Covid 19 will disappear in 2-3 weeks. The virus has been contained in China and it has peaked in Europe and US too. The number of daily cases is decreasing rapidly. The measures taken by the governments are working well and we will be able to return to our normal lives in 2-3 weeks.
Covid 19 will disappear in 2-3 weeks. The virus has been contained in China and it has peaked in Europe and US too...
China is lying newfag. It’s not contained. It’s not contained anywhere.
it does almost nothing (2% mortality, and even that is after underlying health conditions lol) so who cares. mass hysteria and panic is causing 100x more damage than covid 19
Look at the bottom right graph, fag. It's accelerating exponentially.
Absolute lies.
it's here to stay, tubby
majestic trips rightly recognised
the devil is in the details. most of the dead have had underlying health problems. obesity, CVD, lung problems etc. Covid is cleansing the unworthy. Covid is a merciful God.
You can always get exponential bar when adjusting the X and Y axis. Moron.
You know you are posting in a...
Ah, fuck it
he is only half wrong. the virus will peak sometime next month. Fortunately its only killing the unworthy.
It's time to get off the internet, Mr. President. You have a busy weekend ahead of you...
I'm kind of enjoying this, though. I'm eating better, people are stopping this dumb SJW shit, celebrities are losing their ever loving minds, I'm getting projects done around the house, and we are seeing the people come together to help others.
I'm not seeing this as a bad thing.
OP said it peaked in the US. It's not peaked.
It's not after correcting for underling health conditions. It is mostly sick/elderly people, but they make up about 2% of the population. Not everyone is going to get it, but some virologists expect about 60% people to get it, and 1,2% of people dying is still quite a lot. That mortality rate only happens if hospitals can keep up with the incoming patients however, if not, then a lot of people that would have survived with adequate medical care will die, and it's impossible to tell what the mortality rate will be then.
Are you retarded? The axes are clearly linear.
ok i will give you 5% in the WORST CASE SCENARIO. Still acceptable losses considering how under prepared we were, fortunately this virus is a softie. Perhaps we will learn from this, and be much better prepared when something actually deadly strikes.
Fuk u meen cuh!
Migh niggas da Covid 19 run deez streetz, beotch!
Ill fuq u up cuh!
Wii ayent go in know wares!
*fires shots in the air in protest of his beloved low level street gang with his Mac 11*
What's stopping it from resurging just as aggressively once we relax our emergency lock-down measures?
terrible
The more people that get it and develop an immunity, the less it will spread. That's why we vaccinate against polio and measles.
5% is 1 in 20 people mate. Because I assume you know more than 20 people, I think you are probably going to stop make light of it pretty soon. It's alright to be scared.
And.. The idea isnt to stop people getting it - the idea is to slow the number of people having it all at once, because it will overload hospitals and the healthcare system, etc.. It will be even WORSE if we let it just run rampant.
It will disappear during lock down because there won't be any new cases and all people who are sick will either die (only 0.02%. thats lower than flue) or get better.
But certain regions will be untouched and be vulnerable to a local outbreak which could easily reignite another national or global outbreak
Wouldn't it take just 1 person to make it snowball again..
three week old pasta is clearly bullshit
>I assume you know more than 20 people
You mean real people or lolis as well?
It's actually 2%.
Also we won't eradicate this disease. We've eradicated other diseases only with the help of a vaccine and even then it can resurge as we've seen with old thought-eradicated diseases through antivax communities
>But certain regions will be untouched
Yeah maybe.
>local outbreak which could easily reignite another global outbreak
No. Because once we get it, we become immune, and shouldnt catch it again.
And if some people who didnt have it initially do get it the second time, we can handle that, beacuse they just need to self isolate for 2 weeks, and if it gets bad, they'll be able to access an ICU pretty easily by that point.
yes but that's because of the failure of the health care system, and not the strength of the virus.
This viral agent could have been a lot deadlier with much higher kill %. We have to learn from this and be much better prepared.
ppsst
Hey...listen to this..
Ive got a secret
But you already know what it is
are you listening?
You'll wanna hear this
>three branches will become one
Bill gates says we have to wait 10 more weeks in quarantine. that puts us at around June.
Ive been saying for a month now that JUNE is when it happens.
>Bilderberg 2020
>Event 201
>ID2020
>Agenda 21
>COINTELPRO
>REX84
>Project Zephyr
If you dont know about these things you dont even KNOW what the fuck is coming!
Get your sorry fucking ass Ready!
Nope.
A local outbreak somewhere might ravish that local community. However, it is estimated that covid infected people infect about 2 people on average. But if 50% of people are immune, then statistically all infected people will only be able to spread to around 0 to 2 people, so many infection trails will end.
The fact that any local outbreak will probably quickly be contained also helps. SARS has stopped being a big issue years ago, but if a doctor suspects you have it you will immediately be quarantined.
It is reaching peak in the EU where it has been going on way earlier, in the US it has barely started son, ready your knockers.
I know how immunity works. But you're talking like in 2-3 weeks every human on the planet will have caught and overcome the disease to build up an immunity. If we do get it under control in the timeframe you're talking about it will certainly not have infected enough people to build up herd immunity. And if it does get everyone in the next few weeks that's the nightmare scenario everyone is trying to avoid.
The only cure for this pandemic is for it to slowly creep through the population until almost everyone is either dead or immune. It's too contagious to fizzle out. That or we develop a vaccine which could be a year or more away.
The "bad" hasnt affected you.
also i should add that people are fucking unhealthy. Obesity and CVD runs rampant in the majority.
The virus itself is quite nasty. Many people above 50 will have permanent lung damage even if they survive.
You are right that the health care system, especially in the US isn't helping, but many other countries are having a lot of trouble dealing with it as well.
That said, the virus could have been a lot worse, but its seriousness should not be downplayed.
most people are recovering in under 2 weeks. i recovered after 1 week. This virus needs a person to be suffering from health related issues (hypertenstion, or lung issues) to kill. Otherwise it does nothing.
Wrong. this is just the start.
But that's what I mean. I know not everyone will get it, the idea is to slow the spread so 50% of the population doesnt overwhelm the ICU beds and all require ventilators.
Second time around, it will not be as bad, just isolate some people and wash your hands, done. It's only bad this time because its new and there is literally zero immunity out there, so its spreading to like 2 people each. Read this one:
if it currently infects 2 people, then with say half the worlds population immune (not enough for herd immunity btw), then that will probably drop to 1 or so. Easy to control, just like the flu.
>2% K/D
>mfw.gif
What if it was 50%? Fuck yeah
Nah, it’s still on the upswing here in the US.
Lol, how fucking stupid are you? you should probably kill yourself.
We either always have backup facilities in case of pandemics, or start quarantining people way earlier, in a next pandemic event. The health care systems, or any other systems that offer any service, were not designed to be able to handle the whole population at the same time.
I like some people who suffer from lung issues
This is the deadly one. Keep in mind this virus has only just started infecting humans, and it is not going away. at 5% that makes it 500 times more deadly than the flu virus. In my opinion, 5% is low.
Maybe you should say good-bye to them then.
You know the mortality rate is up to 5.3% right?
Its only 5% in the bad scenarios - literally when everyone has the flu they dont overwhelm ICUs, so its an apples to oranges comparison.
If you want an accurate death rate, compare it to the flu BEFORE ICU beds get filled up.
>You know the mortality rate is up to 5.3% right?
mortality rate for covid-19 is highly age dependent. its under
Infection rates are only going up, which means MORE "bad scenarios" not less.
Yes, but youre saying the mortality rate of the virus is 5%(ish).
Thats wrong, because currently we are not at ICU capacity and its killing something like 2.5% in the US atm. Australia has 0.5% death rate.
The death rate of the virus will be around 1-2%. The death rate due to lack of health care will be higher.
They aren't the same thing, but DO have the same outcome. The idea is to say in the future "if you get this virus, your chances of dying are 2%" - not "the ICU is empty, your chances of dying are 5-10%". Thats retarded.
Lol, you are fucking stupid. Have a good one.
The real death rate is something like 0.003% because it's predicted that around 11% of the population have been already infected.
Kek, yeah and it's predicted that hillary clinton will win the election.
source?
That guy is right, you're the retarded one.
if you breakdown the death rate by age then things actually become clear, and you realize that it does almost nothing to people under 50. the death rate is grossly exaggerated by large number of elderly deaths, something the mainstream media neglects to mention, esp in Italy.
I think people are forgetting that It’s only been 84 days since the initial outbreak, and they are coming this with flu statistics that is collected over the course of a year. When you compare COVID-19 to Swine flu at the same mark of 84 days after initial outbreak swine flu was able to kill 429 while in the same amount of time Covid has killed 53,159.
Yeah, and you know it's true because you just said so.
Is this virus really so bad? It's taking care of all of our unfunded obligations, cleaning the gene pool, getting rid of chronic medicare for the old, etc.
We will come out of this cleaner, and with more cash for gumment than we had before. Might even be able to pay down all this debt.
Don't forget to mention the increased amount of available test kits
>Come out of this
clearly you don't understand what is happening.
>53,159
>implying they wouldn´t have died anyway
>Might even be able to pay down all this debt
the virus won't affect the armed forces much so I doubt it.
>killing all the old farts on government benefits
how is this a bad thing?
OPs shit is all fucked up.
If you think that's all that is going to happen, you are completely clueless.