What do you think about the Oklahoma City bombing in April 1995 (168 dead, 680 injured)?

There was an unindicted 3rd conspirator. An Iranian national. Jayna Davis, an investagative journalist, back in the 90s did some solid reporting on this. Matched the guy to witness statements and police sketch drawings, made financial connections, etc. They had him nailed to the crime, but they didn't follow through due to political pressure from the white house. He later died in prison. He was there for other, unrelated crimes.

Iraqi national. Sorry, I'm mildly retarded this morning.

No worries user, they're both sandy shitholes. I get them mixed up all the time too.

I don't think about it at all.

I think that a crazy white man is more resourceful than any 100 ISIS mudslimes combined.

Attached: 1586049603094.png (925x919, 714.06K)

He had planned on parking the truck under the building but it wouldn't fit into the garage. Had it been down there it would have brought the whole building down.

That story really blew up.

Attached: carlos.jpg (600x600, 34.54K)

it was retaliation for the horrible shit the US govt did at Wako. he considered that an act of war against the american people so he hit them back at a govt. building. swat teams were mowing down woman and children from a helicopter, burning them and gassing them. innocent cult people on a farm. they called it "a compound" in the news. One of the biggest lies americans believe is that this dude didnt have a really good reason for getting revenge for those innocent people.

>Fake news, Airplanes can't fly that low and jet fuel can't melt steel beams.

THIS

By killing other innocent people? He had some retarded logic

WACO
>What
>A
>Cook
>Out

Fuck the Branch Davidians

How about when they found a leg but no body to go with it, and they ran dna and found out it belonged to a chick named lakisha i think, but she was already buried with her legs, so they dug her up and it turns out she was buried with someone else’s leg who has never been identified

it was a government building

dont think you know how war works.

Don't know, wasn't even alive lol.

Many of the victims were children. McVeigh claimed he didn't know the building contained a day care center, but like all terrorists he believed his cause was just regardless. Fuck him.

Attached: Firefighterbabyocb.jpg (280x355, 19.7K)

read "the third terrorist."

us govt has done a lot worse. are they terrorists?

">" Be me
">" mobilefag just testing out on a useless threat if i can do greentexts on mobile

From what I remember:
The media was bitching that kids died in the daycare located in the building. People countered with "Well you shouldn't have your damn kids in a government building!"

As of right now, I don't really recall the motives of the bomber, except it was anti-government in nature. There's a time to destroy an authoritarian government, but then wasn't it.

>lets see if it works now. Sry guys

the US has drone bombed a hundred times more innocent people. thats a fact. often a complete accident. but everyone knows that already.

Using a broad definition of the term, yes. You could argue that since the victims of the bombing were U.S. government workers, they were members of a terrorist organization and therefore lawful targets, and you'd be a fucking idiot for doing so because you're essentially eliminating the line between civilian and combatant. Political violence of all kinds should be condemned when it involves attacks against civilians.

Entertaining, interesting... for a short time. We lost interest pretty quickly. It surfaced again a little with McVeigh's execution but overall it wasn't the long-running media frenzy it had the potential to be. OJ Simpson and Monica Lewinsky got more coverage and special interest. Overall, on an interesting scale of 1-10, I'd rate it a solid 7. Not 9/11, not the moon landing, and certainly not COVID-19. But it was about as relevant as Columbine.