Can you judge art objectively anons?
Can you judge art objectively anons?
Robert Rivera
David Watson
No, but you can make evaluative judgements and there's nothing wrong with that.
Ian Campbell
Very good
Alexander Sanchez
Picasso ruined art. He gave birth to the idea that people with no artistic talent could be artists.
Jack Martinez
That's not really relevant.
Jeremiah Morgan
Sorta is, cuz now we live in a world when people criticize art more leniently because people like Picasso popularized terrible art. Art is a fucking joke anyhow. Go into computers or engineering
Landon Sullivan
No. Art isn't ahistorical, so the time in which it was produced also matters.
Like, one day I could just take a .active shit in the middle of an art gallery and everyone would be like "ew gross. Someone get an immigrant to clean that up."
But nowadays I could do the same thing and millenials would be like "that's so brave. Put it on twitter and tell the world! He's fighting fascism."
Context is important.
Lucas Kelly
*massive, not active.
Kek.
Connor Sullivan
No.
He was jerking off to people killing themselves. Duh.
Aiden Wood
Yes. You can judge if it can fit through a door or judge him long and wide it is. You can also judge what colors it has and what it weighs. It is also not unreasonable to make judgements about what materials it is made from.