Do liberals find this hot or something?

They’re always the sickos freaks creeps trap loving loli masturbating losers

Attached: image.jpg (1600x848, 420.78K)

>Yas Forums
>conservative
Hello new friend

Exactly this. And then they're delusional to think that the jews make those bbc threads but it's their retarded maga buddies that secretly would love to see their wives fucked by other men

If it pisses off white Christians, it's on platform.

Yas Forums is center right, like the rest of the Western world.

Lol what. The president of the EU celebrates Karl Marx's birthday. Go fuck yourself you idiot

Liberals: Okay with a girl seeing men pretending to be puppies with no actual sexual interaction. But the men are nearly nude, so freak out.

Conservative: Okay with priests and sport coaches institutionally molesting and raping children. Also okay with molesting and raping women.

Given the choice, I'd say the one that causes less physical, mental and emotional harm is the better one.

Attached: image.jpg (960x912, 405.53K)

and to top it all, they believe they are christians that will go to heaven and others that do not believe in god will burn in hell

>a fetish parade isn't sexual
Wtf is wrong with you, kys

How about neither you degenerare retard

The further you distance yourself from religious lunatics, the more the same ways of thinking have to get plugged into some other outlets. So for leftist (and some liberal) lunatics their self appointed moral superiority is their crown jewel and with that you can legitimize anything in the name of compassion.

The thread is devolving into political bait and cuck shitposting. Before it falls entirely to the bots, where did this image come from. Why the fuck did someone brkng their kid to this kind of event? There has to be more context in this to make sense.

I used to think they had their limits....

.....then they ruined The Witcher.

Attached: whichwhichwouldwhich.jpg (1200x630, 68.44K)

I'm liberal and I find the kid hot but that's just because that happens to be my sexual orientation. Those men are into submission, degradation, etc. They enjoy being humiliated, and I wouldn't be surprised if that moment gave at least one of them a boner. Then again, I'm pretty biased. Not because I'm liberal, but because I'm a pedo.

celebrate sexuality user this is the cure to cancer

Not sure you know what sex is. Looking at a picture doesn't count as sex.

sexual means having to do with sex, sex means sex. Fetish has to do with sex, the parade is for fetishes, it has to do with sex. The parade is sexual.

So you are arguing that looking a picture is equivalent to sex.

Well then, it's a handy thing you're not in charge of rules, laws or definitions and that no one cares about your personal, off-the-top-of-your-head, uneducated, immature, and totally arbitrary opinion.

>a bunch of intentionally half-naked guys in dog outfits isn't something sexual 99.9999% of the time
So when a mommy and a daddy loves each other veeeeeery much, the stork brings them a beautiful lovely baby for them to care for and cherish. Sometimes the stork likes to wear outfits to mix things up a bit. If you have any other questions, ask your dad. He is around, right?

Sexual isn't the same as sex, that's the first thing I said. Learn to read.

You're not allowed to show kids porn for the same reason retard. Why do you keep looking for semantic excuses to bring kids to something they don't need to be exposed to? Fuck, I don't want to be exposed to gay dog-play myself. No one but dog-play fetishist gay guys would want to be around it. I wouldn't bring my kid to the strip club for the same reason. Please get better before you hurt someone.

>fetish has to do with sex, the parade is for fetishes

Both of these statements are false. You're just strapping your own personal definitions to things based on your own personal, off-the-top-of-your-head, uneducated, immature, and totally arbitrary opinion.

You are not the god of words. Words already have meanings.