If I had an IQ of 132.5 instead of 142.5 I would be dead right now. Autism forced me to not kill myself
If I had an IQ of 132.5 instead of 142.5 I would be dead right now. Autism forced me to not kill myself
How so?
ORIGINALEEEEENISPENISWEANUS
Too scared of death at my lowest IQ to keep going for it. Too much fear.
El mulatto
I'm smarter than you.
You will die dumber than me.
Literally inferior to me in the most important way and trying to say they're better than me.
Feels good to be on the first page
Or you could do literally anyhing but taking internet shakey test
They overlap extremely well.
I've gotten 142 from like 5 different reputable tests.
OP did your lack of racial purity make you want to suicide?
Dude just drink a whole value size bottle of cough medicine. It has to be the one with dextromethorphan only. The n-methyl d-aspertate receptor agonism will make you feel better for a few weeks after you come back from the other side.
I'm in the 135-145 range according to professional tests (not online bs) and all it does is make me believe everything and everyone is flawed and sucks.
The complete 130-150 IQ range is useless and only makes you unhappy. We are garbage, OP.
There are a few IQ tiers
Anything below 85 is neck yourself territory, you lost the genetic lottery.
85-105 is normal nigger territory.
105-120 is smart nigger territory
120-140 is the point at which you're genetically superior, and you can do almost anything you want to
140+ is literal genius territory.
Lack of people that are my race.
So you can spin it either way. I just know my life is over.
I think you're right.
Life demands 160+ IQ to get anything substantial done.
Let me fix that for you.
>85-115 = neck yourself
>115-130 = You have a chance but you still have to work hard
>130+ = Almost everything will go your way if you apply yourself even a little bit
>140+ = You will never struggle with anything academically
>85-115 IQ
>Bad
No, that is "LoseR" Zone, but you can still have a party killing kids and having sex.
And Martin Bryant was pretty based for having an IQ of 64
True. You can do that if you have other genetic boons going for you like looks or money. But if you don't it's more like this:
>85-100 IQ = Most of the things you attempt to do will end in failure and even much training you will still only be mediocre at best
That will cause any individual without above average conscientiousness to become depressed. Even if you have amazing discipline and work ethic you still likely wouldn't enjoy this kind of life. If you're lucky you peak in high school. If not you just go through life as another bum or shelf-stocker.
>100-115 = You're smart enough to understand that you're not that special but also smart enough to see everything you can never have. You know that your hard work will only give you a meager reward but you also know that the alternative is worse so you keep slaving. This is your average wagecuck office worker.
>115-130 = You can do most work and learn relatively quickly. Unless you've suffered some kind of trauma you're bound to succeed at most things in life, You still have to work some but professions like engineer, doctor or lawyer are all easily attainable for you.
130+ = Unless you also picked up a mental illness along with your intelligence you're headed straight to the top. If you work hard there is almost no limit to what you can accomplish. The saying "The sky is the limit" actually applies to you. Professions such as CEO, Director of government agencies and general are all within your grasp.
140+ = You're either a modern day Diogenes or Genghis Khan.
+ = You will never struggle with anything academically
Not how that works. Certainly not with math. Everyone will hit a wall where learning becomes a struggle, whether you're a literal retard or a genius. The only question is when it happens.
>Everyone will hit a wall where learning becomes a struggle, whether you're a literal retard or a genius.
I don't believe that for a second. Certainly everyone reaches an age where they no longer learn as fast as when they were younger or encounter a subject that they don't intuitively grasp at first but if they are truly intelligent they will still excel at it after a while.
Kasparov has been beaten by younger players many times by now but he's still smarter than 99.999% of chess players in the world. He might not be as sharp as he used to be but he's still better than almost everyone alive. As long as you stay healthy your IQ is for life.
Kasparov is only a 135 IQ.
Which is actually a 122.5 IQ in terms of rarity.
But he's the chess king.
>135 IQ
That still puts him ahead of 99% of the human population.
>actually only 122.5 IQ in terms of rarity
... What?
>he's the chess king
Correction; Used to be. He's still good but nowhere near the best anymore.
I mean, he is the product of a 94 IQ Armenian female and a 110 IQ Jewish snake dad race-mixing. He is only on the 102 IQ bell-curve.
This has nothing to do with genius chess players. I am arguing against the claim that someone will never struggle academically in their life, even if they get 140+ meme points. That only happens if you stop studying before you find the thing that you struggle with, because if you keep studying you will find it one day.
A healthy adult white male that exercises everyday, does intermittent fasting, and takes omega 3 and vitamin D (either naturally or through supplements) and a multivitamin will have an IQ of 112.5
Garry Kasparov is only 135 IQ, Max, despite this.
He is literally just a very strong man that memorized chess
He is literally a gay, crazy man that was so powerful and intelligent and gay that he wins at chess.
>memorized chess
absolute brainlet
I bet you think chess is a solved game too
I'm not joking.
He memorized hundreds of common, difficult positions and let his IQ of 135 and laser-sharp attention carry him through the rest of the game.
That's why he was god-like.
You know what I mean. Sure, maybe you can find some obscure niche area of quantum mechanics or abstract math that you can't quite wrap your head around but in general day to day life you will never struggle to excel in whatever endeavors you devote yourself to. There's no academic job that you couldn't do if you applied yourself.
>Subtracting points because the guy works out and eats his vitamins
Yeah no. IQ is supposed to be measure when you're at your best since it's supposed to reflect your maximum potential. So if anything that just makes his result even more reliable.
>strong man that memorized chess
Chess does require memorizing patterns but it's so much more than that. It requires you to improvise new strategies on the spot, sometimes in split seconds. Those strategies have to be good enough to hold against an opponent that thinks 10-20 steps ahead in every direction as you're playing against them. Memorizing some old tactics isn't even enough to make you a candidate master, much less an international master or grandmaster.
It's supposed to be a measure of the human best, but it's not.
The average human is crazy and doesn't function at their best in an industrial society.
>new strategies
New old strategies.
Kasparov had 99th percentile working memory, a memory database of thousands of games and possible positions, extreme laser focus, and an IQ of 135.
He was absolutely perfect for the game of chess.
I am 142.5 IQ, but I play chess better with an IQ of 122 from being totally sedentary because of my lack of power