What's the final result?

109 ez

109 or you're retarded

Fucking christ 32

32 it's quite easy if u are not blind

As the middle symbol in the bottom row is yet undefined, I define it to be 9000, thust the result is over 9000.

133

238.

it would make it easier if the fucking retards who make these put brackets in like you're supposed to with equations

73 you idiots

U don't need them if you know the fucking order of operations

BAIT

it doesn't matter if you "need" them, that's how you're supposed to fucking write equations

it's 109 btw

this is correct

The only correct answer

i d also say 73=3+5x14

7x + 4

Not enough info to solve for the bottom witch. Any nonsense about what she holds being attributed value is speculation based assumptions.

112

4 + 15 X 7

3 + 15 x 14 = 213

oh shit lmao i didnt even notice that
that makes it more confusing

yall are real dummies. The witches in =45 are carrying both a wand and broom, the one in the equation is not.

12/3 = 4 = broom
21/3 = 7 = wand
45 - 21 (three wands) - 12 (three brooms) = 12
12 / 3 = 4 for each witch
7 + 4 + 4 = 15

56 dumb niggers.

i have to come to the conlusion that there is no correct answer and this is bullshit a mom would post on facebook

I still stand by this

It s 38. Can t believe no one has found the correct answer yet. Poor Yas Forums...

Btw the witch hasn t the wand and the broom on final calcul. So it s 5 (15-7-3).
The brooms, if you look at the second pic there is 2 brooms so 4 in total. So broom = 3.
Multiplication is the main calcul to do, it s the priority so 7x5 = 35
35 +3 = 38. It s as simple as this

112

Layers of retardation here.

fuck me hold on i need to try this again.
i didnt even notice the witches were different

26

is this bait or are you really that autistic?

Correct answer is 112 winrar

Witch = 15
Wand = 7
Broom = 4

Witch without the broom and wand:
(15 - 4) - 7 = 4
(4 + 4) × 7 = 56

Attached: istockphoto-1214514538-170x170.jpg (170x170, 8.46K)

Wow you suck

This isn't a fucking math question it's blasphemy
it doesn't count as getting it wrong if i failed to notice the stacked jpeg brooms

Broom is the 3 look at the middle one

Wrong you have to multiplication first. And broom = 3 look better there is 4 brooms

no i think is right, broom = 3

im right faggot

>people who didn't get 73

Attached: 1548677103858.png (700x700, 513.02K)

how am i wrong

This, I just seen this thread and worked it out, was checking to see if anyone else got this. Nice work user

thats correct but you fucked it UP doing the operation
4+(4x7)=32

Well I can hear this but the one whoare doing addition before multiplication ... there is no excuse for that. They need to go back to school

You guys forgot the witch is holding a broom and a wand

You got the good way to do it but you miss the 4 brooms because of the pics quality. So it is 38.

It's 15 you mongs , look at hands

Attached: dzuojTe.jpg (1211x1904, 526.71K)

but you do see that there are two magic wands in the last row

OK CORRECTION, 4 + 4 x 7 so its 32 cuz PEMDAS

Nope

32.

21 / 3 = 7 = star
12 / 3 = 4 = broom

star + broom = 11 x 3 = 33

45 - 33 = 12

12 / 3 = 4 (the witches are each holding a star and a broom) = witch

BODMAS: Brackets, ordinals, multiplication, addition, subtraction

broom + witch * star = 4 + (7 * 4) = 32

How is this hard?

Exact I missed it. So it s 73.

Yep ive seen it rn the correct answer 38 fuck this shit ass quality pic.

well 109 is correct if you take out all the jpeg fuckery

the witch and the witch no accessories are two different amounts, i.e. X/Y but instead of writing Y for the second one they just made the x smaller

thinking about it algebraically is a lot easier its a shame the person who made this picture is a piece of shit

wand = 21/3 = 7
broom = 12/3 = 4
witch (w/ wand+broom) = 45/3 = 15
wand+broom = 11
witch (w/o wand+broom) = 4
witch (w/o wand+broom) * wand = 28
28 + broom = 32
It's 32

there are also 2 wands on the last line..
so its 5x14 = 70 and 70+3 =73

12 divided by 3 is 4 you retard

In the last operation there is 2 wands. Pic quality is trash.

nope

109. If you have any other answer, sorry, you have a low IQ.

214, there are 2 wands overlapped in the end.

Witch = 15
Wand = 7
Broom = 4

4 + 15 x 7

Order of Operations: PEMDAS (parenthesis first, exponents next, then multiplication and division, and last addition and subtraction)

15 x 7 = 105
4 + 105 = 109

Answer = 109

Attached: 1579080251100.jpg (462x460, 32.8K)

116, didn't notice the witch without wand

let witch = x
broom = b
wand = w
witch with nothing to hold = y

x=(y+b+w)
3x =45
3w = 21
4b=12
y=(x-b)-w
y = (15-3) - 7 = 5

therefore
3 + (4 x 2w) = 3 + (4x14)= 59

Attached: multiplyBeforeAddition.jpg (694x193, 13.5K)

yeah. imagine the slyly doubled jpeg in an actual math exam

Correct.

>the witch without wand

But of course the picture is niggery, and the witch in the final equation has no wand or broom.

And so...

Witch = 15
Wand = 7
Broom = 4

4 + (15-7-4) x 7 =

Order of Operations: PEMDAS (parenthesis first, exponents next, then multiplication and division, and last addition and subtraction)

4 + 4 x 7

4 x 7 = 28
4 + 28 = 32

Answer = 32

Attached: 1584547476532.jpg (780x438, 26.74K)

I see this shit enough in fucking Facebook why do I find it here user why

21 fuckface

Attached: 1586601137498.jpg (207x243, 8.95K)