>Doom 3 is good because fuck Eternal Doom 3 was trying to be F.E.A.R with story as a top focus with voice recordings, jumpscares, redesigns of the demons that make the 2016 cyberdemon look good, and no fucking doomguy.
Doom Eternal and Doom 2016 resonates the feel of doom more than Doom 3 or that cancelled Doom 4 project (Call of Doom) EVER will.
>B-b-but story is in doom eternal too! >B-b-but muh arena shooter! platforming! >B-b-but it's not muh pixels and midis! I. Don't. Care.
In my eyes. In my personal opinion. Doom 2016 and Doom Eternal is how a proper modern Doom game SHOULD be. NOT Doom 3.
doom eternal is not a good doom game, but doom 3 is not a doom game at all.
Adam Ross
Considering Eternal was easily cracked, the contrarian crowd on Yas Forums have no excuse to try it out unless they have shit PCs(in which case, it would prove that most don't even play games)
Most of the whiners end contradict themselves with their complaints down the line("it has cut scenes" yet they'll say doom 3 was better, or "it's to easy" yet they'll complain that it has cooldowns and less ammo that are there to stop chessing etc) Just talk to them about the game, and their arguments will fall apart slowly, proving they didn't play jackshit.
>Both Doom3 and Doom2016 tried something different and both managed to make something new that works. Doom 3 was a slow halflife copy, made mostly for tech demo. Carmack never gave a shit about gameplay, he just made shiny graphics, same with Rage 1. Eternal improved most of the issues with 2016. The only things missing are modding and deathmatch multiplayer like the OG doom , not the outsourced shit 2016 had.
