Alternate Political Compass

The normal political compass is shit and I wanted to collect data on a bunch of robot's scores.
m1omg.github.io/SapplyValues.github.io/
Answer honestly faggots.

Attached: Sapply Compass.png (802x567, 50.63K)

What a worthlessly redundant addition to the compass. The left is progressive and the right is conservative in the first place.

It is economic retard. If it was a progressive-conservative axis then National Bolshevism would be on the right and Neoliberalism on the left.

Im left 9 units and up 3, liberaltarian marxist-leninist

Attached: JPEG_20200416_140217.png (345x345, 60.77K)

I always have trouble on these tests. While I believe that National Socialism is the only answer to rerouting the world back to its true glory, I believe that a world run by only whites would thrive under the original Jeffersonian democracy of the US, or rather a sort of Roman Republic. Which perspective would you say I should answer from?

Whichever you agree with more and think is most plausible.

>Whichever I agree with more and think is most plausible
What do you mean though? Let me reiterate, my political stance is that we should institute National Socialism until everyone in the world is descended from Proto-Indo-Europeans, but after that we should implement Jeffersonian democracy, because the only way it would thrive is under whites. I hate the idea of Authoritarianism, but I realize this is the only way we can achieve a truly white and good world.

Youre just an incel who just wants to hate people that arent like him

It's better than the original, but I have seen much better versions

Attached: Screenshot_20200417-214423_Ecosia.jpg (1080x861, 186.79K)

That makes you authoritarian, as Lenin would also see authority as a means to an end where once the capitalists are destroyed everyone can have their liberty. I don't think we would have authoritarians if we let them be libertarian once they get their ideal world.

horrible questions but i like the idea

Attached: Screenshot (5441).png (1350x1169, 146.98K)

No actually, I hate them because they are below me. Marxism, and with it nihilism, feminism, and non-whites/gays/etc., has ruined the West and it is on the brink of destruction due to it. The only way to set the Proto-Indo-European peoples back into their rightful glory is through force. America was always a white country until just recently, along with every European country. I wouldn't hate these people if they didn't destroy our country and our peoples, but they do, and so I hate them.
Thanks, that's a good way to put it. I'll answer based on the perspective of authoritarianism then.

The Japanese should be made to write from left-to-right. China and Korea both do and it's done no harm to either of them.

Attached: shodan.png (1850x1600, 295.57K)

I think I am a little more auth than what this says.

Attached: download (1).png (1850x1600, 294.04K)

Here's my results. In reality I would be more authoritarian, but certain pushed it down because of their nature. Specifically, the ones concerning spying on citizens and breaching their privacy/autonomy, and the autonomy of minors. I don't want to be lumped in with the conservacucks, although my economic slide is fairly accurate and my slide on the right should probably be much more conservative.

Attached: test.png (738x633, 113.8K)

I dont get it. What exactly is different with progressive/conservative that isnt encompassed by the other axes?

I'd say that this is way better than the original. The original seems to lean left and also has lazy shit questions like "do you believe in luck?" and "should all gays be killed?"

The authoritarian/liberal axis concerns government intervention in one's life. The left/right axis concerns government intervention in economy, left being more and right being less. The slide on the right measures cultural beliefs.

You need to look at the conditions of those minorities. For example, Blacks in america commit most of the crimes and have and lower average iq compared to the whites, but however dont you think decades of economic abuse and centuries of slavery isnt going to effect them. Its a proven fact that people born into poor family they will most likely be poor aswell, and its also a proven fact that poverty leads to those impoverished people commiting crimes to get by. And dont thing decades of economic abuse isnt going to have an effect on the economic well being of blacks .

Kinda accurate, but I think I'm a bit lower than this

Attached: zoomerheadass.png (646x449, 34.31K)

Origibnololololo

Attached: download.png (1850x1600, 297.99K)

Wouldnt conservative cultural beliefs imply an authoritarian mindset because a conservative would want their culture preserved? And vice versa for a progressive? Im not sure what that meaningfully adds to a political compass other than an easy way for dummies to know whether the test taker was generally liberal or conservative

Why do people need a compass just so they can polarize their ideology? I know what I want and who I don't like politically.

>You need to look at the conditions of those minorities
I do, I lived in the hood for a long time and was born into a fairly poor family. My father was even poorer, and was the youngest of 14 kids. He got us out of the worst parts of the ghetto, and I got myself out of the part I grew up in, why can blacks not do this?
>Its a proven fact that people born into poor family they will most likely be poor aswell
This has nothing to do with whether or not they stay poor due to their lack of ambition, or due to some other facet of say, institutionalized racism (which no longer exists in any way).
>its also a proven fact that poverty leads to those impoverished people commiting crimes to get by.
No, it's not. The Italians came here dirt poor in the early 1900s; their crime mobs were, at their largest, only 5000 members strong. It took very little time for them to assimilate into America, and the crime families subsided within the century. Even when their crime families were at their largest, they still kept their neighborhoods fairly clean and their people safe.
Take the Irish also, who were even poorer than the Italians when immigrating due to the potato famine, and were discriminated against even more heavily than the Italians due to the American populations consisting mostly of Brits; they still assimilated very quickly.

Take note that we can also observe history to point to the fact that, regardless of socio-economic factors now, blacks have never built any self sustaining, strong empires/city-states/etc. above a tribal level, compared to Proto-Indo-European civilizations like Rome, Athens, Sparta, etc.
Even the Gauls, before they warred with the Romans, when they were still in a tribal state, were capable of mounting large scale attacks due to cooperation among the Gaelic tribes, and held a majority of trade routes in Europe before the Romans came in.

stop whining you faggot and take the damn test

Also, don't even get me started on the Jews.

yeah it really sucks dick

Attached: niggerian.png (1850x1600, 294.31K)

What does this mean? I feel I am socially progressive and economically right if that makes sense

Attached: Annotation 2020-04-17 222104.png (1456x982, 101.62K)

It means you are a neoliberal.

originally posting oroi

Attached: ofgesmgsd.png (758x740, 68.89K)

>Socially progressive AND economically right
It means you're a major cuck and deserve the guillotine