All the world's problems could be solved if we killed everyone with a sub 130 IQ

All the world's problems could be solved if we killed everyone with a sub 130 IQ.

Attached: IQ and civilizational advancement.jpg (960x423, 121.96K)

The trick is that IQ is relative. After you slaughter the

Attached: your uber.jpg (640x640, 54.53K)

You are aware those people do important jobs too right?

>implying huts and naked living isn't comfy as fuck

Rip 98% of the world's population. Bit wasteful if you ask me.

left is unironically extremely based. You are a brainlet if you havent taken the kaczynskipill yet.

I'd settle for sub 85 desu

You cannot convince smart people to be farmers or bricklayers or any other important job.
You retards don't understand that you need the lesser people, as well as the smart people, and the mediocrity in between. They all serve the machine and keep it together.

good luck getting a kidney transplant without people who ride motorcycles.

No, we need 130 IQ garbage men because..... uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...................

how is killing people in khoisan going to solve japans problems

You wouldn't last 4 hours living like that. Staring at trees doesn't cut it once you've lived the non-stop dopamine rush that is our modern age of instant gratification and endless entertainment.

I notice you don't compare the Khosians to, say, Nagasaki right after the bomb hit. History and environment mater just as much as IQ. Anything else is just cope from fags who want to pretend that a magical piece of paper makes the master race. News flash - there are morons born into millions who can accomplish more than your high-IQ ass ever will without leaving their fucking rooms. Let's give everyone the same start in life and we'll see if the IQ thing works out in your favor.

Then the survivors have to spend all of their time trying to learn how hunt and gather, and humanity gets set back anywhere from a few centuries to a few thousand years, or just collapses entirely.

Congrats, now you have the people who have the highest likelihood figure out new and exciting ways to fuck up other people fighting among themselves over what's left of the world.

>waa i got bullied by low iq people
>killing low iq people will stop bullying
>killing low iq people will save the world

Killing 90 something percent of the world is not going to solve anything, you fucking ignoramus.

>pic is you

Attached: 699C4927-3E96-4B60-A1E1-06D908F9A28E.jpg (1536x2048, 485.23K)

I want you to read Brave New World. Although purposely setting people up for limited capacity is wrong, you need people to wash dishes for a living. You can't have all elites because then nobody are elites. The thing that keeps the world going is that there are many people at the bottom who aren't very successful and a few successful people on the top.

yes exactly. Civilization has done little but make us addicted to civilization

>kill every with an IQ below 130
>you killed the vast majority of your population
>the people you have left don't want to do manual labor so you're suffering until you make robots to handle that stuff

>kill everyone below 130
>no women left

pretty sure theres statistics that show that good looking people have higher iq's. literally forwardly grown maxila's, facial harmony, large skulls, and facial symmetry is associated with intelligence. stupid people are not only stupid, they are also uglier

no i dont have the statistics on hand and no i dont care to search for them, because im lazy. but im actually right

and op's plan would be more ethical if we just prevented their reproduction. negative eugenics has been used on cows, pigs, dogs, cats and chickens for hundreds of years. but its unethical to do it to humans?

why are people such fucking hypocrites?

OP's secret plan for a homoerotic greek philosopher's utopia

>because im lazy. but im actually right
smart kid in a nutshell

you would also kill more than half of Japan then

And this is exactly why IQ is effectually meaningless: it's mainly an indication of knowledge and experience of certain things learned in schools, and thus cannot be applied meaningfully to people in other cultures like hunter gatherer societies. You're a brainlet, retard.

>indication of knowledge and experience of certain things learned in schools
It's literally the exact opposite.

All the worlds problems can be solved if we killed everyone.

Attached: 1585179889235.png (245x237, 71.16K)

Only if you are a fucking faggot like OP.

>i +18 and i still believe in IQ

Attached: 1585147914383.jpg (1920x1080, 261.59K)

Why people are not measuring morality in units yet?
I want my pretty princess points.

Attached: fedfatter.jpg (554x554, 36.79K)

THIS. Smart people are usually good at math and science and computers or they may be artistic geniuses. But they also might be bad at working on cars or they can't into trade jobs. Or they may not be good sports players.

Or so it purports to be. Who's going to do better on literal any test, a tribesman unfamiliar with the concept of writing or a Westener who's been taking tests every week since they were 8 years old?

It baffles me that racists somehow pretend that both A) these countries are violent and/or primitive shitholes and B) it's possible to get clinically controlled IQ test results from them. I imagine if you grew up with the local militia shooting up your village every week you'd have a hard time concentrating on a meaningless test, too.