We are not prepared for the shit storm Corona is going to unleash on the world.
JULY WILL HAVE 1 MILLION DEATHS.
USA is currently third in total cases. USA will pass Italy for second place THIS WEEK. Medical supplies are low, hospitals are overrun. Government is incompetent. 3 months of joblessness will leave the public crippled. Crimes will explode, break ins, mugging, stealing everywhere. No one can afford to bury the dead. Dead will pile up.
INDIA will explode in cases. It will be be the new plague. It will burst like an open sore and bleed sickness everywhere. CHINA is going full suppression. All news controlling the virus is fake. Massive propaganda campaign hiding the deaths and rioting.GREECE is on the verge of collapse. UK Entering lockdown, AUSTRALIA rioting and lynching Chinese in the streets. CANADA in lockdown. AFRICA is not prepared at all and will have no foreign aid, they will be demolished. MEXICO is closing their borders.
Healthcare will collapse, The economy will collapse, education will collapse. banks will collapse, transportation will shut down, the government will collapse.
Anyone one of these going down will take the others with it.
you're a schizophrenic niggeroid monkey, i simply don't care if people are dying because of this, this doesn't change my sealed fate. I know there are chinks suppressing shit though, so watch out for that.
>thinking economy is anything but a virtual circus snigger Cool! See you there stealing your bread then
Henry Torres
>cv19 accounts for around 0.2% of global deaths this year The virus itself is such a nothing burger. Just hyped up so the elites can play with their cattle, increase their control and shift power around.
Matthew Young
>USA is currently third in total cases. America is by and far number one at this point slowpoke.
Jaxson Evans
The virus has been around for 4 months, retard.
Owen Bailey
We've had an increase of over 100k infected in just 2-3 days. This is literally just the start. Holy shit you are retarded.
>INDIA will explode in cases. It will be be the new plague >AFRICA is not prepared at all and will have no foreign aid, they will be demolished
Nice, finally
Evan Martinez
indians are gonna be okay, matter of fact, they're currently working on a test kit to start selling to the rest of the world.
Michael Collins
I know it's more comforting to believe that some small elite is planning all of this and is secretly in control but that's just wishful thinking. Just face the reality that this is something going on that's out of anyone's control.
No we havnt, how can you be this bad at understanding numbers? We have had 100k more cases confirmed, that is expected when you do tests at an increasing rate, it doesnt mean anymore people are sick than previously, it just means you tested people and found some people who have it.
>this is literally just the start people have been saying just 2 more weeks every 2 weeks for months and it still hasnt made a fucking blip on the worldwide death rate, sure some areas got hit pretty hard and fast but it's fucking nothing, people die everyday.
Xavier Martinez
>do twice as many tests as yesterday >omg we found twice as many cases today!! this is surprising!!!! American education
Tyler Mitchell
>be american >get coronachan >die $35k in debt
Caleb Carter
>bad at numbers The positive cases per number of tests have also been steadily (exponentially) increasing. Retard. >people die everyday. This isn't even an argument. People die every day, but they do not cause worldwide lockdowns, economic plunges and breakdowns of healthcare systems. This does. You are desperately clinging to denial because you're scared.
You seem rather proud of your inability to understand the exponential function.
Connor Sanders
>instantly accusing him of being American Chink bot detected.
Joshua Kelly
USA is not on number one, it's probably China, they're hiding their numbers again. I mean Wuhan itself has 11million people living and yet they're showing that China MAINLAND only has 81k+ cases.
Chase Murphy
Might I recommend starting your schizotier paranoia post with something crazier? For example, the conspiracy theory that the virus doesn't exist and that it is caused by 5g? You'd get more (you)s.
Jordan Reyes
>The positive cases per number of tests have also been steadily (exponentially) increasing. Retard. Source? does this also subtract the closed cases?
>This isn't even an argument. People die every day, but they do not cause worldwide lockdowns, economic plunges and breakdowns of healthcare systems. This does. You are desperately clinging to denial because you're scared. The panic caused all that, not the virus, you seem completely numb to reality.
Isaac Harris
>USA is currently third in total cases no you're already number 1. america first. >US 104,256 >Italy 86,498 >China 81,394 worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Robert Jones
>3,1 billion people on lockdown >stock indexes plunging >food shortages hitting >infections increasing exponentially Yeah, it's just schizophrenia.
>source upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/41/Lab-specimens-tested.jpg The number of tests have been inconsistent, but the cases have been rising steadily, and the speed of said rise has also been increasing. Also, source your own claims before asking others to do the same. >The panic caused all that Idiots like you underestimated this, which is why we have to resort to drastic containment measures now. Fortunately, idiots who underestimate this no longer have any legitimacy, which is why governments are being more dilligent in their containment efforts. You will be on the wrong side of history. >you seem completely numb to reality. Ironic.
Ethan Jenkins
We're a big country. Sort by per 1 million.
Michael Rivera
This is just a graph for america? yeah, id accept america is going up exponentially right now, I was talking about world cases.
>Also, source your own claims before asking others to do the same. Which claim do you want source on?
>Idiots like you underestimated this, which is why we have to resort to drastic containment measures now. Fortunately, idiots who underestimate this no longer have any legitimacy, which is why governments are being more dilligent in their containment efforts. You will be on the wrong side of history. 20k deaths, less than 0.2% of all deaths (most of which were already dying anyway), not even a blip on worldwide deaths. Yet with all the panic they have essentially shut down the world, decimating businesses, peoples jobs and most importantly their ability to live a life. Essentially taxed people a few months over something that has killed an EXTREMELY insignificant amount of already dying people. Now I know you and I probably dont have the most wild lives so the lockdown doesn't affect us as much but taking a few months away from people when virtually no one has died is a gross misuse of power and clearly political.
Jack Nelson
we arent testing at an increasing rate because the number of test kits is still very limited, but the increase in cases is always greater than that of the previous day. so much for you being good at numbers
Hudson Wilson
Im talking worldwide you fucking mong, not everyone revolves around your dumbass country. Give me the fucking worldwide data for number of tests done per day and positive results per day.
Brandon Evans
>Give me the fucking worldwide data for number of tests done per day so you dont know how many tests are done per day despite claiming that "they're increasing durr"?
John Green
>stock indexes plunging I wish this was true because I wanted to buy cheap stocks. Alas, it is not. Market is already pushing back upwards and never even made it very far down. >food shortages hitting There are literally no food shortages. Retards bought more food than they needed, and some still are, but the amount of food being produced and shipped and put on shelves has not changed.
Caleb Morales
>why aren't you freaking out Not freaking out for me, but for my father i for one don't care if i get corona and die
Brody Richardson
A graph for worldwide tests per day would be nice, as that information doesn't seem to be available, despite you using it as the basis of your argument. Testing is most likely increasing, but you don't know if it's increasing at the same rate as the positive tests. America has been doing less testing and getting more positive cases, for example. Germany, for example, has been conducting some 200,000 thousand tests (Robert Koch institute estimate, they aren't saying how much tests exactly are done) per week for a while now, but their new daily cases continue to increase. worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/germany/
Isaac Rivera
who wants to join my gang of raiders/bandits when shit really hits the fan?
you must have a signature weapon. i will use a katana.
It is as bad as you say, but will not lead to any large permanent change. If anything, governments will become more fiscally liberal (people need savings to weather a crisis after all) and more socially conservative and protectionist when it comes to immigration and trade (disease protection, disgust, and xenophobia all scratch the same itch.). The stock market will eventually rebound, though who knows how long that will take, so it's a good idea to invest now while the prices are low, if you have the money to do so.
Justin Collins
They unironically deserve this. 200 years and they still have a worse healthcare system than Cuba
When did I say I did? I think you will find it's extremely hard to find the data and I would wager intentionally so to help drive the panic. Go ahead, have a look for the data, please, it is relevant to you making a wild claim. I was asking you for these numbers since you were making a claim "they are increasing exponentially". I said there is no proof of that, and the numbers would increase solely on doing more tests alone which is a fact, if you want to prove they are increasing at a dangerous rate then you need more evidence than what you have provided.
Can you back up a single wild claim of yours with some actual data rather than just "hurr big number get bigger"?
>Yeah, it's just schizophrenia. Yes, those over reactions caused by people thinking just like you are pretty much the definition of schizo. It is way out of proportion to the facts (0.2% of daily deaths). How many times do I have to repeat this to get it into your mind? The vast majority of those deaths were dying people anyway, that 20k 'borrowed' most of that number from other causes of death or just cut people short by a few months, it is not a grave loss of life. It's probably more like losing 1000 healthy lives or 0.01% of the population.
Samuel Nguyen
It's pushing up because everyone can see that this is in fact fucking nothing and investors know the isolation will be ending soon.
Evan Green
What the fuck do you mean my claim? what claim did I make, I said that you dont have enough data to make your assertion that it is truly worth caring about. How is that making a claim? that is the truth, I have asked you for the data needed to back up your claim and you cant provide it, fucking schizo.
Jordan Smith
Stocks dont work like that, they work on confidence in the future. It's expected though, a recession was long overdue regardless, the panic was enough to set it off but it would have happened sooner or later anyway.
Owen Reyes
I have provided data as to the cases increasing exponentially. You have provided arbitrary conjecture about things you have no information about (the number of tests per day). If you want to argue that your ignorance is as valid as CDC and WHO data then I'm not going to argue with you. >more evidence Okay, I can screencap a graph from worldometers since you seem to require a visual aid. >"hurr big number get bigger" You also seem proud of your inability to understand the exponential function.
And... because of the trillion dollar stimulus packs.
I am claiming that the cases are growing exponentially and that this is only the start. Your counter argument was that this is due to an increase in testing, without providing a source for the number of tests. I have provided examples of two countries that do not adhere to your claim, ones that have seen an exponential increase in cases despite a steady/inconsistent number of tests. You are arguing from a deficit of information, and arguing that your lack of knowledge is more valid than any source I provide (i.e. the CDC and WHO).
The bubble had to burst, but this virus is an insane drain on worldwide resources.
>And... because of the trillion dollar stimulus packs. No, because of confidence in the economy resuming. Stimulus aids the economy, it does not itself directly cause investors to go "time to buy stocks".
Justin Martinez
>(0.2% of daily deaths). this is such a meaningless claim. its like saying that there's more atoms in the universe than people infected with covid, so we should just ignore it.
Benjamin Anderson
It's funny how "just a flu bro" retards are still a thing.
Kevin Phillips
>I have provided data as to the cases increasing exponentially I never questioned 'cases' increasing exponentially, I questioned 'infected' increasing exponentially. Why are you trying to use these awful semantic tricks to push your narrative? I asked for the data required to prove your point that this should be worth worrying about. It is not worth worrying about unless worldwide INFECTIONS is increasing exponentially but even then we have months before it is a nothing burger since it's still below 0.2% of deaths.
>You also seem proud of your inability to understand the exponential function. Fuck man, you're still going on about 'positive cases in one (or two) countries', stop moving the goalposts.
You're a fucking schizo, over reacting to a nothing burger because the MSM manipulated you to. It's funny how everyone says they dont trust the MSM then still panic when they tell them to.
Gavin Cruz
You should probably hold onto that until it actually becomes something worse than "just a flu", because right now it really is just a flu.
Jacob Watson
What would make that claim meaningful? Maybe if we compared it to other viruses? (i dont have the number in my head but it's atleast an order of magnitude higher). What if we compared it to the % of people who will die due to the economic slowdown of the world? that's going to be far higher than 0.2%
Again, even that % is much higher than it deserves credit for, most were dying anyway. The only alternative to using facts like this is emotion like you are.
I know what you will say >but this is just the start Yeah to some degree but no one knows how high it will go, we simply dont have the data needed. What is sure though is that shutting down 3/4 of society like we have done is going to ruin lives.
Robert Nguyen
Those leafblowers look fucking awesome
Levi Peterson
>It is not worth worrying about unless worldwide INFECTIONS is increasing exponentially But they are. Another visual aid has been provided for your mentally handicapped self. The active cases are increasing on an exponent, as the number of infections has been increasing. This is from worldometers, which uses WHO data. I would say that the WHO is more reputable than you. >0.2% of deaths. This doesn't mean anything. The question is how many of the infected die (you cannot accurately calculate the case fatality rate during an ongoing epidemic, but it's seeming to be about 5-10%, according to The Lancet.) thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30195-X/fulltext >MSM manipulated you to. The MSM have been pushing the opposite narrative for months. They only started taking it seriously in recent weeks. You've been manipulated by the MSM but you haven't really strayed from what they were initially pushing on you. >stop moving the goalposts. You have yet to provide anything other than conjecture. I have cited the CDC, WHO and The Lancet. You have provided zero data, even when directly implored to do so. When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser, which is why all you've left is adamantly insisting that I am insane because you are objectively wrong.
>facts you are literally just pulling shit out of your ass while the other user is citing medical journals and the cdc though. you sound like you didnt prepare for this so youre holding on to wishful thinking
John Wright
When did I say "just a flu"? I admit it's slightly worse than the average virus going around but the reaction is WAY out of proportion.
Why would it be funny "just a flu" people are still around though? 99% of the world hasnt been affected, there are only a handful of hospitals/cities worldwide that have been meaningfully impacted.
Eli Perez
I work at a hospital. We quit testing last week because all tests began to be confirmed. I called in sick and self quarantined even though I do not have it as far as I know. It's going to get worse. They are expecting it to get worse. Stay home. Get what you need to survive now.
Chase Myers
> only a handful of hospitals/cities worldwide that have been meaningfully impacted. And 2 months ago it was only in China. That was when just-a-flu-tardism was acceptable. 2 weeks ago it was at 150000 cases (well over 600000 now). We will hit a million within a week, and it isn't going to get much better from there for a while since the peak is set to be in weeks. Things are set to get worse, and still claiming that everything is ok is grounds for a darwin award at this point.
Eli Moore
You are confusing 'infections' with cases again. If after all my explanation you still cant understand the difference then you are literally too dumb to argue with.
>This doesn't mean anything. The question is how many of the infected die (you cannot accurately calculate the case fatality rate during an ongoing epidemic, but it's seeming to be about 5-10%, according to The Lancet.) You cant know the rate until you know how many are infected. Any number is meaningless without that which you cant provide. Most infected people will never become a 'case' (as they have little to no symptoms) which will artificially inflate the mortality rate. If you still cant understand this and want to play your semantics game then you are either legitimately retarded or a paid shill so bye.
>The MSM have been pushing the opposite narrative for months. They only started taking it seriously in recent weeks. You've been manipulated by the MSM but you haven't really strayed from what they were initially pushing on you. They werent pushing the opposite, they simply werent talking about it, no one was because we had virtually no cases in the west.
> I have cited the CDC, WHO and The Lancet. What do you mean you have cited them? when did you cite them for your claim that it's essentially the end of the world? you only cited them for 'the number of cases' which I never even disputed.
>medical journals and the cdc They are all using the same method he is, looking at confirmed cases not overall infections. It doesn't matter if he can find 100 people pushing the same number as he is. I am not questioning that number, im pointing out that the number doesnt mean what he thinks it does. It is the mortality rate when you are a confirmed case of cv19, it's not the mortality rate of having cv19.
Carson Clark
>hurr durr im more reputable than the cdc
Julian Gray
"Just a flu" is kind of inaccurate. SARS-CoV-2, with no vaccination routine and a brand new population with no immune resistance to it, manages to be a bit worse than Influenza when Influenza is facing vaccines, conditioned immune systems, and a stabilized number of infected.
By comparison when Influenza was facing an unvaccinated, unconditioned population (as it did in 1918 when it hit on a mutation that made it unfamiliar to people's immune systems) it had a massive 20% fatality rate and killed a hundred million people.
Influenza is far, far deadlier and more potent than SARS-CoV-2. We just have medication, a population with acclimatized immune systems, and a generally consistent annual number of infected every year to mitigate the flu. This shit is nowhere near the flu's level.
