You faggots will argue about anything

>being this retarded

rotational momentum has a factor here so its important to see the tires from the side to see how thick the sidewall is, i dont think the traction has that much of an effect given how low the acceleration is. i doubt there will be any loss of grip.

Discount tire employee detected
Would you also like to tell me about how the right loses breaking power

Neither tyre will break

>same size
In that case left wins because it weighs more and gains more momentum before lift off.

The one with tread due to reduced traction. Friction will slow the other one down.

The one that goes straight and doesn’t tip over.

Nor will the tyres get tired now we're getting into it.

bait and probably OP

Attached: baited.png (224x225, 4.78K)

Left has more mass so that one

You dirty band of filthy ignorant homosexuals - have none of you remembered your "laminar flow" studies from 6th grade???

You make me sick.

they both gone go at the same speed. unless ones a difrent wieght

Left will go further because of the sticker.

first one with brains so far

Because heavier things fall to the earth faster because gravity is harder on them.

Thank you Professor Dipshit

>>You faggots will argue about anything
That's a goddamn lie. Take it back, faggot

Left because less surface area, therefore less friction if the materials are otherwise the same.

This is wrong.

Right ofc

Heavier things fall faster to the ground. Take a 20 pound shotput and drop it from a tower next to a feather and the shotput will hit the ground first 8 times out of 10, easy.

The slickness of the tire is likely irrelevant, so the tire that has the least amount of mass furthest from the center of the tire will go furthest as it will gain more speed down the ramp.

Attached: bf9.jpg (756x1100, 112.97K)

Left tire
>assuming both tires were same model and size
Left is heavier due to having full tread adding weight and has less rolling resistance because not worn completely down

falling objects have the same acceleration regardless of mass

Attached: PW2016-10-cartwright-fig1.jpg (700x1042, 84.23K)

Probably trolling, which makes me probably trolled.

Wrong. They fall at the same rate. Google feather and hammer in the moon

Air resistance is the only differential here. And the only thing that will slow down one tyre over the other is rolling resistance / friction. The new tyre will win

Larger diameter makes things roll slower dumbass

>right has more mass and tread makes it more areo dynamic
>left has more surface area meaning more friction which results in less momentum.

Lol. Gravity acts the same on all objects. Mass is not going to change whether you fall faster. It's ONLY about friction which can come in the form of air friction by having a larger surface area.

Neither.
Over hundreds of revolutions the Lefts label will create a drag imbalance causing it to veer inward and crash into the Right, wiping both off the track until the Chinese invade and replace you all.

Just like in real life.

>excluding relevant elements of the problem
found the physicist

Attached: vacuum.jpg (1000x887, 73.27K)

Technically this is correct. The heavier object has a larger gravitational field and would actually pull the Earth closer to it at a faster rate than the lighter object. However, this is so insignificant a difference that I don't think we have any instruments that would be sensitive enough to measure the difference.

>thinking people have actually been to the moon

Left:
More weight, larger diameter, more rigid.

Good point. Didn't consider that.

.... In a vacuum.
Not on Earth
And certainly not on a ramp

No you dumb cunt, because the heavier object will be harder to stop

This

Air resistance / drag is not relevant in this case. The tyre will not be rolling fast enough.

Projectile motion formula says that if the tires are launched at the same angle and speed (neglect air drag) then they will have the same range.

Attached: projectile-motion.png (1073x463, 31.44K)

>slicks
>made for less traction
>made for less contact with the ground
>not used on specially paved track

Attached: Rigidprobablejackal_b3a9fb_7642343.jpg (1200x1070, 112.27K)

Fuck you ive been there. It was in Florida and it was really expensive to get in and there was a long line but we got in these cars that took us really fast through the dark and sometimes there were strobe lights and it was all inside and we went really fucking fast. It was ok.

Hurr Durr what is momentum

Yep

Attached: 35465324324432.jpg (600x338, 102.78K)

Only if they have the same mass

Distance traveled = KEinitial - Drag
= mgh - (rolling resistance + air resitance)
since we dont know the mass or the rolling resistance of either tire, then the problem is unsolvable

That will be $300

Attached: engineer cup.jpg (600x537, 64.29K)

it has more friction because more of it is contacting the ramp. why do you think they have racing slicks on nascar cars?because they are grippier bcause they have more friction

>Forgetting about mass

Attached: projectile-motion-600.png (600x394, 73.98K)

>tires rolling down a ramp = firing cannon balls on the moon

Attached: spurdo.png (528x404, 12.64K)

>the problem is unsolvable
Always these wise asses who feel all big brained and shit saying that. A true tire expert would be able to give a solid estimate of what's known admitting limited information.

This

the tire with more mass will go farther

Forgot rotational momentum,

so we need to know the moment of inertia as well

Racing tyres are about lateral grip when cornering. In a straight line you would use bicycle tyres because less friction

Forget air resistance too. None of these tyres is breaking 50mph

Are the tires on rims?
are they inflated?
What kind of tire is on the right?

none of that can be gleened from the image

If you want to piss in the wind go ahead.

An intelligent person can recognize when there is insufficient data to solve the problem