Actions which do not inflict harm upon the commons or hinder the freedoms of individuals are not crimes

Actions which do not inflict harm upon the commons or hinder the freedoms of individuals are not crimes.

Attached: wvsxhf14ubr41.jpg (2320x3088, 420.91K)

this dick is a crime ayooooooooooooooooooooooo

You don't get to decide what is and isn't a crime, degenerate.

List some examples of what you're talking about.
The only thing I can agree with your point on is recreational drugs. They should all be decriminalized

is that 39daph? lol

fuck you shitlord how about that

Attached: 1585976677639.gif (230x190, 1.52M)

its easter user stop tempting me

Why are you seething so hard? My question was nonconfrontational

I absolutely agree, if it doesnt hurt anyone else let me do what I want government bastards

collecting your own drinking water from rain. afaik this is illegal as fuck in a lot of areas in america

Yes and no, recreational drugs is often used as an example of this, but even now with legally restricted access to them, opiod abuse is putting a disproportionate strain on our healthcare system. A large number of these individuals are un/underinsured for the care that they receive from EMS/Police/Hospitals and that cost then gets transferred onto the taxpayer. Decriminalization of opiates will not decrease their usage, but will inflict further economic hardship on already struggling communities.

in the usa, if you want go stick a shipping container on the ground to live in, you first have to shell out $35,000+ in permits and drawings to be able to dig and pour the required foundation to make it legal

Attached: 1547670350844.jpg (680x541, 35.95K)

>Yes and no, recreational drugs is often used as an example of this, but even now with legally restricted access to them, opiod abuse is putting a disproportionate strain on our healthcare system. A large number of these individuals are un/underinsured for the care that they receive from EMS/Police/Hospitals and that cost then gets transferred onto the taxpayer. Decriminalization of opiates will not decrease their usage, but will inflict further economic hardship on already struggling communities.
the crime here is manufacturing opiods and giving them to people where it isn't fucking necessary in order to extract a profit. ive lived in europe and asia and only america does this.

Attached: 1517942903728.png (526x523, 489.68K)

Ok that's a dumb law. I'm guessing it has to do with cheap dumbasses not cleaning the water properly and killing themselves just because they didn't want to raise their water bill.

>Ok that's a dumb law. I'm guessing it has to do with cheap dumbasses not cleaning the water properly and killing themselves just because they didn't want to raise their water bill.
in america you need to pay for a yearly doctor's visit in order to get contacts or glasses, regardless of whether or not your eyesight changes. selling someone eyeglasses would be a crime

Attached: 1532109539931.jpg (500x334, 22.63K)

who does then user

America is always gonna have these problems because of the way our economy is set up. Basically, we don't have a socialist-lite economy like much of Europe that provides basic services to the poorest individuals for free, therefore trapping them in a loop of financial hardship. However, unlike Asia, our poorest people aren't so poor that they starve and are fed the idea that economic hardship is their fault for being failures, increasing their propensity for opiate abuse. In Asia, you're either so poor that you're struggling to eat and drugs aren't even an option, or your level of poverty is more normalized in your society where there are large populations of relatively stable people living in pseudo shanty-towns, therefore avoiding the dysphoria associated with poverty in the US.

in many parts of america it is illegal to give homeless people food. restaurants aren't allowed to give away leftovers. its illegal to sleep in public, sit on the ground, eat fruit growing on trees...

Attached: 40AE6C19235646BDB548E0F9F35E4A31.jpg (1024x655, 41.11K)

>unlike Asia, our poorest people aren't so poor that they starve and are fed the idea that economic hardship is their fault for being failures,
that's not really what poor parts of asia are like. in cambodia for example there are socialist price controls on domestic sale of essential items like rice, and people are GENERALLY FREE TO GROW THEIR OWN FOOD AND TRADE.

Based
Org
Ig
In
AII
Y

america is a country where freedom is a joke and liberty is a fucking statue

Attached: 3D41E2905D0044D48AC9B7501AE31C97.jpg (780x750, 95.26K)

>prostitution and other activities between consenting adults
>possession and private use of all kinds of things including drugs, weapons, various types of porn, etc.
>marrying your sister, kind of a meme example but no reason for it to be illegal
>Driving a car without a drivers license on your own private property. Same goes for a lot of things that are rightfully illegal in public space but shouldn't be on private property.
The crime is that the public is required to pay for some peoples opiod related problems. That's theft. Especially considering what
mentioned, namely that the opiod epidemic is created by the US medical cartel for the explicit purpose of getting filthy rich off the innocent US tax payer and the broken US health care system.

Real example
Meme example but fairly addressed by poster

groups of qualified people that tend to show rational and effectively decide WHY things should be illegal. unless you're retarded, you can understand why the majority of laws are in place.

I'm basing my experience on rural India and Indonesia where actual death from malnourishment isn't uncommon. But even so, like you said, I think the viability of living on subsistence farming and the standards of being comfortable being lower generally lead to a more satisfied, less drug addicted culture.

It is in the best interest of those who lack intelligence and wisdom be controlled by those who posses both. It is evident by observing human interaction that peace and order can only be maintained through tyranny, thus it is not only morally right that a benevolent force rules over man but it is also in the best interest of those who are ruled over.

>I don't understand this topic so we should should allow daddy and mommy to handle it also i suck fat cock

>I'm basing my experience on rural India and Indonesia where actual death from malnourishment isn't uncommon. But even so, like you said, I think the viability of living on subsistence farming and the standards of being comfortable being lower generally lead to a more satisfied, less drug addicted culture.
what is your experience with these areas? surely you're just retarded. anyway its not relevant at all

Building and working in health clinics to actually treat patients suffering from malnutrition? But yeah, less relevant than your Eat Pray Love backpacking trip. You right

That's fine, but you can rationalize anything as hurting others or limiting their freedoms.