Help me troll this Bernie shill Yas Forums

I really hope you're a wealthy person. If not, your post is very ironic and almost funny.

Growth being the primary sign of success for a business doesn't mean it's necessary to survive. All industries growing larger and larger is a result of basic human psychology, ie greed and not part of capitalism. Your grouping several problems of human society together with capitalism, blaming it for everything. Capitalism literally just means treating everyone financially equally, nothing more.

No doubt, but a company is not required to grow to be profitable.

Probably wealthier than nearly everyone on this board, but that's pretty immaterial to my statement, which is factual.

>Capitalism literally just means treating everyone financially equally, nothing more.

I've heard that definition before. I think you just made it up. Did you a know a billionaire can do the same crime as you but serve much less time? This is very well documented. Shocking isn't it.

>"gas noncontributers"

Yes, very factual. Not an opinion at all. You're so smart, you deserve all the money.

well if a person with an iq sufficient enough to get rich uses that potential to actually do it, why should the person keep everything for itself?
the person that just got rich benefited and benefits from society, therefore there should be a symbiotic thinking. if the fkn fungus in the forest grounds gets its hands on more nutrients then it will pass that % on to the tree roots in knowledge that it will get more sugar back (because more sugar can be stored in the roots due to more nutrients being available).

transfer that stupid picture on to society. you (the fungus) gets rich (gets more nutrients) and gives a share of it to society (tree roots), gets more sugar (privileges) back.
why should the fungus keep the nutrients for itself, let parts of the root system starve, weaken the whole system and eventually get less sugar out of the symbiotic relationship? you dont know? idk either.
i dont understand how people that can afford a certain stability and wealth in life are contra boosting potential newcomers that would benefit society even more than they did on their own.
fund potential

Lol the guy is totally outplaying you dumbass

I'd hazard a guess that billionaires commit crimes at a rate far lower than people in society's lowest strata. Did you know that blacks in poverty commit many times the rate of violent crime that whites in poverty do?

You're still missing the point. The point is that a capitalistic government doesn't distribute wealth in any way, therfore not "assuming" anyone "deserves" anything. You take what you can get and government doesn't mess with that, therfore giving everyone equal chances.

I was referring to the relationship of IQ to income, which is very poignant considering
>does not make you inherently superior in some biological...
which is exactly the case.