154 IQ

>154 IQ
>Smarter than 1 billion random Pygmies
>Smarter than 100,730 random West African males
>Smarter than 355 random Euro Males
>Smarter than 112 random East Asian Males

Life is insane.

Attached: 1528051034930.jpg (433x433, 37.98K)

Other urls found in this thread:

iqcomparisonsite.com/iqtable.aspx
splushka.com/intellect.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

We got a very smart boy here

im 130 and genuinely look down on every person i interact with with disdain, whats it like for you?

And still you wound up here. Life is a joke.
honk honk

I don't look down on people and I am friends with 100 IQ. I can be very arrogant and conceited, but I know I'm not god just because my mind is faster.

It does feel, at times, that I am interacting with children in adult bodies. But I know they are not kids and respect them for their own innate irreplaceable talents and skills.

And I mostly only feel that they're children because of how foolish and crazy the average person is, not because of my IQ.

That's because you're truly high IQ. A smart man is empathetic, understanding and accepting unless given no other choice but to despise. Only a low IQ man like that user can be judgemental, it often results from insecurity and narrow mindedness. A narcissist is unintelligent, a moral man is the opposite. Good on you, user.

We just met, girl, I know
But you had me pressed on arrival
Spent too many nights on my own
Now you're all I see when the light's low
Is it hard to imagine being one?
Am I reading it right, tell me am I wrong?
You seem unsettled, touch my arm
Just keep the pressure mine til dawn
We'll get out of town, leave the coast here
It's a two day drive if we both steer
Make sure to pack for the cold years
And we'll be just fine if we're close, dear
If you lose interest, leave me to die
No it wouldn't be the first time, I won't mind
You call me pathetic, at least I tried
Couldn't keep these feelings tucked inside
Oh, I'm on ice
Can't you tell?
I'm on ice
My heart's so still

you're retarded, if you had an iq that high you'd be smarter than like 8 billion people not 1,000,100,000.

also taking an online iq test doesn't mean you're actually that smart. i think i'm above average but no genius, i've scored upwards of 170 on those.

Attached: 1555349432864.jpg (555x505, 19.09K)

Feeling threatened by OP?

The truth is you have to subtract 12.5 IQ points from your IQ. Men are the only humans capable of anything and they're smarter than women. The average white male is 112.5 IQ when healthy, 92.5 IQ when unhealthy. Asian is 118.5

154 IQ is definitely real.

And use this website, 154 IQ is not 8 billion people

iqcomparisonsite.com/iqtable.aspx

nigga that is a joke about traps

you know those online tests are fake right?

The Serebriakoff IQ test on splushka.com/intellect.html is real. (Right side of website)

It's the only IQ test that exists that can handle Autism. All of the other ones demand perfect working memory or you get the wrong answer.

Pic related, the guy that built the test on the left. A literal Loony Toon that designed the test without help from other intelligent people.

Attached: John_C._Raven.jpg (2318x3099, 497.88K)

>All of the other ones demand perfect working memory
no they don't unless you're talking about other online IQ tests
you clearly have no idea how real psych administered IQ tests work

And I scored 123 on the Raven's Matrices and then 146 on the Serebriakoff the first time I took each test while having autism. I was only supposed to score 133 on the Sere if the scores were truly inflated, but went 23 points past the ravens test instead because I have diagnosed Autism with impaired working memory to boot.

>No they don't

What is this test question if not for a test of how well you can hold a picture in your brain?

And it's actually splushka.com/intellect.htm

Attached: Ravens.gif (448x480, 3.03K)

>Raven's Matrices
that's the only legit test user, yu're smart but not 14x iq smart sorry

No it's not.
Trust me, on the Neurotypical populace that are all schizophrenic, bouncing off the walls with power, the RPM is absolutely a perfect tool to get their IQ.

If you give it to an Autistic adult male, he'll score higher on the RPM than his IQ battery.

I technically only have an IQ of 105 on paper. I took the RPM and scored 123, but it's still close to that original test. I took the Serebriakoff, the test that pulled out all the stops and demanded pure intelligence, and scored 154.

It's not a joke.

is it 7? I think it's 7. This is the real kind of test.

that question doesn't "demand perfect working memory"?? the picture is right in front of you
anyhow working memory is an important component of IQ

if your working memory is shit then your IQ is also shit. that doesn't mean you're not intelligent.

I mean, if you compare the way I write to someone with an IQ of 105, it's obvious that I'm way smarter than that.

I think that is it 3.

scientists agree that the raven test is the most objective meaning it's the one most closely corelated to the general intellgence factor g
sorry lad, you're just a bit above average

>If your working memory is shit your IQ is shit

That's not true.
I've solved philosophical problems that no normal man can. Superior thinking to Nietzsche. The intelligence and power remains. You can't get rid of it even if the working memory isn't there.

>The picture is right in front of you

And you have to manipulate the shapes in your mind to get the right answer. It is literally math, and people with more working memory are better at math than people with less.

Utilizing the internet to carefully articulate yourself is a whole lot different than free flow expression of thoughts in real time.

>it's obvious that I'm way smarter than that.
user...
I hate to break it to you but it's not.
only deeply insecure people put any serious thought into IQ tests beyond their impact on clinical diagnoses

It is objective, but only on Neurotypicals.

That's why you see so many women running around with 160-180 IQ. They are all lunatics full of extreme power, and their IQ immediately shows up on paper.

>solved philosophical questions no other man could
The absolute state

every colum has an h an s and a u, the last one is missing the U
then they just pivot a bit more every column, therefore the U is towards the east and notice they also get more or less squashed, therefore [
7

>And you have to manipulate the shapes in your mind to get the right answer.
This is called visuospatial thinking, not working memory. It is at least 1/3 of any legitimate professionally administered IQ test.

I'd love to prove you wrong, but I can't think of any places where a real 105 IQ would hang out on the web. They don't use the internet except for e-mail.

women do not do as well as men on the raven's test lad, sorry

People with stronger visuospatial ability also have stronger working memory. You are literally holding a picture in your mind in the same way you hold a number in your mind.

you know 100 is average right? as in, most people are below 105 IQ

What I see is that each column has a variance of the letters S, H and U, one thin, one "normal portion", and one wide. 3 would be the normal U which is the only missing U to fit into the complete set. That's my thinking at least.

>It is at least 1/3 of any legitimate professionally administered IQ test.
If your iq has anything to do with words, it's not a good iq test. A good iq test should be universal, a japanese man an american and someone outside of civilisation living in the amazon forest should all be able to instinctively know the "logic" making it the real measurement of "g"
Raven test is just that, humans all understand geometrical shapes and logic

Because the typical man is biologically perfect as is the typical female, and smarter. On an IQ test he would demolish any woman's score.

But if the man is autistic, the woman's score will come out superior.

Yes because intelligent people are likely to be good at both. That doesn't mean they're remotely the same thing.
Working memory is how much you can remember. Not how much you can visualize.

E.g. the typical test of working memory is telling you a long string of numbers, having you wait a minute or two and repeat back as many numbers as possible. The waiting is the key. If you had the string of numbers right in front of you then it wouldn't be testing working memory.

I'm sorry but you don't know what you're talking about.

52% of all people are below 105.
48% are above 105.

Literally 1 in 2 people are above or below 105.

i would like for us to have the answer so i can gloat and insult you of being a brainlet when im proven correct.
Anyone knows where we can find the answer?