When you fap do you move your pets out of your room?

That's rape, I hope it isn't an oversized insertion. You should not do that.

I only have a little dick so it's ok

So are you attracted to cats, or is it purely a means of reliving your physical desires?

yes

Both, but I definitely love the feeling

Back in the day I hated when I was just sitting there jerking off sexting some (guy)irl on w1 lumbridge and my cat would come over and brush it's head against my legs like wtf

Found the african american

i always use my cot instead of handkerchiefs

You should consider paying attention to the interests of your partner rather than forcing yourself onto them. It should be a consentual act you both enjoy, not one of lust and brutality.

Kitty can't sleep on the rug while I'm sleeping? Why not user?

I think the cat likes it (most of the time anyway) so we're good together

Well when you say you have to trap her, that concerns me. You should not do it when she is not interested. Animals give very clear signs when they are enjoying something or not, whether it is sexual contact, or anything really. Are you attracted to people sexually at all?

Attached: 1564005438805.jpg (306x340, 39.97K)

I fuck anything and who cares if she wants it or not

Attached: 1565228360859.jpg (315x318, 38.61K)

You should care. Rape is rape regardless of species. It is called being humane, because we are the only ones who can do it. With all the pain and suffering inflicted on animals in our world, it can be easy to fall into the trap of thinking the harm you do is harmless. You cannot fix everything, but you can certainly do the right thing in this situation. Continuing this trend is unhealthy for you and your partner. You should be caring and attentive of their needs.

Your bait us shit

No, i dont care about them and they dont care about me, would be selfish of me to wake up my and move my pets every time i fap.

What? I wouldn't type all that out if I didn't believe it myself, and that it would be best for you and yours, but you have to do what you are comfortable with. Are you doing what is right? Are you hurting no one? These are questions no one can force you to answer, you must think for yourself. I hope you do not look back on your actions with regret, but rather with delight, that you made a change that was within your control. I see the post count increasing at a rate that is beyond "your" replies, so I cannot say whether you are the samefag or not. Either way, I urge you to consider how your actions reflect how you love your partner, and if they would have any complaints. Complaints that should be quite visible to you, should you choose not to ignore them.

> I see the post count increasing at a rate that is beyond "your" replies
>the only post made in the last 15 minutes

Attached: bait.gif (1000x773, 327.89K)

I mean, the same person may not be replying to me each time. The formatting is kinda inconsistent anyway so who knows, that's the beauty of no ID boards. What would be my bait attempt? I fuck dogs, and hope everyone is ethical in any zoophilic activities they partake in. If my advocacy for that is bait, then so it be. I'm not sitting here detailing the post counts, but your posts are wildly varied, and somewhat nonsensical. But if that's how you cope with raping your cat occasionally, then it makes a little more sense.

Attached: e3652be0b445c101aacdab0c254dd1422c3a1926.png (720x1280, 849.1K)

>I mean, the same person may not be replying to me each time
>your posts are wildly varied
get your shit together, that was my first post ITT and since the thread is kinda dead, this will be my last.

i dont care if my cat is there or not. but if she is there u come on her and watch her lick it off

Looks like my shit is together, as I was correct in my speculations. Enjoy the rest of your morning, or whatever time of day suits your locality.

Oh, it's the dogfucking rapist again.

Only one rapist here, and it's not me. Nonverbal consent is a simple, real thing, but seeing as you remember me, we don't need to go over it again do we?

Attached: bkrMq.jpg (1600x1200, 227.62K)

>why yes I fuck my dog
>it consents non-verbally
>I'm not a rapist

Attached: 1569729539675.jpg (621x621, 293.33K)

Can i get ummmmm... Ummmmm... Mint with chocolate chips

Attached: pobrane.jpg (275x183, 7.97K)

Oh shit wrong thread sorry yiffers

Don't let your subjective moral conventions blind you, just because it's not your cup of tea, doesn't make it wrong for those who ethically partake in it.

Eloise and Abel lived across the street from one another, but both of their families generally isolated themselves from each other. In many ways, that made sense. Though they occasionally interacted, the families had different routines and rituals, and they even communicated in different languages. In the town of Ocala, the likes of Abel and Eloise just did not mix. The opprobrium that attached to such mixings, though perhaps irrational, was immediate and severe. Despite these difficulties, Abel and Eloise became very fond of one another. Regularly, Eloise would meet Abel under the luminescent moon. The two would caress, expressing their profound affection. Partially overcoming their language barrier, Eloise and Abel began to sense each other’s emotions and eventually fell in love. Eloise labored mightily to keep herself away from Abel. After all, societal disapprobation is a disciplining mechanism, often trumping love. Yet, she failed. Despite all the obvious difficulties, Eloise’s visits to Abel became ever more frequent and ever more intense, but never overtly sexual. Eventually, a few neighbors began to notice Abel and Eloise’s moonlit escapades, but no one found the visits particularly troubling, not even the intensely judgmental teenagers in Eloise’s cohort. Feeling an odd sense of comfort despite her suspicions of “pernicious and sustained hostility” directed at her adoration for Abel, one night Eloise decided that the two should make love. They met in their usual spot, and the two quietly cuddled. Able breathlessly slipped inside of Eloise, a sublimely peaceful experience.

Because he's a alpha and your a cuck.

>Don't let your subjective moral conventions blind you
"Don't let that pesky morality blind you! Doesn't make it wrong, doesn't make it wrong! Here's an allegorical paragraph to rationalize why raping dogs is ethically right, even though I just said to ignore moral conventions".

You fuck.

You have no idea what you talk about. You are probably murrican because it's typical murrican to have an opinion but no knowledge. Dolphins rape, apes rape, there are a lot of animals which rape.

He just wants to fuck his dog.

Some people consider profanity immoral, others, masturbation. Premarital sex is often considered immoral. I'm telling you to consider whether your stance is one of morality, which is subjective, or one where you can objectively say no pain is being caused. I'm not telling you what to think, just showing my evidence to the jury. Do what you know is right. If you cannot say, without a doubt, that what you are doing is right, you should reconsider you actions.

>profanity
>masturbation
>premarital sex

>dogfucking
Fuck off. I have already objectively carved a clear picture of where pain could and likely is being caused for you, twice over. You're a fucking degenerate. Without a doubt.

And I strive to not be one of those. People rape, but I wouldn't assume you do that. You could do that, but it would be an unreasonable assumption on my part.

>I fuck my dog
>I strive not to be a rapist

And when was that? Where do you believe pain likely is being caused? If you are the drunken user from last week, let's do this.

>If you are the drunken user from last week
I am the one who fed you Sustitia twice, you half-brained simp. Take your facade of integrity, and fuck yourself raw with it.

If you were knowledge on the topic, as you accuse me of not being, you would understand that these points can coincide. It is up to the individual. Rape is rape, regardless of species. Anyone is capable of it, you must consider respect, responsibility, self control, and love of your partner in any sexual contact, or relationship in general.

>If you were knowledge on the topic
Dumbass.
>you would understand that these points can coincide
Does not fucking follow. Non-fucking-sequitur, you degenerate dogfucking dipshit. Rape is rape. That is exactly it. What you do, is rape.

Welfarism is the accepted ethical theory of interacting with animals

I was not in that thread after you replied.
>what is there to say, dog rapist?
>You must be aware of what a high stakes game you're playing, when you just could rub one out to regular furfag/animal porn on this board instead.
>The fact that you're shamelessly signaling your intentions is an upside at least. You're not alone int this, because since 1 or 2 years a lot of furfags considered themselves safe enough to advertise intentions like this in several places.
>Just a single slip up, in action or word, an unexpected camera, then it's either prison, complete isolation from family and aquaintances forever or even vigilante mobs looking to keep the dogs safe at all costs.

>You should do yourself and everyone else a favor and never put those plans into action

I did not make a single reply after this post, in the entire thread. All others. At least now I have the chance to respond, and so do you.

I'm willing to bet that you are completely fine with castration for purposes other than the health benefit of the animal? Such as those undertaken by owners everywhere for no reason other than their own convenience? If your argument was to protect the sexual autonomy of the animal, this certainly violates that.

You were in both threads when it was given. You absolute moron, this wasn't last week. I swear, every single one of you fucks have the mental wherewithal of a slug. It's always like this. There's some cognitive deficiency somewhere down the line, that halts all further thought and reason. A hang-up. Not just denial, but wholesale swiss-cheese brain. It's a given, seeing as how you dirt-licking dipshits compartmentalize the act of raping your pets on the regular. But, for fuck's sake.

He remembers.

Why don't you? For the sake of convenience? To appeal to nobody in particular? To relentlessly profess innocence to an imaginary nobody to fend off the plausible guilt and repercussions that come with fucking your dog?

Dumbshit.

I sleep with my dogs in my bed. Sometimes I use one as my pillow. I also let them lick my face. I also don't let them get into anything gross.

Convenience is a form of preference satisfaction and is accounted for in the welfare calculation. What kind of preferences is valueable and how valueable they are, well there's wide disagreement about that. Singer would choose a human being over an animal in the case of a boat sinking, Francione wouldn't.

Checked, and I'm not sure how we can debate, you have a right to your views whether I agree with them or not. I have quoted what I referenced, and you have quoted no other threads, yet are disturbed when I am not certain which one you are mentioning. You're not the only one I have had conversations with. You generalize me, when you have no clue who I am. Only one thing matters to you. I'd want you to meet me if I weren't so certain you'd bash my brains out, just so you could see who you're talking to. You can't tell me from anyone else. I look the same, talk the same, and despite your swiss cheese dreams, I have a fully functional brain that is recognized in my relationships with others, and my accomplishments both academic and personal. For you to judge my intelligence on my sexual preferences, just shows we cannot have a reasonable conversation on this. What are your views on homosexuality? If you are willing to carry this out in a reasonable way, I'll oblige, but I can't read your mind.

You should find yourself a woman

Nah coffee cake and shuichi are too stupid to know what’s going on lol

>In cases such as this, the is no centrist position if you take the time to plan out how this is gonna take place.
>If he's honest about it, he can take honest opinions about everything.
>This has nothing to do with love and the implications are numerous.
>Someone is going to buy and own a creature to satisfy his degenerate fetish for years. Suffering is in the package already from the beginning. Several 1000 days at least.
>What if something happens while he attempts to faciliate this horrid act or violates the creature? If the creature starts bleeding, is injured? Is he going to take it to the vet? NO HE WON'T, you know why.
>This has suffering by action and inaction tacked on to it on so many levels, any mention of love in that context is a crime

This entire post is based on inaccurate assumptions. First, it does have to do with love. I love dogs way too much to ever hurt one. That would hurt me. Second, this isn't a fetishistic behavior. It's a sexual preference. Sex does not hurt dogs unless it is an oversized insertion, which stay with your size, and no issues. There's big dogs and small dogs. If my dog was hurt, the vet would be the first stop. I love them, and care about their health. Should I face legal challenges that I disagree with, so be it if my dog is healthy.

oh shut the fuck up

Great one, friend

>and I'm not sure how we can debate
We already have. You offer nothing but trite and a deep-seated desire to rape your dog regardless of what's offered.
>I have quoted
You're still misattributing quotes. You've been misattributing quotes in all kinds of instances, including earlier in this thread. You. Know. What. I. Gave. You. Unless your brain is legitimately fucked beyond repair, which would explain everything.
>You're not the only one I have had conversations with
So learn to remember who you have conversations with, you mental midget. Context is everything, and you shine like a glow-in-the-dark dog rapist.
>You generalize me
>when you have no clue who I am
You make the same posts, you peddle the same talking points, your behavior and your reposes to stimuli are exactly the same as before, and you seemingly cannot resist signaling to the entirety of anyone who cares, how much you want to fuck dogs. Behold, a fucking dogfucker image of a fucking dog. Could be anyone! Checksums, what are those?
>I'd want you to meet me if I weren't so certain you'd bash my brains out
>just so you could see who you're talking to
I would still slap your brain out of your skull. See who I'm talking to? The same person who lovingly described how they fuck their dogs? Do you think, with your understanding of how I hold you in utter contempt, that "seeing" you would change anything? That would only serve to fuel my contempt.

Yes, I would slap the daylights out of you. You don't talk the same, you likely don't look the same due to your glaring eccentricities, and despite "my swiss cheese dreams", your middling shit-for-brains can't even manage the trivial act of discerning betweens anons and reply chains. Dumb fuck. I judge you, you dogfucking idiot. I judge you, because I have given you the fair shake, and I have watched you shit on the floor instead.

I judge you. Because you're retarded enough to conflate sexual preference with zoophillia- and then champion it. Dumb, dumb. Dumb.

And then there's the guttless fucking attempt to cast me as some kind of homophobic biggot.

You fuck dogs.