Yay or nay my brothers?

>t. Has no clue what the word pedophilia actually means

What does that mean for midgets

Wrong.

It's strictly about the AGE, not the body.

Try it out in court.

It's not illegal so arguing about it is a waste of time, unless you acknowledge that you're just being baby buttmad, pun intended

Why do you care? Is your life this empty that you have nothing else to do? At least everyone here is down for a quick fap. You live in this.

Pathetic.

Did I say the word pedophilia? I don't think I typed that word. If you're trying to make a distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia then don't. You look like a retard.

I'm asian, your argument is now invalid.

YAY

Attached: 1300855066094.jpg (320x213, 15.39K)

Attached: 00000020.jpg (1280x957, 153.46K)

>implying 18 year olds do

You're just in a thread about pedophilia making moralistic judgements about people raping minors, but not talking about pedophilia. And I look like the retard? Sure, Jan.

I didn't imply shit. I don't know what the appropriate age on consent should be. But I can fucking guarantee you it's not 14. Cope harder pedo

Attached: 00000086.jpg (1280x1280, 138.3K)

Attached: 00000048.jpg (1280x990, 142.29K)

I seriously hope people don't believe Asuka is a loli

>tfw you cross the date line on your eighteenth bday and the mysteries of the universe are revealed to you
>just dont cross again the same day and have to forget it all

I never once made a judgment about people raping minors. Either you are intentionally putting words in my mouth or you are unintentionally reframing the conversation due to a poor grasp of the subject matter. Not only did I never mention the definition of pedophilia, what I said did not require the defintion. You must have fucking worms in your brain or something.

Who cares? What matters is that young girls are generally unfit mentally and physically for sexual activity. Whereas lolicon is pure fantasy and loli’s can be cock-hungry succubus sluts that could give birth to Godzilla without any problems.

Attached: 00000179.jpg (1280x791, 83.26K)

> will be 100% mentally sound if a 20 something takes advantage of their naivete.
This is a blatant description of statutory rape you moron. There's definitely some brain worms going around, though. At least you can keep up with that.

Nope. Theres problems because moral busybodies will find anything to clutch pearls over. Especially victimless breaches of morals.

Attached: 00000137.jpg (1049x1046, 238.35K)

Attached: 1574807674311.jpg (1080x1255, 384.51K)

And what if I am one I don’t mind

Notice how the focus of that statement, and the entire paragraph you cut out, was not on the 20 something, it was on the child's mental state.

Maybe that particular part triggered you. It stood out to you because you have fucked children in the past. Just accept you are a sick piece of shit who deserve the fucking chair and get over it.

Does your argument work for any other simulated behavior?

And who cares? As long as they don't hurt an actual child they're free to be attracted to whatever they like.

lol

Attached: 00000139.jpg (1087x891, 192.51K)

I think the actual canon age and context of the content is more important in defining it as Pedophilia.
If it's a petite/short girl's body, she's 18+ and it's not straight up predatory style rape, then it's fine.
Even Loli where they are clearly not 18+, so long as the focus of the content isn't centered around straight up actual rape/ actual luring/actual grooming of kids, i think Loli should be legal.

I didnt think I would need to actually quote the whole post considering you wrote it, but that's clearly giving you entirely more credit than you deserve. Is the post not a description of the impact of statutory rape? Was the post not made in a pointed manner at another poster positing a moral stance? Christ it's like pulling teeth with you.

Attached: 00000162.jpg (927x1048, 77.2K)

For this to be a consistent argument I hope you also condemn all violence in all forms of media.

>Is the post not a description of the impact of statutory rape
No, it's not. And if you didn't have worms in your brain as stated before you would understand that.
But I'm sorry I'm not going to go in circles with you. Odds are if I repeat myself you continue to be an ignorant little shit cherry picking and putting words in my mouth like you've solely done up until this point.
It seems to me like you're trying to work out some guilt issues so I'll leave you to your own to figure your shit out.

Why am I arouse?

Attached: 00000235.jpg (1280x1024, 126.16K)

>it was on the child's mental state.
Hmmmmmmmmm. What do you suppose may be the most present and active influence on the mental state of a child who was just, and I dont want to put words in your mouth here, "taken advantage" of? Its almost as if the novelty of the mental state youre waxing intellectual about was brought about directly by statutory rape. Youre a dime a dozen in this world, have fun being intentionally obtuse.

Attached: 00000157.jpg (1000x1149, 361.18K)

This was never a matter of debate

You already said it was about the impact of statutory rape on the kid tho? right here >It was on the child's mental state
Youre even talking about how thier mental "soundness" as a result of the 20 yo "Taking advantage" here . Why are you trying to claim you're not talking about rape?

yea but most so called “lolis” don’t look like children just small girls

you dont get to make up your own definition of words or i will just call you a child rapist because my definition of that differs from the general definiton of the word.

hear that everyone, OP is a child rapist.

sauce pls

>consensual sex act
>consequences

Attached: 283478568934.png (860x697, 620.25K)

Totally agree, it's disgusting.

Absolutely spot on.
loli-fags just believe the mainstream media hype that all pedos are rapists.

Attached: 77914950_p0_master1200.jpg (1200x808, 980.67K)

Attached: 00000005.jpg (1227x690, 205.97K)

Oh, I get it now, you're just simulating your attraction to pre-pubescent girls and maybe boys. Gotcha

Attached: Felixxx_061002_uWK_59759098_p1-PetitCouple.jpg (1194x1967, 186.1K)

Attached: 00001186.jpg (633x530, 115.88K)

this is the cure for cancer

you have dozens of ancestors that were pregnant by 14

how does it feel to be spawned from generations of pedophiles?

>attracted
Well, no. Attraction isn't pedophilia, it's the deed. You can't throw someone in jail for having a dirty mind that he doesn't actually act on.

But more importantly, isn't the problem with pedophilia that it hurts children? Children that aren't physically capable of sex and mentally ready to handle the emotional relationships it tends to create?

So a vampire, demon, spirit, whatever, would be just fine for filthy horndogs to lust after.

Unless, I suppose, you're one of those people who think loli material will create more pedos.
Like when Lindsay Ellis said that Disney's Pocahontas could've caused native american women to get raped.

Attached: 2950034283.png (680x380, 367.36K)

>Well, no. Attraction isn't pedophilia
It sort of is in fact. Attraction is pedophilia. But you're correct about pedophilia not being criminal, since almost all pedos never hurt children. It's just the same as how most people attracted to adults never rape people either.

This post is so retarded that I'm almost certain it's a troll made to make lolicons look bad.

Attached: 00000026.jpg (1280x1877, 440K)

no u

>no. Attraction isn't pedophilia, it's the deed.
the deed of looking at kids is fucking sick you incel

Doesnt matter, hurting kids is bad dont do it anons.

Attached: 00000044.jpg (1280x720, 91.98K)