Thoughts on this?

Thoughts on this?

Attached: It's okay to be a lolicon-min.png (2400x1917, 942.19K)

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.me/19495298
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

its biology

C

Big ol chart of "Thinking with your Dick." A chart for boys.

loli facts don't care about old fat feminist feelings.

I think that it represents shit taste because 14 is too old

what's the perfect age to you?

12

8

Puberty duh. Do you remember how horny you were when you were 13-15? It's just the way hormones work.

See, this is a pedophile. Hebephiles are just normal people.

based
into the fire you go

7-8 for me too, they're just too sexy

No u
1 in 100 men are pedophiles, seems pretty normal to me. Liking prepubescent girls is patrician taste

INTO THE FIRE YOU GO

> Article originally published 1993

Any social studies done 28 years ago is only usable as toilet paper or some history memes today. Do you even college bro?

14 yo is peak, confirmed.

Attached: 2014-07-24_q2lWiNOSI-.jpg (640x640, 92.82K)

See they’re already whores, not pure like 8 year olds

Only if you're a commie retard who thinks everything is a "social construct" because your professor said so. Imagine if we had to re-prove every theory in every field every x years for anti-science sockjuicers to accept it

It's because life wants to accelerate in growth. To expand like a tree branches. Unfortunately, pedophilia is a consequence of that escalation of fertility rate

Very true

Attached: 2014-02-22_kvz1rnNuT8cpvnWiF9EeRM3OnzqAXicUBkh-40.jpg (640x640, 54.88K)

We DO.
You clearly do not science.
Every single day, we have to reprove the theories and methods of the past. If we want a gravitational constant, we have to get it ourselves AGAIN, as opposed to using the known number, this is to ensure NOTHING changes, ever.
You clearly know nothing about the scientific method.

>you clearly do not science
Redditfag

strawpoll.me/19495298

>arbitrary
I'm sure you know how to tell if someone is from reddit, and you're not trying to deflect because you cant defend against my argument.
Just say "I was wrong", its easier.

why isn’t 6 an option?

We should not be fighting biology. It's time to correct fascist nazi laws. No love is illegal.

Except gay love

Make your own poll faggot

No. love is love.

>If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Everyone hates you pedo. Your parents friends and coworkers would want literally nothing to do with you if they knew what you do in your free time. You should just end it honestly.

fuck off cristfag

Why are you so full of hate? Who hurt you?

"This study examined men’s heterosexual attraction to adult women and prepubescent girls. The 80 men were recruited through newspaper advertisements, and therefore were not necessarily representative of the general population."

"Upon arrival for the study, subjects were informed by the female graduate student experimenter about the requirements of the study and that the results of the study would be confidential and that they could withdraw from the study at any time. Subjects were screened out if they were under medication or other drugs. None of the subjects reported experiencing sexual dysfunction.
...
Eighty-six persons called to inquire about the study but did not schedule appointments to participate in the study. Twenty-two persons scheduled appointments but failed to appear. Nineteen subjects withdrew from the study after the requirements were explained to them. One subject completed self- report measures, but not the physiological assessment, and one could not understand English and was eliminated from the study.
...

Slides of frontal views of nude prepubescent female children, nude adult females, and slides of clothed prepubescent female children were presented, two slides per category per session."
Geeeh I wonder what kind of person will say yes to watching some CP and getting of scott free.

Also I can't find the data shown in the graph anywhere in the paper. Where do I look to find the attractiveness by age? So far the paper hasn't even hinted at having this info.

9 is the perfect age.

The people dropping out were probably pedos who got spooked

the problem is most men are too afraid to admit their attraction because of the undeserved stigma that has been fabricated around this attraction.

Got a follow-up paper that denies these findings?

A newer paper would be better sure, but do you have one?

A 28 year old paper might not be ideal, but it still sheds a hell of a lot more insight than pure speculation and opinion, which is all you've got.

It’s not just me, like I said everyone hates you. Society thinks you’re less than garbage and I have to agree.

>quoting the bible.
Hello moron.

28 years is incredibly outdated and the only reason you won’t admit that is because you like the findings in the paper. No academic would reference a 28 year old study.

U

>I have to agree.
Why?

Attached: ldkux5tt50j41.jpg (895x1023, 368.06K)

>kid diddling garbage calling anyone a moron
I bet the FBI is laughing at you rn

>this paper does not at all remotely give ANY opinion, and has a total return in participants of about 40, way too few to even think it could make a claim.
Do you have a study? I'm still waiting on one that isn't clear trash.

Because you’re trash, duh

My fantasy is to get seduced by a cute little girl

>assumptions
I came here to see what kind of studies would be quoted, nothing good.
But, the furthest thing you could get from truth is the bible, the least substantiated document in history.
There is so few accurate accounts in it, it's not even accepted as an idea as to what COULD HAVE occurred at that time, given that what we discovered occurred at that time was entirely different than described by the bible.
God lies numerous times, despite being unable.
God is evil numerous times, despite being unable.

N

Sheep.

Haven't been able to find OP's chart in the paper itself.

A picture on Yas Forums is NOT a scientific paper.
>A 28 year old paper might not be ideal, but it still sheds a hell of a lot more insight than pure speculation and opinion, which is all you've got.

Dunno what to tell you other than that this is wrong. If you extrapolate or speculate ANYTHING out of a 28 year old paper in social studies/psychology that even admits that it's sample is shit then you're getting an F on your paper.

N

I’m not even him bro. I’m just calling you pedo garbage. But keep writing paragraphs like a sperg.

This.
Youd get thrown out of the class for trying stupid shit like this.

Your family hates you, they just don’t know it. Have fun living a secret life of shame. It’s what you deserve.

Attached: *tips*.png (479x455, 203.08K)

false data
there was an article debunking that

>I'm not even him
Next you'll say it was all a joke!
Matthew 21:18-22 NIV

>strawman because I cant prove him wrong.
K

Y

Attached: 1583179853057.jpg (371x331, 36.62K)

The chart isn't about the female, it's about the male. 95% of females aged 13-17 were found to be attractive to "normal men".

i am fordy year old

Believe what you want schizo, there’s a poster count at the bottom. Not my fault you’re a retard who can’t read.

His family would have hated him for being gay a few decades ago. Sometimes society is in the wrong.

95% of females aged 13-17 were found to be attractive to men who said yes to watching some CP with no consequences.

No need for the quotation marks, just say it like it is instead.

Yas Forums isn't an academic journal.
The findings might not be completely reliable due to the age of the paper and the questionable sample size. But they are certainly enough to warrant consideration and discussion.

Refusing to even consider the possibility that the study may in fact have some truth to it, simply because it was not published in the last 4 years hardly seems like an academic response either.

Jesus fags need to fuck off. Your fairy tale bullshit does not belong in a modern civilized society