*absolves self of any rensponsibilty for ones own actions*

*absolves self of any rensponsibilty for ones own actions*

Attached: e47.png.jpg (680x483, 80.58K)

Bors is a faggot but I don't get what you mean.

Indeed, how could anyone be responsible for following through with the one possible outcome of the lives. You gonna hold the rain accountable for falling?

More like

*Delegitimizes any attempt at changing any societal status quo*

>Bors
more like boring amirite

Is this the worst straw man ever created?

Imagine having to strawman this hard to defend your bourgeois product

Attached: 1_XRa2SMveRrEtfEyfODHrcA.png (915x657, 417.02K)

>hashtags are acting
>It's not my fault if things I enable with my money are bad because I am a GOOD person, and corporations are evil
lmao

The problem with this argument is that the bottom two panels imply an improvement to the product or subject itself (the car, society). If someone used an iphone and said "iphone should have longer lasting batteries" then that is the equivalent statement and it would in fact be ridiculous to say people who buy iphones can't complain about features of the iphone.

Buying a car doesn't prevent seat belts from being made. Buying an iphone inherently supports unethical business practices. This argument is especially bunk because there are competitors you can totally support with little loss.

>How can i debunk this strawman?
>By proving it right of course!

Attached: 5bbd1f40c5e062539940db96309ffdf08f8a9834d0e7d5ee4ba44909beb87cf2.jpg (200x176, 17.01K)