< This

See this here is a pefect example of what I'm talking about. If you all werent a huge bunch of cunts i would have posted the document in its entirety last night.

The simple fact is, the document is genuine. It was provided to me directly by a Doctor. The stats in it are genuine.

I dont give two shits if you think its fake or not because i have no way of proving it unless they release it into public domain, which as of yet they have not.

Now again, go get yourself infected. Or keep going, your choice, your amusing me while i drink my beer.

which they are
private sector is side stepping the federal process and beginning to test more frequently

I hope your entire family and circle of friends die from this virus.. Then you’ll understand why

>I'll take your job

Your extensive experience with giving BJs does not qualify you for real work, sorry.

Fidel Sanders will buy more stuff with his payoff,
remember, "No Refunds!"

Attached: Bernie Bullies attack Hillary voter.webm (400x272, 1.92M)

Yes that’s true the W H O does care..

I bet they put a noose around her next and told her this is Trump county.

You realize of course, the disease is real.
The spread is real. The threat is real.
What is unreal is self-interest Trump has in dealing wit the crisis in America. He is basically manipulating what he says so the stock markets alternately crash and soar. He knows what he's going to say and when. He and his cronies prepare with purchases/shorts at the appropriate times.
Look, I know you're all scared, but you really ought to be preparing for the worst while hoping for the best. Shows of bravado and making stupid claims is really just being a cute little edgy teenie and will not help you.
At the risk of causing panic, consider only the 'concluded' rates. For example in Italy there have been 1441 deaths versus 1966 that have recovered of the 21157 cases reported. We don't know what is going to happen to the 84% who haven't either died or recovered. So if you consider only those whose disease has run its course, you are looking at a 42% mortality rate.
arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html?fbclid=IwAR2v484sNIyz4XcnG4mGAj5VfukQixsdpcEVH_Kmn8m8A8PvNjrovLcPgAQ#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

Attached: ItsMuchHigher.png (585x915, 82.78K)

uh what? lol no