Is being a woman living life on easy mode?
Is being a woman living life on easy mode?
Other urls found in this thread:
theblog.okcupid.com
twitter.com
Only if she's hot, young and sexy or cute.
for all the bitching about male privilege i hear, I sure dont have the option to show my body for money. Must be nice.
Yes
That is her dream house? I bought a house very much like that one at 24 and considered it an ok starter home. All without having to show my asshole on the internet.
Yes. Living life with no built-in sense of honor, living day-to-day at the beck and call of every emotion, being able to manipulate weak men with virtually no effort.... yes. Might even qualify as 'tutorial' mode, rather than easy.
The main downside of thots is that they don't think ahead.
Like giving a child a bucket of water in a desert. They'll drink it all up before the first day.
>being able to manipulate weak men with virtually no effort
The white knight and beta orbiter perk must be nice to have.
>22 female
>take mortgage out on house probably worth 165k--185k
>20-year mortgage at best
>Looks on hispanic women tank before 30
>revenue stream depletes before half the length of the mortgage
She better have a back-up plan. I recommend she sells the house if she sees the value rise by more than 10% in 2 years. Buy more properties and repeat. Otherwise she is fucked unless she is more than just a nice ass
Forgot comment. If this story is anything to go by, being a woman is easy epics, PROVIDED there are men present.
Yeah, the problem is a lot of boys think that all women deserve to be defended implicitly, instead of asking that they earn it.
So anybody have the pics?
sure you did bud
That's her dream home?
That's her dream house? Such low standards must by encouraging for her simps.
No.
Being really attractive as a man or a woman can net you some amazing benefits. The difference is that your average woman takes an interest in looking decent while your average guy doesn't and thus the average is pushed more toward slovenly for men. It's, in truth, a wash if a man dared to give a damn.
On the other hand when you look at sex distribution in occupation, women tend to take bitch jobs that pay a lot less while men are willing to work shit jobs that demand a lot but pay a fuckton more. This means that women are "marrying up" more on average and men are "marrying down" in terms of raw finances. The only thing preventing this from being a wash is the fact that women are physically weaker than men on average.
No one sex is "EZ mode."
When people look to the opposite sex and become envious? They're looking through the rose-tinted glasses of an apex logical fallacy -- they're not seeing the absolute dregs of society that also happen to be made up of men and women.
Be thankful for what you do have.
Not what you don't.
I did when I was in my 20s. I didn't get rich, but it helped me pay my way through community college.
>chcked
>ITT: actual incels
fuck is it ever. the receptionist at work, 3 kids divorce 2 different dads hooked up with some 3/10 rich cunt and lives on easy mode. she's chubby all tatted up and over 40
Yeah a down payment on a house isn't that much really, paying the mortgage, bills, taxes over a long period of time with an inconsistent income is a whole other ball game.
I'm quite vain.
Part of it is simply because I've realized more and more how shallow women are about looks (much more so than men).
Women marry up because they are more likely than men to desire a supporter, and more likely to find one.
And obviously there are men and women who just have it tough. But the average loser woman is going to have a better life than the average loser man.
>be woman
>get pushed into a dude who catches me
>guy who pushed me is instantaneously hit square in the face with haymakers
>is beaten to the point of hospitalization within 15 seconds
>my life is so fucking hard
Fuck off woman worshipping pussy. Women get more free shit, more scholarships, more grants, more affirmative action, more protection, more rights, and all with infinitely less expectations & responsibilities imposed on them by the state & society.
The only reason you *think* they can have it hard as well is because despite all their advantages and privileges women are still monumental fucking crybabies.
she must have a great poverty of imagination
If you are hot enough, yes you can.
As long as you dont mind that most of your clients are gonna be male.
>Sauce: been there, done that
What man makes enough money to buy a house just by putting naked pics on the internet? Being a woman is ezpz mode. You don't even need to leave the house or do anything that requires deep thought or hard physical labor over decades to get rich.You don't even have to be a hot woman to make money doing it. There's plenty of beta orbiters out there throwing money at fatties and uggos.
It's not hard to please mexican girls
in capitalist world which is shaped for interests if parasites
but if woman would unironically try to be normal and contributive it would make her an enemy of the society
>"Only if she's [a woman]"
It's really that fucking easy
No.
Women find 90% of all men to be unattractive, this is biology. If all men "took an interest in looking decent" then women would just choose the top 10% of those men instead of the "slovenly" average we have now.
It's abundantly clear you're a woman.
>how shallow women are about looks (much more so than men).
There was a TV show that they never tried after the catastrophy that was the first season. It was a dating in the dark type show. Men and women got to know eachother with never seeing what their chosen date looked like. It was fascinating. When the men finally got to see the women that they fell for, they were disappointed but almost every single man chose to give the girl a chance, even though the girl wasnt his type. When the women saw the men, there was no thought even involved, it was 100% an instant NO. While the men took the girls personality into the decision, not a single one of the women even thought about the emotional connection they formed with the guy. And I mean it was an INSTANT no. No hesitation at all. Just an immediate NO.
Proof that women choose looks first. No iffs ands or buts.
Yep. I had a conversation with a few female teenage coworkers, and they all thought I was crazy for thinking women were the more shallow sex.
I think half of the problem with women is that they don't even realize they have a problem.
yes
Depends on the woman. Lots of bloke have it easy too.
that house is small as fuck lol
Right up until you turn 29.
Yes
It's more of a factor of distribution of sex across occupation. If a woman is making twice that of a man the man in that relationship would be stupid to ask her to step down to raise the family.
Advantage in school doesn't translate 1 to 1 with later occupation which is far more determinate. The extra rights are in regard to abortion which is biological consequence. If you had a womb? You'd be afforded the same legal courtesies.
TL;DR: You're a whiner.
I already accounted for your apex logical fallacy.
>90% of all men are unattractive to women
>The men's appearances has nothing to do with it.
Pants. On. Head. Retarded.
>Only if she's hot, young and sexy or cute
Let me correct that for you
>MOSTLY if she's hot, young and sexy or cute
even fat orcs will get funded by lonely betas if said orc gives the beta a little attention.
uhhhh no. Men fart in front of you and you're raped literally every moment of the day and only make 2% of the average wage and have to deal with mandatory clitorectomies.
but seriously no it's horrible, you make almost as much as men, get shitloads of benefits because of your cunt, have decent specimens of the opposite sex throwing themselves at you every day regardless of how much of a fucking bitch you are toward them and have white knights who will defend you doing anything up to and including mass murder.
shit sucks bro
This
Also assuming being handsome, charismatic and manly gave you a distinctive edge in life, are most of you not going to make the most of it?
Especially knowing that you will hit a hard wall around 30.
90% of all men are not unnatractive to women because those men are without the physical attributes that one would ascribe to attractiveness.
90% of all men are not attractive to women because they are possess some minor defect that renders them less than perfect. There is no example more clear and obvious of this than height. Any man under 6ft can never, EVER do anything about it, and he is made unattractive for it.
You can whiteknight all you like but the realities of sexual market differences are ingrained into every living human no matter what race, nationality, creed or ideology. Your flat denial to acquiesce to the truth does not undermine it, it simply makes you out to be a fucking simp.
It's only easy if they maintain their looks with age.
Otherwise, they're useless fucking whores who will leech off desperate men in order to stay alive.
They deserve to be culled.
Jack the ripper was right.
Prove me wrong.
Oh wow, I thought you were trolling but that's the hill you actually want to die on.
>90%
Bullshit.
It's bad enough that your prior argument had the logical consistency of swiss cheese but the fact of the matter is that even if all one has to do is get up out of their dank smelling basement and go out their front door to see that *clear as day* there are plenty of couples out and about.
You're just objectively wrong out of the gate.
I mean hell, look at your parents. Probably not replacements for jessica alba and brad pitt.
>Height
Breasts.
Move on.
>I think half of the problem with women is that they don't even realize they have a problem.
That's very much my experience, believing men are at fault is so ingrained, they do not believe anyone else could be.
Classic examples are the topic of war or men not being able to show emotion.
> if men just were to (not) do these things the world would be better
> who do you thing gets the trophy/loot brought back into their safe and cozy home?
> if men could just express their emotions better
> who do you think taught and reinforced that behaviour in young men?
Also:
> young men are taught that women are worthless
> who do you think is teaching young children 95% of the time?!
I'm not saying women are solely responsible for these things, but they definitely carry some, if not most, responsibility in a lot of cases. Such is the way, when you share a society.
I think women who are ugly have it worse off than men who are. Men at least have a chance to get pussy and be successful without good looks. Women who get to be that ugly have zero chance
> Bullshit
Flat denial to acquiesce to reality.
> Breasts
Literally no man on earth has ever said "yeah she's beautiful but her boobs are too small so I'm not going to have sex with her."
Literally not one. Ever.
>Literally no man on earth has ever said "yeah she's beautiful but her boobs are too small so I'm not going to have sex with her."
>Literally not one. Ever.
this , also , women are attractive no matter their height , men on the other hand seem to be rejected even if they're perfect if they are a bit shorter than 6ft
>Literally no man on earth has ever said "yeah she's beautiful but her boobs are too small so I'm not going to have sex with her."
You're so delusional it hurts.
You're projecting your own desperation.
your faggy shrek pictures are not data.
OKCupids several year long information gathering on the habits of their users *is* data.
Deal with it, simp.
fucktard, house prices vary drastically depending on location, a 1 million dollar mansion in la is 300k in montana
Kek
>26 yo
>getting PhD in STEM this summer
>top 10 school
>credit already raised $20k -> $40k
>$500k already approved for mortgage
All before even getting a real job. Didn't need to drop so low in life to get something decent. Plus, it's an actual stable field of employment. Who cares if their life is on easy mode, I got standards.
>amy schumer
and tons of other talentless hags
Only if you win the genetic lottery.
Sugarcoat all you like. Your 20 years of debt aren't going away just because you dont mention them in an internet post.
What data? Your unsourced "info graph" that can be cobbled together in photoshop in 30 minutes that vaguely gestures at a single dating website?
Moreover a dating website is already a skewed sample. Go outside, bro. You're literally arguing against common fucking sense.
You know the funny thing about lottery? you can win less money than the jackpot.
STEM PhDs are essentially free. From my BS I only have $10k in loans.
There was never any money in the jackpot.
There is always some desperate incel out there.
That's a nice starter home for a 22 year.
1. Nothing that lists 90%. Still unsourced.
2.
>When we looked specifically at sending the first message, we found one striking habit: everyone’s a reacher, meaning people tend to reach out to someone more attractive than they are. To put a number on it, men are reaching out to women 17 percentile points more attractive, and women contact men who are 10 percentile points more attractive. This means that if a woman does nothing, her inbox will be filled with less attractive men.
Directly contradicts your premise.
You didn't even read your own source.
You are dismissed.