Pedophobia is simply no longer acceptable nowadays.
We conquered racism when we freed the slaves.
We conquered sexism when we gave women the right to vote.
We conquered homophobia when we legalized homosexual relationships.
We conquered Islamophobia when we opened the borders.
Next we will conquer pedophobia when we abolish the abolish the ageist institution that is the age of consent.
Love is love, bigots.
Other urls found in this thread:
based
Your conclusion is the exact opposite of your evidence. By your evidence, within 50 years pedophilia will be free from the shackles of oppression and those who suffer from it will be able to live as they like without fear of violence.
Nice try though.
Uh oh...no you rape a kid around me and you a tent put in jail I'm going to form a lynch mob and date you to come outside. You'll need food eventual)ly.
Pedophobia is a fear of children, not a fear of pedophiles. You've misused that word horribly.
adults having sex is what causes cancer.
outlawing sex with anyone over 14 is the cure for cancer
youtube.com/watch?v=kp1bZEUgqVI
That's not a very progressive thing to say. Why are you such a hateful bigot?
Child lover rights are human rights.
In 50 years you're going to have to explain to your friends on reddit why you didn't stand up for pedo rights before it became the thing to do. Do you really want to be that person?
I can only accept 16 and above + lower 20years difference, agree?
No that's still ageist and oppressive.
Blow your brains out, pedophiles.
You make a somehow convincing argument....too bad that you're fighting for a "cause" that goes against every natural behavior,moral and law.That being said kys.
is the cancer epidemic a fair price to pay for that morality?
fpbp
why does every law only exist to spread cancer?
you're cancer. so is your mother. and your face.
cancer is cancer you lunatic
Not only is pedophilia natural, but also perfectly moral and sensible because children are sexual beings and have the right to intimacy just like everyone else.
Love between an adult and a child is still love.
Retard.
Like those guys in prison cells.
Nice b8 faggot
It's funny how conservatards fight against all those things but when it comes to their own sexual preferences they take credit.
>mfw all the jerks in this thread
You are fucked in the head and this will never happen you sick piece of shit human, victimize yourself all you want you will never have your pedofilic way
I like how people act like pedophilia is this horrible thing when it's been.morally acceptable for almost all of history. Age of consent wasn't even a thing until the 19th century
we just want to fuck tight young pussy and maybe breed it to make more young pussy for us or other young pussy lovers to fuck
pretty much
Three question is though. Who's gonna stick with their loli/shota as they age and who's gonna drop'em for more younglings
depends on the bond they formed. if it's romantic, they'll keep them, if it's purely sexual, they'll drop them and get a new kid.
it's not that different from playboys who date girls when they turn 18 and drop them once they're 21 and get a new fresh out of highschool girl
I'd have a harem, take in a little girl or two every 5 years and impregnate them between the ages 14-30.
I'd care for all the women I made families with.
Good point
Good idea
Going with both of you guys there's this loli I'm really close to and I could see a future with her, and maybe if I give her kids I can satisfy my pedo urges with the kids. I still find adults attractive anyways so I don't see myself dropping her
You know that's not the reason. I'm ccomplete degenerate and I have shota and loli saved on my PC as much as the next weeb, but nothing you're saying is relevant to why we have the laws and views about this. Naturalism is a fallacy. Killing and shitting in public is "natural" too. It's not about children not being sexual, it's about the adults taking advantage of them being stupid retards.
You just need to make sex outside of marriage illegal and remove women's rights.
Women are mentally children eternally so no matter the age you get with a girl you are taking advantage of them being stupid retards.
You're right. We have the laws because sex is icky and the devil's play, that's much better.
you should go for it.
think of it this way. you're gonna have your controlled space to indulge in your pedo needs. you won't be going around fucking random kids that you have no connection to. these will be your own
We need to reverse all of that
I was waiting for that, I knew that'd be the response. You're now wrong, though, it's already sailed. You'd need a religious takeover for something like this.
No, because it's a deep part of human psychology. "she's not hurt by eating a little of my semen, like, shes not going to die lol"
it's about psychological damage and fucking people up in the head. A kid who gets diddled by his dad might turn into a mentally ill tranny drug addict as an adult for instance. We don't have the laws for individual cases, its bfor broad seeping generalizations. Nobody who's honest would say there aren't loads of individual cases that would be fine and cause no damage.
Guise last night I had a dream I was covered in hundred of little bugs so I stuck them in my belly button and eventually they all oozed out as a mess of crushed bugs and belly button gunk.
What does it all mean.
For instance, there was a discussion just higher in the thread about what to do once your loli comes of age, and about dropping and getting a new one. Don't you see a problem with that? Isn't that enough to leave her fucked in the head, used and thrown away? 99 percent of you are just attracted to the lack of maturity and "innocence", to be used as a human fleshlight. Then you go and hilariously preach about "love".
>No, because it's a deep part of human psychology.
So deep we had child marriages for centuries.
The existence of psychological damage from sex is supported only by weak science reminiscent of the scientific evidence for racism. There is no psychological damage, any more than skull shape determines a black mans ineptitude for work.
Child marriage was not anything to do with your reasoning. It was lfie partnership, not degenerate attraction to having a human fleshlight.
>There is no psychological damage, any more than skull shape determines a black mans ineptitude for work.
I get your point, but race is real and genetics are real.
it was never about love for me. always about sex. kids are human fleshlights and that's what i want them for.
if any girls turn out to be pregnant from it, even better, more for me to use.
but this was never about love.
sure some pedos might develop romantic feelings for the kids, but for most of us, it has nothing to do with love and all to do with lust
At least you're being honest.
I'll be killing you're kind once White Sharia prevails.
Children are NOT sexy. Their mom on a dry spell however . . .
>The existence of psychological damage from sex is supported only by weak science reminiscent of the scientific evidence for racism.
in other words it's taboo science in modern times but absolutely real and true in both cases
>Child marriage was not anything to do with your reasoning
user, not all marriages are sexless affairs. This attitudes that demonizes sex as something disgusting is contemptible. Sex done right is mutually enjoyable, in fact it is downright beautiful.
Aw hell yeah I need more chomo wrecking pics like this. This will do good for now.
Pic related is my dream for chomos.
You're arguing with a strawman. I never preached any anti-sex purity. I'm talking about people like , and you, if you were honest.
i'm not here to troll or to go on about psychology or how thing were in the old days.
i'm just here to state my opinion on the matter from my viewpoint.
pedophilia is no different than any other fetish. and it's driven by lust, not love. same as zoophilia.
kids outside sexual scenarios do nothing for me. a kid just walking around won't get me aroused. what'll get me aroused is if he or she are fucking
Death is forever, pedo.
Men are naturally attracted to younger girls so pedophilia is not a fetish.
Saying it is "degenerate" is pretty close to saying it is impure. If I may indulge in some wordplay I would say far from degenerate it is generic.
>Nobody who's honest would say there aren't loads of individual cases that would be fine and cause no damage.
Honestly I'd be fine if as a society we could just get to the point where we accept this and are to openly state it, and revert back to a time when we would just sort of turn a blind eye to these things and not get law enforcement involved where it's not necessary.
Nowadays it's like a competition for who can get the most pedophiles EXPOSED and all that witch hunt nonsense, which is some really toxic stuff and warranting of a civil rights movementish response of some kind.
>troll thread to ruin the reputation of pedos who don't have a broken moral compass
>everyone falls for it
We're doomed
completely different things for me.
i can see some highschool girl and find her hot and want to fuck her. but if i see a kid that's cute, i won't have any sexual attraction towards the kid. my attraction towards the kid would only occur if it were a more sexual setting, such as full nudity. if the kid was completely naked, then i'd be interested. but a fully clothed kid won't do anything for me, whilst a fully clothed teen will
Well, I'm a moral nihlist, so I can't claim to be any better or higher than you, but I am still a human with a brain with chemicals that cause me to have preferences, and I, like the majority of modern humanity, have an anger towards people like you. I understand it's entirely self-serving and I just prefer not to see it, but that is my response.
No they are not. Men are naturally attracted to youth and fertility signs, so hebephelia is natural, not pedophilia, regardless of the modern mistake of classing attraction to a 13 year girl as "pedophilia"
That is just my opinion just as the guy stated his. I can't help seeing it as just as degenerate as a naked man shitting in the middle of a street.
Lynchings did not stop the civil rights movements, some things transcend such concerns.
are able*
the civil rights movement was also devastating to black people and the black family. Be careful your rights movement doesn't end up destroying your community.
I think the idea is that pedophiles pair bond with girls just before they enter into puberty so as to secure them as their mates.
I like some good milf pussy
> I can't help seeing it as just as degenerate
I don't like most fetishes out there. The difference between us is that I understand that my own disgust is a rather triflin thing which gives me no right to others affairs.
That's probably a thing that happens with humans in a nature setting. I would argue that is not the case 99 percent of the time, just as honest user above admitted it was everything to do with pure lust and nothing to do with love or pair bonding.
You might say that, maybe. It is certainly very speculative to put it mildly. On the other hand, I don't remember the last lynching so there is that.
Well after reading all those reliable peer reviewed scientific research papers you cited, I'm convinced.
>rights
if you're going with imaginary ideas like rights, do children not have the right not to be groomed and taken advantage of? How, in your society, would you determine if it's "proper", or just a lustful beast wanting a human flashlight to use and throw away?
Instead of lynchings, they're having babies out of wedlock, single mothers, high crime, etc... but no lynchings so everything must be fine
Society has officially become way to woke
The burden of proof does not lie on me, but on the one making the frankly fanciful claim that rubbing a pussy leads to a host of severe mental issues. What would the biological mechanism even be for that?