In ancient times:
psmag.com
More recently, millennials have less sex than literally boomers:
thesun.co.uk
There was never a golden age of pure wifus 4 everyne user, not unless you were a noble or someone in a position of power to begin with.
Aerith is
Jackson Williams
Jack Ross
>More recently, millennials have less sex than literally boomers:
Male millennials.
Cameron Foster
>8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man
>There was never a golden age of pure wifus 4 everyne user, not unless you were a noble or someone in a position of power to begin with.
Your source does not support your claim.
Blake Sanchez
> Chads fucked every female, betas had none
> golden age of pure wifus for everyone
Yes, being at the top was awesome. And still is
Jaxon Wood
That's prehistory m8, ancient generally means antiquity. Monogamy became a thing with agricultural civilization.
We're going back to a time when a handful of men (not even elites, but literal violent criminals) monopolize 80% of all women.
Xavier Brown
>Once upon a time, 4,000 to 8,000 years after humanity invented agriculture, something very strange happened to human reproduction. Across the globe, for every 17 women who were reproducing, passing on genes that are still around today only one man did the same.
>Another member of the research team, a biological anthropologist, hypothesizes that somehow, only a few men accumulated lots of wealth and power, leaving nothing for others. These men could then pass their wealth on to their sons, perpetuating this pattern of elitist reproductive success. Then, as more thousands of years passed, the numbers of men reproducing, compared to women, rose again. "Maybe more and more people started being successful," Wilson Sayres says. In more recent history, as a global average, about four or five women reproduced for every one man.
>Physically driven natural selection shaped many human traits. Ethnic Africans and Europeans had to evolve to digest milk, for example, while most ethnic Tibetans have adaptations to deal with the lower oxygen levels at high altitudes. But if Wilson Sayres' team's hypothesis is correct, it would be one of the first instances that scientists have found of culture affecting human evolution.
The hypothesis was not confirmed according to this report.
Zachary Anderson
You get my point: if we go by how we reproduce in most of our history, we werent having a fair sexual distribution at almost any point.
Being a guy like us sucked, almost always in history, because females tend to reproduce with Chad.
Justin Wilson
>The team uncovered this dip-and-rise in the male-to-female reproductive ratio by looking at DNA from more than 450 volunteers from seven world regions. Geneticists analyzed two parts of the DNA, Y-chromosome DNA and mitochondrial DNA. These don't make up a large portion of a person's genetics, but they're special because people inherit Y-chromosome DNA exclusively from their male ancestors and mitochondrial DNA exclusively from their female ancestors. By analyzing diversity in these parts, scientists are able to deduce the numbers of female and male ancestors a population has. It's always more female.
This was a statistical estimation based on a pool of subjects.
Carson Ramirez
genealogy.stackexchange.com
Its a common known fact user.
Polygyny is really common in primates, its not something weird at all.
Luke Sanchez
she seems like an angel