from the top of the abzu; the birth-goddesses (?) will nip off the clay and you shall bring the form into existence. Let Ninma? act as your assistant; and let Ninimma, u-zi-ana, Ninmada, Ninbarag, Ninmug, and Ninguna stand by as you give birth. My mother, after you have decreed his fate, let Ninma? impose on him the work of carrying baskets."'

So here we can see Enki deciding to undertake the creation of a new set of beings of a lower order who will take up the toiling of the gods; in which he states he will mould the form of these beings from clay [Not metioned in the above text translations but it is widely considered in the Sumerian creation mythology that the clay was mixed with the blood of one of the gods who was slain for this purpose]. You may already see here the parralel with the greek promethean mythology in which the titan does exactly the same and moulds the form of man from clay, but more on that later, back to Enki. So followed a period of seeming trial and error as various deformed and maladied versions of man are created. So what does this have to do with the concept of Mastery? well we have shown how originally the Anunnaki created man to be a slave race, the word 'Worship' means 'to work for' and so the slaves would 'Worship' their master and creator Enki, and they too would worship Enki's son, Marduk, whom they would refer to as Bel or Ba'al to mean 'Master' to whom one would be enslaved to toil for.

So perhaps now having explored what the 'Solar calf' is one can see the linkage with the 'Golden idol of canaan' a literal golden bull, a 'Solar calf' so to speak, and also the recuring idoltry of a horned beast of the earth and the element of fire as we see in representations of Moloch and Cronus. One might also see how the concept of the 'Solar calf' in itself implies the mastery of the Solar body over the beasts of the earth. That is to say, I do belive it could be construded literally, the solar calf is a representation of the creatures of the earth being the scions of the Solar body which provides the energy that nourishes them and is responsible for their initial creation. This also makes sense when we look at Marduk's relation to his name and to his his father, Marduk is the solar calf, so what does this tell us about his father Enki? well we can certainly point out that as we have just discussed Enki is credited with the creation of man. But the truth is that the connotations of Marduk and Enki actually go a little further when we bring Enki's father into the mix.

Holy shit many you wrote a whole fucking book, this better be good

So Enki, father of Marduk, is in turn the son of 'An' or 'Anu' who was, before Marduk's rise to fame, the original ancestor of the Anunnaki, considered to have been the 'Supreme God' by the Sumerians. However it is worth pointing out that in line with his very brief apprence in the Sumerian creation myth 'An or Anu' was not really worshipped very much, with the worship being more directed at his sons Enlil and Enki. In fact in the context of the Mesopotamian religious history the 'Head Deity' was said to possess the 'antu' which means the 'An-power' so perhaps it could be seen more as a title or posistion of power than one particular set and recurring entity. Although as supreme gods go 'Anu' was pretty much the real deal, he was refered to as 'God of the sky' and 'One who contains the entire universe' so pretty much the utmost powerful beng that could exist and a classic depiction of an "all-god".

But it would be a mistake to take each of the three individuals Enki/Enlil/Anu and analyse them on their own becuase the Sumerians also had a version of what might more commonly be known as 'The Holy Trinity' which describes a concept by which the divine is a construction of three componants. In this context of trinity 'Anu' would represent an abstract Trancendental unknowable quality, 'Enlil' would represent the transcendant and 'Enki' would represent the Immanence
Which is to say a state in which the divine encompasses of manifests in the material world, as opposed to transcendant which would be beyond the material world. So to rephrase you would have Enki representing divinity in the material world, Enlil representing divinity in the trancendant realm and over it all Anu to represent the abstract quality of the divine which exists unknowably beyond all boundaries. So now let's talk about how that relates to our quest for the Horned Beast, we have talked about how the Solar Calf could be taken both literally and figuratively, though I myself tend to lean towards the former.

Let's look at Marduk in a greater context:

Marduk > Enki > Anu

Solar Calf > Lord of the Earth - Creator of Man > lord of the all - Creator of the Universe

Marduk, the calf and representative of the beasts of the earth > Enki the father representative of the life giving powers of the Sun > Anu the all and representative of the creation of the universe itself which would produce the Sun.

So to take a closer look at Enki, he created mankind, he embodies divinity in the material world and he sired the solar calf. This in my opinion is ample reason to contend that Enki is the Sun, and that Marduk is the beast of the earth that sprung from the Solar radience of his father. So it would seem that far enough back along the timeline the "Horned Beast" motif, was actually a Solar reference, there is something quite fitting about that when we consider the theistic christian depictions of the Horned Beast amidst the sea of fire. Worth noting also that not only is just Marduk depicted as wearing the horned cap, which is essentially the origins of the "Horned motif" but so are Enki and Enlil, so the three parts of the holy trinity of Enki/Enlil/Anu are the Manifestation of divinity in the material world, the manifestation of divinity in the transcendant world and the abstract quality of transcendance, with both of the "Transcendant manifestations" bearing the Horns, perhaps literally a sign of their manifestation. One could not help here but point out the phallic symbolism of the Horn and of Manifesting into reality.

Let's take a quick look at some other deities from the region that may become relevant again when we go onto talk about the Roman pantheon. A strong reucrring theme you might have observed by now is storm/sky embodiment deities as well as a healthy scattering of Solar/Lunar deities, namely: Aglibl/Malakbel/Baalshamin - A trio prominant in ancient Palmyra, Syria. These three deities are thought to form a trinity in the order of:

Aglibol - Lunar [To mean 'Calf of the Bel']
Malakbel - Solar [To mean 'messenger of Baal' in Aramaic]
Baalshamin / Ba'al amem - Sky/Storm ['Lord of Heavens' in Aramaic]

Bel/Baal as we have previously discussed is a term that was applied to multiple entites over different periods but whose greatest use seems to be tied to Marduk and Enki of the Sumerian pantheon, so with Aglibol it would mean something along the lines of the Calf of the Master, Son of the Master and Malakbel similarly to mean Messenger of the Master and ultimatley Ba'al Samen/Baalshamin, the Master himself. However 'Ba'al' was more often applied to 'Hadad' who is the other Northwest Semitic supreme god, using the same symbolic depictions of the thunderbolt, the bull and the lion, not to mention of course beng depicted with a bull horned headress as we should pretty much come to have expected by this point.

It should already be plain to see the reucrring pattern here, it's as if the exact same deity[s] are being reused time and again with changes of name and small changes to depiction but still ultimatley representing and embodying the same concepts. , the worship of the Master
continues...

That concludes todays dictation, watch out for future 'episodes'.

- Rook

What was the point of all of this? Is this a religion your pushing? What was this supposed to redpill me about?

Me have big pee pee hehehe

It's a demonstration in just how far past fucked our species is. This is entry level stuff for identifying the enemy. The species is fucked because most all of you don't even realize there is an enemy, let alone what form it takes and what it uses to hide behind.

my question to you is why do i feel so shameful after i toy my ass and have an intense sissygasm?

smoke more weed, lock yourself back up in your room, and drown yourself in some more Monster Magnet you brofist

Attached: 1587172157246.jpg (450x608, 110.05K)