hellooo everyone how are you doing?
>be me
>online class today
>teacher picks on me bc im not a talkative female
> 90% of the males aren't talking but all females are
tfw you're engineering major and literally STAND out.
hellooo everyone how are you doing?
>be me
>online class today
>teacher picks on me bc im not a talkative female
> 90% of the males aren't talking but all females are
tfw you're engineering major and literally STAND out.
>CS major
>3 five page essays due by May
>5 smaller essays due by May as well
>and a coding project
>and calc work
>and I have to keep up with discussions in the class threads
I'm doing community college next year.
>dont read more than half of my giant ass 700 page history book cuz i already know all the content in the course, pick out the most important information
>instructor assistant criticizes my essay because it is 'not relevant to the history of modern Europe'
>get 84% overall in the class
my major is literally a joke
It's alright. Everything is fucking online for the rest of semester because of corona-chan, including my exams which are now open book, so I don't know if I should understudy because it'll be easy or overstudy because they'll make it really difficult.
It's okay though I'm having fun.
>saving thumbnails
>being a tranny
wow u sound very hard working user! You seem to have big workload... whats the difference between community college and uni? Can you just transfer from uni to community college?
wow are you history major user? I love history and modern europe history
Ehhh sorry I apologise. I'm just a phone poster right now since I only post on Yas Forums when I am in class. I don't bother naming images on my phone...
What's with american colleges and their obsession with essays? I've never had to write a single one for a scientific class.
t. frog
>what period
that class was about modern Europe, from the onset of ww1 to the end of the cold war
>privatization period
do you mean 1990s Russia? it was a part i skipped in the book, but what I do know is that Boris Yeltsin essentially collaborated with other countries in the ussr to further his political agenda. he outmaneuvered the stalinists and Gorbachev after the failed coup; what followed was an attempt at market liberalization, causing a massive depression, new business oligarchs, an attempted overthrow of his rule, and humiliation by chechens
he was one of the most hated people in Russia by the time he left office, but nothing was ever done to him since Putin pardoned everything he did. lots of people said that Gorbachev was the reason the USSR fell, but I think it is more because of decades of economic malaise/larping/authoritarian nonsense and the fact that nobody was really interested in preserving the USSR in a more liberalized state, as the stalinists wanted things to remain the same and the 'liberals' all wanted to disassemble the USSR. its sad because I don't think Gorbachev was all that bad as people think he is
I'm not hardworking; that's all just work that's piled up over the past couple of weeks. Chances are I'm not gonna get to finishing them all anyway.
I'm in a writing class and a political science class, and I have an incomplete class from the first semester that required essays to do.
Oh I see then. Nice trips by the way.
Ooh thats a good topic!! Did you study the balkan war and the break up of Yugoslavia? It's extremely interesting ans make up a big part of europe today.
Boris Yeltsin in my opinion is like a fallen hero. He came to power during a very shitty time so alot of people hated him. Michael Gorbachev was smart man I feel but I think he's one of those people who were too smart and didnt think that people weren't like him and that's why privitisation failed to distribute wealth equally. He was just too mordern for russia. Putin used to be former KGB spy for the kremlin and he wouldn't have rose to power if it weren't for gorbachev's instability. Tbh every russian has done their share of killings boris yeltsin was a paranoid fuck and gorbachev had all the mordern ideas while putin wanted to be feared (take crimea rigging bombing incident for example) kek
How about organizing your time and writing a little everyday?
nah, I made something a bit controversial, my instructor was probably right that I should have made my topic more about history. I talked about how the absence of a nuclear war in the Cold War now makes a future nuclear conflict much more devastating in scale once such a war inevitably happens between two nation states. I think that one is going to happen some day, even if it is outside of my lifetime. I will not bring up the full reasoning I use, but one of the points I brought up was that even if nations like Pakistan/India or DPRK can get them, then what is to say that some backwater country in Africa doesn't obtain them, or someone like Egypt against Israel, the latter of which already has nukes. Balkan war I could have done, but I think the instructor was looking more for something about either WW1, WW2, or the Cold War specifically
These online classes have been a complete joke. If you care about learning they kinda suck, but if all you are after is a degree they make classes so much easier. I have so much more free time now. I'm going to be taking the max amount of credits I can over the summer semester, hoping to graduate a year early.
Cs major btw.
Ehhh that sounds more like a debate than a historical essay. How did you find good evidence to back that up? Personally I don't believe in nuclear war happening in one of the MEDCs but perhaps in LEDCs where there is less order and low political power to fight back. Even so I think majority of nuclear used will be just for testing to show off whose nukes are better kek. Most wars are now very developed and we got $$$ to thank. Money makes countries closer but also makes countries turn to proxies. With the current form of diplomacy, i really see a nuclear war as extremely low.
>good evidence to back it up
the soviets during a 1979 military simulation planned to use 'tactical nukes' to wipe out NATO forces in Germany (7 days to the rhine), and the Americans had a policy of a 'first strike', which is a preemptive nuclear attack to destroy the enemy before they can retaliate. considering the circumstances surrounding these weapons, I don't think that two nations possessing them would not use them in the interest of preventing MAD, in a similar fashion to how Truman decided to nuke Japan to end the war because it allowed America to obtain their strategic objectives much more clearly than through 'operation downfall', or by the other means available to them like a prolonged bombing campaign/naval blockade/liberalized peace treaty
>war as extremely low
for the moment, yes, I think that a nuclear war happening in the next 10, 20 years between two developed countries is very low. however, it has not even been 100 years since they have been discovered, nor has there been a major conflict in the world to answer the question as to whether or not they will be used. it is impossible to predict how the future will play out, nobody could have foreseen the October Revolution in Russia for instance, or saw America assume the position of world policeman in the 1920s. that being said, my views on the future are quite pessimistic. For instance I foresee most of Europe becoming fascist to address environmental issues, a war between Russia/China for Siberian land once China becomes largely uninhabitable for its massive populace, along with 100s of millions dead throughout the equator of the world. if my interpretation of the future is incorrect, which I would think that most people would prefer that, then obviously the question of using nuclear weapons is extraneous in the absence of war. again however, the future can not be predicted, only conceptualized until it happens
big text block, but that's my reasoning as to why I made that topic
>or saw America assume the position of world policeman in the 1920s
I meant nobody in the 1920s could have seen America assume the position they undertook after the conclusion of WW2, I would have deleted that post and remade it but whatever
>graduate with one of the highest grades in my class
>rejected from every Master's degree I applied for this is my fault for only applying for 6 really hard to get into ones
>have to NEET it up for another year while I try to get some papers published
'First strike policy' was mainly because of Truman who encompasses america's military man and nationalism ideals kek. I honestly think that now americans are a bit more smarter than they were in the past. (Also no one did studies to see after effects of nuclear war and the push for the nuclear attack was also bc of research)
I'm kinda lazy to type and I think we scared all the other anons off we our long block text rippp
Hmmm you seem very smart user but why did you only apply to 6 master programmes? You should have applied to 10 ish. Actually in germany masters are quite easy to get in I feel but graduating from bachelors is the hardest sighsss
meh, I don't personally like Truman, but I don't hate him for turning America into what it became. I think most US presidents, in his shoes, would have made the same decision to become interventionist in world affairs
>scared off the other anons from the text block
Unfortunate!
>why did you only apply to 6 master programmes?
Partly because I'm an idiot, but mostly to save on application fees. I opted not to apply for one because of scholarships, and was stupid enough to get talked out of one I probably would have gotten into (and probably on big scholarship) by my parents because of its location.
Next year I'll apply for more because I won't have to pay for my transcript evaluation again.
>half my grade will be decided on work due in next week
>work set 3 months ago
>work I haven't started
I'm not having fun
I'm desperate
>Failing Calc 3, Diff Eq, and Physics 2
>Finals coming up
>Literally haven't learned any of the material
>Pull a full semester withdrawal and switch majors
Why yes, I do solve my problems in productive ways
good luck user, although it might be too late now
You're just a retard lmao, math and physics arent too bad as long as you keep up with the workload
>>Pull a full semester withdrawal and switch majors
the fact that americans can 'withdraw' from exams is so funny to europoors because we don't have that, we either fail or pass a year or switch majors after we've failed the year
I have entered your thread entirely because Rem is cute. I have no intention whatsoever of being on topic.
>gi test in 2 days
>barely studied for it due to 2 research papers and having to write a medical textbook
fuck med school it's a fucking meme
>just finished my last exam ever
>all interviews I had were cancelled because of COVID
>don't qualify for govt covid benefits
>gonna run out of money after May
> Med school
Yeah it's pretty much a living nightmare. I just finished the 2nd year, what about you?