I've been on r9k for years now, this is and always will be my home board, and I just gotta ask one thing about you guys on here: Why the fuck are you faggots so goddamn obsessed with talking about women?
Here's the thing, I don't like roastie dykes as much as the next guy on here, but you don't see my dumbass constantly making posts about the subject. I still remember when some actual discussion could be had on here, or maybe just a fun and refreshing larp/collaborative writing thread would popup. I don't know if it's simply simp orbiters or obsessed leddit incels, but threads like those get far less attention now. I mean, we do have other interests right? Why not talk about them? You understand that one of the common stereotypes that the users of this board are known for is the ease in which we are baited, right? I mean, I would've thought by now you faggots could at the very least recognize what is or isn't race bait, but no, you disappoint my dumb ass every fucking time by responding to racebait. You understand there is probably a secret discord group out there, who's sole purpose is to post cuck and racebait content, because it's their collective fetish.
Well, I guess it's true, that old saying about this board: >"r9k doesn't get raided, it raids itself"
>HURR DURR OTHER BOARDS ARE BETTER FOR DISCUSSION Not necessarily, and you don't have the luxury of socializing with people who have the same or similar history of abuse and ostracism as you.
Too many people started coming here from reddit and the like because of screencaps and the like. I'll agree with you that there's way too much talk about women and chads and stacys; femoids; femanons; doomer meme bullshit and hardly any threads of interest ever get bumped with actual conversation. I always love to hear an user talk about their collections of stuff like model planes they pain-stakingly assembled or stories about how their lives are in another part of the world dealing with the same issues that others are elsewhere. Unfortunately, most of the threads are the same recycled topics of racebait and low-effort blackpill bullshit.
Hudson Kelly
I kinda understand that, but goddamn is it frustrating.
Yeah, there aren't really any autism threads about hobbies and interests anymore. You'd think there would given the number of autists on this board, but no, you rarely see that now.
Some of my favourite discussions on Yas Forums have been on this board, but those opportunities are very rare these days
Alexander Jenkins
Me as well. There's plenty of great potential discussion that could be had. At times, you need to derail threads into a better topic to be able to get those discussions.
Tyler Edwards
I remember having a very deep discussion with a brazilian girl in a thread about fetishes. Stuff like that is why I still come back here, cause I think interesting stuff like that can still happen here
In the past, everything in the universe was inanimate. You could think of them as rocks. The world was full of rocks. Eventually, however, RNA caused some rocks to become animate. These rocks could move and they varied in their proclivities to do so. You could divide all the rocks in the world into three groups: rocks that could move and wanted to, rocks that could move but didn't want to and rocks that couldn't move and couldn't want to.
But why would a rock need to be able to move? Because tragedy can strike. Being animate requires a fairly specific order to your composition, which means it takes very little to make you inanimate again. When a volcano erupts and pours lava over the rocks, whether they remain rocks or not is unimportant, but surely they cannot remain animate. For this, it behooves a rock to be able to move, so they can move out of the way of their own destruction.
The inanimate rock doesn't move; the animate rock that doesn't wish to move doesn't move; the animate rock that wishes to move does so, and thus animated rocks become defined as having a proclivity to wish to stay animated. In other words, the reason anything is alive right now is because living things have a desire to keep living.
But living is difficult. You are constantly running from your own mortality. If you were immortal, that might solve everything, but the environment is constantly changing and you can only change so much. For this reason, it's better to be able to clone yourself and teach your clone what it needs to know to live a better life than you. But that's only an environmental solution, not a genetic one. That clone is still you. As some genes become more advantageous and others less, you'll find that simply teaching your clone how to live is not always enough. There is another solution: to shuffle your genes with another person's.
