It's that time to weed out the retards again

I bet you have a single bed.

No, son.
Not me.

Attached: 54F97546-B956-4AA2-9A41-407E8302F971.jpg (384x494, 60.37K)

ITT: small dicked wh*toids thinking that doing some weird ass math will ever impress even the ugliest of landwhales

Not an argument

You made that seventy up to fit your logic.

Attached: 1584809315191.jpg (321x475, 91.11K)

Yeah he supposed that the 2 sides were equal but we don't know

The rest is fine but the 70 seems entirely contrived.

180 is the key to the answer

Congrats OP, you weeded out these two retards, your thread was a success

Sub-par, lern2b8m8

Attached: 1494054768997.jpg (538x445, 61.62K)

How shall we remember this day, this day of culling?

My protractor says 32°

52movs.com/mov/54980977.php
chink says 30.

Wrong

The chink is wrong.

prove it

Attached: prove it.gif (220x172, 287.19K)

70

without any lengts specified i gotta make measurements to solve this one right. imma stop here

Attached: angles.png (577x849, 74.6K)

Correct

/thread

Attached: 1584809034993.jpg (309x451, 45.46K)

Only correct answer without any lengths given

(40+x)+y+30=180

x=110- y

what’s x?

Attached: zangles.png (561x816, 66.13K)

how can a triangle have 190 degrees mr. trips?

It doesnt matter what the lengths are. The only thing that matters is the angle. There's your hint.

See
The chink did the same thing. He just asserted 30 for the angle and worked from there to justify his answer.

>111
witnessed

How do you people so confidently make these specific assertions yet always, ALWAYS fail to specify what/where exactly they're talking about?

Where do the angles of any of the triangles in that picture add up to 190 degrees?

I've a feeling I won't be getting a (real) response from you.

yeah i mean i saw that one and plugged it in to check/verify, and it checks out. regardless of HOW he got TO it with the information given, it IS the correct answer.

You can't assert that the other angle of the triangle is 80 and the remaininder of that straight line is 50 to fit your math.

I don't know where you got the bottom 2 angles for the top triangle from but the peak is 10 not 20

It's not. Do the math. Law of Sines.

Attached: 1584809034993.jpg (309x451, 31.95K)

all of the angles, lines, and triangles check out to 180.
20+60+30+50=160. what is 180-160? 20. the top is 20.

Attached: xxx.jpg (309x451, 57.12K)

X=50

you do the math then. show your work. prove it.

Idiot, if X = 30 as you said, then why are the angles in that smaller triangle not adding up to 180? Answer me

easy

Attached: 1584809034993.jpg (309x451, 25.95K)

That works. However, if you changed that 80 into a 60 then x=50. I guess both answers are valid

Wrong. See

>EZ

you can't prove the distances in the equilateral triangle you drew are equal, you just assumed they are. without any information of distances in the original figure, it's impossible to prove an equilateral triangle exists such that all 3 of it's vertices touch the edge of the figure. especially in a convenient way yours does, so that you can create other triangles.

x=60º

I respectfully disagree with you

True. Furthermore, you can't split an angle to suit your solution.

it can't be solved using the givens simply algebraically, you're going to have to add to the diagram or use a measuring tool like a protractor

Attached: calculate.jpg (750x920, 449.19K)

Y'all stupid. Law of sines

Attached: 1584752739331.jpg (309x451, 60.2K)

Retard

Work

Attached: 20200320_212120.jpg (1536x2048, 1.48M)