Are these RUSSIAN HOORS considered Huwhite?

Are these RUSSIAN HOORS considered Huwhite?

Attached: Untitled.jpg (2366x1283, 311.91K)

No. Russians aren't white.
No matter how pale or blonde they are, Russians are Asiatic mongoloids, not whites

Despite some Norse heritage, the Russians are not white. The only whites are Nords with viking blood like people from the Hebrides, Iceland, and what little remains of purity in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden. The British are filthy Celtic-Italic-Norse mutts

this is why a white ethnostate would never work, no one would be white enough and purity tests and mechanisms of exclusion would get more absurd until the system collapses

Forgot link

chaturbate huntertiana

Attached: Untitled.jpg (2359x1255, 272.64K)

Did I say 'hebrides' I meant Orkney

Now the Muslim's are spreading their seed in the Nordic countries

Attached: 1586078123598.png (305x300, 134.75K)

I mean race is constructed etc etc but for Russians to pretend to belong to an ethnoculture that they've got nothing to do with and were historically excluded from because it fits in with the idea of based Russia today is just risible.
Russians are Ur-slavs. When they're content with that they're fine. When they larp as whites, they're pitiable.

suace?

Love it!

Attached: Untitled2.jpg (2355x1281, 298.48K)

Shut up shill.
Here's a thought. Germany for Germans. England for the English, Sweden for the Swedish.
All white, but different ethnicities.
It's almost like "WHITE ETHNOSTATE" isn't a purity spiral, or a big tent.
It's almost like there should be many white ethnostates.
It's almost like nations are of people.
Send everyone home.

Literally just jerked to this before coming here

Given that "white" isnt a racial classification...

Put into biological classification, Russians aren't strictly Caucasioid/Europoid, but Mongoloid.

This doesn't mean much though as even Americans fall under the Mongoloid Classification, So Russians are like White Americans, but not white Europeans.

Attached: Meyers_map.jpg (1280x1016, 330.79K)

They're still white. Their skin is white. White isn't a race.

>huntertiana
that left one is so fucking ugly

No, white is a pseudoscientific taxonomy invented in the 19th century to distinguish American slaveholders from black chattel. Guess what - that still doesn't make Russians white.

This is debunkable by pointing out that native south Americans, Native Australians, and south east asians all have "black" skin yet aren't black.

White is a loose group of ethnicities.
White is a tool of language.

jesus christ that's a perfect pussy if i ever seen one

They're more white than you'll ever be, jew faggot.

You an academic? Or just literate?

Still travelling to Russia later this year to fuck a sexy Russian girl I've been chatting up.

Uh oh did the 4th-generation slav amerimutt get his widdle feelings hurt?
Russians are the niggers of pale skin

That depends on whether you mean white as a race or white as a skin tone. They're white in the sense that they have pale skin. Hair is obviously bleached so you can't count that. But, slavs have different genetics than those originally considered racially white so they're some kind of schrodinger's whites. They'd likely be considered white in the english speaking world but they'll never be universally accepted as such

So this isn't Huwhite Right?????

We True Huwhites cannot legally fuck this pussy!!!!

Attached: 5.jpg (2353x1288, 253.32K)

"White" as a classification has no scientific basis.
Russians are mostly Slavic, although the nobles were mostly Nordic with a Slavic admixture. Slavs and Nordics have a common origin and are both mostly descended from the ancient Yamnaya people who spread the Indo-European Languages, although the Slavs are more mixed with Mongols and Uralics.

Sauce faggot

>although the nobles were mostly Nordic with a Slavic admixture
Obviously this depends on the time period but in terms of the classical Rus, yes. The Kievan nobility was Rurikid Viking.

>"White" as a classification has no scientific basis.
what a stupid thing to say.

In what way?

you can't say a term is "not scientific," because a term by itself lacks content. "physics" and "metallurgy" don't fully explain themselves by themselves, and until they're elaborated they're just as devoid of scientific content as the concept of "white." white can be scientific or not scientific, and this depends on many things. for instance, the concept of "white," even at its most retarded usage, is more scientific than the current prevailing post-racial or aracial ideology in all western countries.

Except for the fact that whiteness is born out of outdated racial Darwinism that is itself horribly unscientific.
Whiteness can be culturally real, and that's valid enough. But if you say it's scientifically real, you've said too much.

>although the Slavs are more mixed with Mongols and Uralics
Not really the case for Western Slavs and even when it comes down to Eastern ones, it is mostly the Russians that are mixed. There isn't much Mongoloid, especially Uralic admixture when to comes down to Belorussians and Ukrainians, though nowadays there is quite a lot of Russian admixture which also includes the fore-mentioned Asiatic groups.

how did darwinism create obvious distinctions between human subspecies existing for tens of thousands of years?