How fucking dumb, how completely fucking retarded do you have to be to think a 5G signal can cause or transmit a virus? Do you also believe the Earth is flat?
How fucking dumb, how completely fucking retarded do you have to be to think a 5G signal can cause or transmit a virus...
Devil's advocate: how fucking dumb do you have to be to think that something you can't even see can kill you? (germs)
Never reproduce
You can see germs with microscopes....
how do you know it isn't flat?
How do you know that radiation doesnt lower immune systems?
Because 5G frequencies don't carry nearly enough energy to disrupt your body in any meaningful way.
Not devil's advocate, just a retarded straw man argument. You should kill yourself for making such a stupid statement.
Wrong
Non-ionizing. Next
If it were true then you should stop using your radio, your phone, your TV and your microwave right now.
i wonder whats going on inside those conspiracy believers once the whole virus alert is cooling down and there wasn´t any final war. i never heard of anyone say something like: "ok, this whole thing about the chemtrails sounded plausible at the time, but i have to admit it was a bit silly."
It doesn't transmit it dumbfuck, it weakens the human immune system
It's literal secret club shit. They and an enlightened few know the TRUTH about the world and all the plebs who follow the mainstream science are just sheep.
In an age with a thousand news sources for every point of view, it's incredibly easy to surround yourself with ideas that support what you believe.
People don't need to have all the facts. They just need enough to have replies, even if those replies are dogshit. Trump is walking proof of that. People like him because he always has something to say. Always has a response. If you buy into everything, it's all inline with the same mentality so people accept it, even if it's completely wrong and easily refutable.
The earth is flat and no one has claimed that 5G can transmit a virus, rather that the symptoms attributed to Covid-19 are caused by 5G towers.
It's a plan to wipe out the minorities
It started out as a prank made by a Yas Forums poster, but got out of control.
at this point I wouldn't doubt it
earth is provably flat and motionless, but I guess you haven't done any research and are still believing that globe-suppository that bill 'cia' nye rammed up your ass.
Look up how the michaelson-morley experiment proves the earth is motionless, or how the lack of visible stellar parallax shows that we aren't whizzing through space at 8000000 miles per hour.
A) 5G is only meant to make you pay more for internet+LAN
B) 5G health issues = 99% uncharted territory
A)
local wireless networking is currently dominated by wifi.
wifi equals free.
once you have "one" internet provider, your local area network is fully covered.
adding more devices to your wifi is easy and free.
you'll pay some extra only when you need internet outside of your wifi area (say, a wireless data SIM-card for your tablet), and that's that.
bUt ThErE mUsT eXiSt SoMe TrIcK to make you pay MORE MONEY!!
enter 5G.
all your future devices will be on 5G.
providers will make you pay both on data volume and total devices connected.
basically they want you forget wifi (free, under your control at home) to embrace 5G (faster, not under your control, not actually free)
B)
5G uses high frequency channels (24 to 73 GHz frequencies, with plans to go up to 90 GHz and more; wikipedia for some details).
the higher the frequency, the larger the useful bandwidth, channels, LAN, etc.
note: imagine 1000 "5G" devices transmitting 1 gigabit each, while the "5G towers mesh" backbone can't handle more than 100 gigabits. "Overbooking", anyone? "Throttling", anyone?
the higher the frequency, the smaller the coverage, the larger the number of 5G towers needed.
also, the higher the frequency, the higher irradiated power. cramp even more irradiate power with MIMO technology.
you'll be showered with 24 to 73 GHz RF with unpredictable issues. no true large scale tests exist yet (technology wasn't advanced enough to even start).
99% uncharted territory.
well, good luck with your Muh Gigabits Gigahertz 5G.
Note:
- emails, tweets, SMS, ssh maintenance, etc: in the order of kilobytes.
- pictures, music, documents, bills, PDF's, small videos, websites, etc: in the order of megabytes.
- videos, movies, games, entire operating systems, etc: in the order of gigabytes.
do we actually need "more maximum theoretical speed" or "more minimum guaranteed speed"?
which of them is easier to market?
TL;DR: "5G" is needed to extract more money from customers, while not giving a fuck about their health
With the exception of high resolution video streaming (including shit like Stadia and Netflix), existing infrastructure is basically good enough.
A guaranteed "one megabit throughput" is enough for your job, your youtube entertainment, documents, services.
Anyway, you can't notice the difference between "full HD" and "4k", even less "4k" vs "8k".
>existing infrastructure is basically good enough.
Good enough for what? For current devices? A bit like rural tracks were perfectly fine for horse and carts, so even though we invented the car we didn't need highways?
how does it feel to have no mental capabilities whatsoever? how does it make you arrogant?
>Anyway, you can't notice the difference between "full HD" and "4k", even less "4k" vs "8k".
you literally can jackass. whats next, are you gonna tell me the human eye can't detect higher framerates than 30?
Vicious circle:
- ISPs offering "high speeds"
- websites getting insanely bloated because dem "high speeds"
- people demanding "higher speeds" because websites don't load fast enough
Somethings is really wrong.
Go read the small print of a contract you sign of a 5g phone. It stats that you're ok with it causing biological harm. Now why insert that clause if 5g is safe?! But i know youre too mucj of a kike loving nigger to think for yourself
water finds and maintains its own level. If earth were a sphere, then the water would be unable to find its level. This also holds true for rivers - if the earth were a globe then how would water in the Mississippi river ascend 11 miles uphill on its way to the ocean?
That's no devil's advocate, that's low base fuckwit's advocate.
1/10, can't actually be this dumb
Most of these 5g conspiracy theorists and flat-earthers are probably just shills, paid for by companies who wish to de-legitimize truthful things in the future by association. For example, a "flat-earther" actor will make a Facebook page that warns of the dangers of climate change. This is ideal for oil company CEOs, because everyone knows flat-earthers are full of shit and can't be taken seriously.
A spin-off of this are two types of people: trolls who think it's funny to keep the meme going, and U.S. residents who are actually retarded enough to believe the bullshit, thanks to their miserable education system and brain fog due to poor diet.
Nope I genuinely know that the earth is flat, you globies are the ones who are retarded for believing everything your governments shove down your throats . Why is there a globe in every classroom in every school? Why does water find its own level in every single observable case except around the alleged spinning ball?
The stars should seem to separate as we allegedly move towards them in our orbit, yet they haven't moved in thousands of years, Stars are small and local. If the earth were spinning eastward at 1000 miles per hour, hot air balloons could merely rise up into the air and stay stationary as their destinations race towards them. These are really easy concepts and the fact you people don't even look into them is laughable.
It's the frequency. Wake up, idiots.
Given governments and large companies lies, everyone putting up some conspiracy page will eventually get some internet karma.
But you must be a real fool to think that flat-earthers are no different than people scared by 5G.
The principle of "cui prodest?" (who will take advantage of it?) always applies.
If we exclude internet karma and gadgets/swag, flat-earthers can be ruled out as autistic trolls.
Every 10 years the entire telecommunications industry needs some "revolution" to sell a whole lot of new gadgets.
Well, 4G was a literal fiasco. You may be too young to remember that it promised full HD video to every cellphone out there. Industries heavily invested into it, expecting at least a quarter of the promised miracles. They're still desperately trying to recover from that epic fiasco.
>4G speeds are useless if the backbone can't steadily support very large throughputs.
The 5G revolutiln is yet another fiasco asking for gullible investors. To get half of its theoretical throughput on a decent number of clients in a given area, you have to build a 50x capable backbone.
Then there's the fact that the only manufacturers ready to sell 5G shit are Chinks, that is, the renowned "health & safety first!" experts.
right around 60 GHz the frequency resonates with oxygen in the blood and prevents it from being absorbed. That's suspicious when we have a disease that affects respiration sweeping the world at the exact same time as the 5G rollout right? wake up kids