>go to the beach
>see 15 year old girls in thongs
When did this happen?
>go to the beach
>see 15 year old girls in thongs
When did this happen?
>When did this happen?
WW2
>When did this happen?
1974 in my country
All hail liberal democracy! What a virtuous, beautiful system. It truly shows the best humanity has to offer.
>When did this happen?
Operation Barbarossa (June 22, 1941)
i am not entirely sure what the problem is here will someone elaborate
They're sexualizing themselves in plain view yet we're discouraged from sexualizing them
>All hail liberal democracy! What a virtuous, beautiful system. It truly shows the best humanity has to offer.
This except unironically.
Thanks to how common this is, nobody has any interest in these girls wearing them.
>hook up with 17 yo girl (legal here)
>talks about bouncing on my dick and me hitting it from the back while I choke her
It was scary because around her mom and family members she's shy and soft spoken.
The shyest people shit the loudest
best kind of girl, but i do agree the duality is quite sudden.
Still, 17 year old girls shouldn't be able to arch their backs like porn stars, or asking men to nut in their mouth.
That's bollocks though, isn't it?
I've had older guys at work tell me with only a weak attempt to hide how hot they find their underage step-daughters or perving on a bosses daughter of barely legal age etc.
Denying it won't make it go away. Men are going to be attracted to girls at a pubescent age. It's just biology. If you want to make that less likely then have kids dress like kids and not emulating their favourite Instagram thot (which is a problem in itself I guess).
Who cares? Are their bodies not theirs to do what the hell they want with them?
We need to move forwards, it doesnt matter how much we desire to go backwards. Not even on the past could robots live happy lives.
You should be discouraged from sexualizing them, you fucking pedophile.
>go to buy weed(legal here)
>place is near a couple schools, including catholic high school where girls where sexy skirts, the other is my old high school
>see 3 teen girls walking my way
>one of them has big tits
>try to sneak a glance at them when we pass
>she gives me a scared look and covers them with her binder
Patently untrue desu
>Are their bodies not theirs to do what the hell they want with them?
Are you advocating for the removal of age of consent here? Can't quite tell what you're getting at.
>I've had older guys at work tell me with only a weak attempt to hide how hot they find their underage step-daughters
How do they say this?
*jerks off on the beach*
its my body not yours
Why do girls like that? Doesn't cum taste gross? It smells gross.
They should dress however they want, they shouldnt be thinking how doing it "wrong" can provoke a pervert at the beach.
Even if they were naked, we need to kill the puritan idea that being provocative is asking to get raped or anything like that, more so if the girl is a fucking kid.
You know what it means. The enemy is not a teen being a retard and dressing with two strings, its the people thinking that it means we should be able to take advantage of her because of that.
I always think that's a strawman. Nobody actually thinks you deserve to get raped because you're naked. But some guys want to not walk around horny all the time because of the way women dress.
If you get a girl horny enough she'll let you do anything to her after she's had her cunt split open.
>its the people thinking that it means we should be able to take advantage of her because of that
...that's what clothes like that are designed to signal to people
>wear clothes scientifically designed to illicit an arousal response in the opposite sex
>DONT LOOK AT HER NAKED ASS CHEEKS THAT ARE ON DISPLAY IN PUBLIC THATS A CHILD IN THAT THONG YOU FUCKING CREEP!
It has nothing to do with fucking puritanism.
You're just being an idealistic moron. If teen girls are dressing and acting like their sexually active and provocative role models then there are going to be problems around the age of consent. Always will be. No way round it.
Doesn't mean the men aren't bad for being ruled by their dick and showing no constraint. If statutory rape is bad though, and you want to reduce instances of statutory rape, then you're gonna need to reduce the sexualisation of underage girls. It's a pretty simple formula.
>But some guys want to not walk around horny all the time because of the way women dress.
this
this
>HURR JUS CONTROL URSELF STUPID BOYZ
Ahem *ephebophile
Okay friend, let me explain something to you since you seem to be new here. Hebephilia is NOT the same thing as pedophilIa. I'm sick and tired of you trolls popping up everywhere and spreading BLATANT misinformation. In many countries hebephilia is considered normal and healthy . Human beings have a natural attraction to girls who are going through puberty. Being attracted to girls who are pre-pubescent is fucking sick and disgusting, but only in the US does there seem to be an unwarranted taboo around a healthy and normal condition. My head hurts. I'm just trying to get my real life back. Fuck
>to take advantage of her
Eww, human contact, I am just taking advantage of my dick
Discord code: QnN4uf
GZrqweoWQvucyK
>Faggotspacing
sorry kiitty
Discord code: ZHFvSc
LjBCZKbLdBoQrN
saved but still not joinnning