148 IQ

the 148 is a result from company iq tests, not some online test

Most women are too fucking dumb and when i meet some smart ones they are either taken or not interested, since physically i am not very attractive. And i do have a job.

See this is the arguing power of brainlet retards, namecalling, assuming characteristics, anecdotal evidence, insulting the nature of the person or the way the argument is presented, literally every fucking wrong argument, and you niggers pretend you are posting it as ironic fun but this is genuinely how you think, these kind of responses are the genuine responses of your brain to any issue you encounter

Attached: argument pyramid.png (707x530, 103K)

Very based high IQ user

Attached: 1584346324424.gif (194x172, 494.96K)

170 here
You're both wrong. Life will never be good no matter how hard you try.

Ask me literally anything that doesn't require knowledge (as that is not a matter of intelligence and i very likely won't have it)

>99% of people don't understand my brain power
>these niggers assume of me
maybe the company tallied the test incorrectly

Prove 2 + 2 equals 4

What do you believe is behind a black hole? Show me your train of thought.

This one is very simple, of you can't solve within 2 minutes you're a brainlet.

If two typists can type two pages in two minutes, how many typists will it take to type 18 pages in six minutes?

>criticizes others for name calling during arguments
>calls them "brainlet retards"

Addition is technically something you need knowledge for. op said knowledge has nothing to do with intelligence (because he's a pleb).

If i post this on any other board (except maybe /adv/ and Yas Forums) it would get deleted

Tbh i think me and plebians both have benefits. I can appreciate their good sides, like they are good at socialization, their intuitive-based life approach makes them solve most of their issues by pure instinct and they are generally useful to society due to their nature.
But i am not going to lie, i don't need to lie. I honestly believe i am better than them. Intelligence is what makes humans human, it is the sole and only thing that makes us not be shit-flinging chimpanzees and i'm tired of pretending shit like "love is the answer" is anything else but plebian-calming tool.
Smart people are better than dumb people. You are welcome to argue otherwise, but i am sure you will just go "haha dumb fedora look at how arrogant he is"

Why didn't you use your super high IQ to write something that sets up a more inviting discussion? Your narcissism is hindering the discussion you so badly desire.

...surely you're smart enough to exercise some introspection and identify this, right?

you don't really have an argument yourself, it is actually just an opinion that you 'feel' is true. would you accept this from a pleb or scoff at the idiocy of it?

Go ahead, live a life without love. Can guarantee you'll be a shell of a human regardless of your pseudo-science number score.

>the sole and only thing
Lol

Emotional relief

If you are talking purely about numbers (those abstract unreal concepts of amount) then it's true

There is no 'behind a black hole'. And i have no idea, our brains are just not made to understand that stuff. I'm imagining a point in space that just sucks everything in, but i am aware that when it comes to actual physics that's basically 3rd grader imagination.

haha dumb fedora look at how arrogant he is The reason you think intelligence is so important is because it pleases your gigantic ego. It's a strictly emotional decision that you're rationalizing after the fact. I know this because I thought the same things and made the exact same arguments when I was younger. Your life will be better if you stop being an insufferable cunt.

So you need emotional relief in place of logical arguments? I thought you were criticizing average people for being emotional monkeys instead of thinking logically?

Making people angry is the best set-up for a discussion. Generally, this is called "bait"

My argument is very simple but to elaborate: Our brains based on hierarchy define several dimensions of our mind, the most common differentiation being between "emotions/feelings" and "ratio/logic". I am going to accept this as working differentiation of the mind even though it's faulty at times, purely because it's widely accepted and to illustrate my point.

We share almost every emotion with our animal friends especially mammals. Chimps can also feel affection, either romantic or platonic, chimps also recognize beauty, chimps also enjoy music, chimps are also acting based on instinct. Instinct is a great thing that drives most of the shit you do in your everyday life, guided by pleasant feelings we get for abiding it and negative feelings for ignoring it.
We also share our ratio, our intellect with every animal, but on a very different scale. Our ability to comprehend our surrounding, properly visualize it, make logical connections, think ahead, voice our thoughts into language, that is not the result of some instinct that tells us to do this shit naturally/biologically, it is something we have to learn to master over time, something that is under the direct control and what composes what we call 'consciousness'.
Now my point is that it is not our instincts that made us rise above all animal, it is our ratio. We didn't learn to beat lions because we would be more positive or filled with love, not because of anything our instinct told us to do, but because of the complete opposite: Because of going AGAINST our instinct and doing something that might've felt weird, but was rationally better, like not punching it, but using a sharp stick instead. And throughout time, it was always intellect not instinct that improved humanity and made it what it is today.
Just by looking at history, there is no reason to not believe that more intellect is better

Intelligence is not what makes humans human. Humans are called homo-sapiens. Sapien meaning "wise". Wisdom is integral to humanity. There are exceedingly cruel and intelligent individuals who have existed throughout history. Don't get the wrong idea though, such people were never powerful.

Prove me it's not then. I don't deny i am not arrogant, same as a Yas Forumslad would be arrogant about being more ripped than some skelly, but that doesn't make being ripped wrong (i suppose you can visualize it at this example better since it's not insulting your small brain). Make some other argument besides "youre wrong cunt"

We all need emotional relief, dummy. The difference is i don't use it as the basis of my argument, mainly just to spark shit up.

Holy fuck you are the epitome is stupidity. But sure, keep telling yourself you are "wise" (i made as much logical arguments as you)

>I honestly believe i am better than them.
And yet you're here, complaining, while they are out there, enjoying their lives.

>i'm tired of pretending shit like "love is the answer" is anything else but plebian-calming tool.
How old are you? I am willing to bet that by the time you're in your late 20s living a loveless life will get unbearable.

Making people angry is the best set-up for quarreling. For someone who values logic, why would you rouse emotion if what you wanted was an intelligent discussion free of bias?

I'm not going to spend my time educating drooling simps on the internet. Keep clutching your poorly written, sloppy "logical" arguments though. I'm sure it'll get you far.

So if we all need emotional relief, don't criticize others for acting on this need. Also if your goal is to bait, you didn't have an argument in the first place.

Logic is the "how" emotions are the "why". You need emotions to make people engaged in the conversation in the first place. If i worded the OP in a more self-deprivating, mild or objective way, i would get maybe 2 responses and the thread would die. Its just marketing.

Logic can be a "why", it can be a "how", it can be a "what", it can even be a "where" and a "what". Its a generalization of cause and effect, or the best solution to whichever question it pertains.

>And yet you're here, complaining, while they are out there, enjoying their lives.
First of all, i doubt that right now, they are out there
Second of all, this is about priorities. I will rather spend my day complaining about arbitrary social issues online, they will rather spend their day driving around in a car. I am generally less happy because i act less on instinct, which i don't see as a bad issue. I don't see "happiness" as a measure of success in life for that reason.

And i am not saying i want to live a loveless life stop fucking assuming things. I now emotions are important for mental well-being. Intellect is just more important since it goes beyond your mental well-being.

A smart man isn't always a wise one. A smart man shouts at fools, a wise one lets the fool walk their own paths for he knows he can't fix anyone. In other words, shut the fuck up.

Attached: So....jpg (250x206, 5.76K)

IQ
% of the people around me don't understand my brain processes, cannot share the same interests, have very limited world-view and are just emotional apes

How is this surprising? Have you just realized hierarchy exists? Most people do not make choices based on pure logic, but instead use their emotions and societal norms as a starting point. It's been this way since the beginning of time, and in a sense this can be a good thing.

IQ isn't everything, although it's a prerequisite for success. An intelligent AND ambitious man would accept the fact that most people think differently than smart people/the elite and analyze and understand the way average people think. Then one could study the way to manipulate people to use them to shape the world into your vision of it (or rather the way the world ought to be, from less of a relativist stance). If you're not actively doing this already I don't know what to say, that is how powerful people operate. Otherwise you're just crying on the Internet about obvious realities.

God you people are making me angry just be being so dumb. I will just repost this picture to whoever argues anything beside the main point from now on because you are all just at the bottom of the pyramid and its annoying how now i somehow have the responsibility to respond logically to your dumbfuck nitpicking posts

responding to tone, ad hominem, name-calling

The difference is i don't use it as the basis of my argument, mainly just to spark shit up.

What's the main point lol

One key point of effective counterargument is calling out your opponents fallacies. You can refer to your pyramid all you want, no one here is name calling or using ad hominem, nor is anyone with something worth saying responding to tone or contradicting without support. We're highlighting the flaws in your logic and are explaining why your wrong with better logic and reason.

>First of all, i doubt that right now, they are out there
What, you doubt people out there exist? Or is this your superior IQ making you think literally, and thus thinking that quarantines existing in some places are somehow a counter-argument?

>And i am not saying i want to live a loveless life stop fucking assuming things.
That's exactly what you're saying, only you're too stuck up to see it.
>I will rather spend my day complaining about arbitrary social issues online
>I am generally less happy because i act less on instinct, which i don't see as a bad issue.
There. If you didn't want to be like this, you would have changed, but you don't. Hence you want this, only you lack the mental faculty to reason about it all the way to the end.

As an aside, if you think it's all OK that you are like this and love is just a calming tool, I don't even know why you've made a raging, all-caps paragraph, and I don't think you do either. You're just as emotional as the people you're criticizing, going
>ITS DRIVING ME INSANEEEEEEEEEE
in one post and then
>I will rather spend my day complaining about arbitrary social issues online
in another.

You are right, my bad.

>he knows he can't fix anyone
that is just not true, might've been true in ancient greece but nowadays we have these things called media and education that can influence a shitload of people

Originally it was but it seems to have digressed into argument over if smarter people are better and with some special cases, if i am a smart person, so depends where you want to join it.

There are lot more argumentation fallacies than name calling and ad hominem, i will try to point them out from now on.

Take the ignorance pill pop xanax and drink until your atleast 110 it will make your life 100 times better.

while I understand your underpinning of the importance of intelligence in human success I do think your characterization of language, human instinct and the broad impacts of intelligence on the character of humanity is incorrect.
there is nothing instinctual about boarding a train or browsing a book stand. there is nothing instinctual about writing technical manuals or paying tax. the vast majority of the human experience takes place removed from any of our instinctual pangs save perhaps eating and fucking.
language isn't just a function of intelligence but, ironically actual instinctual. we learn it naturally from our social environment and while it develops with use and cultivation this isn't necessarily a function of intelligence. are smarter people better artists? probably/plausibly but it's important to remember those brain conditions where you can be a literal window licking retard but have high level language function. language and intelligence are separate functions with language imo a better divider between non-human primates than intelligence.
your lion argument I'd say is also wrong. humans have an instinct to not get killed by a predator and to stop their kin from getting killed by a lion. look at geese and weasels standing up to cows and wolves. did they reason that they have no chance but should try anyway? blessed ratio shine thy light on this poor fowl and lift him up to reason his way into interspecial competition. I imagine they fight for the same reason humans do: survival. Now a goose has presumably never actually killed a cow just made them run away but if they had tool usage perhaps they could have. also while not overly relevant humans are decended from primates that would grab things and hurl them at each other so perhaps punching lions wouldn't even be the instinct that was overcame but sharp sticks were merely a happy accident when there was a limited amount of things to hurl.

Okay, no one has used these fallacies though, at least from what I've seen. You're basically doing what you criticized in the beginning, we're going back and forth based on emotion. The most logical thing is to stop because this little nonsensical side argument is going nowhere. Carry on.

IQ

*opens Yas Forums*

... stfu

What is your discord OP? I can relate to you because I actually do math for fun and my IQ is 147.

It was a joke damnit, stop being so triggered.

I value intelligence above feeling happy. There is no desire to be emotionless or any regret for being this way, i just think being smart is worth feeling shit. I am trying my best to prevent this, i have social life and relationships, they are just not primary for me. I am not sure what you are trying to say.

If you wonder about the wording of my post

Already on heavy weed/alcohol/tobacco abuse i don't need to mix anything more in there. It's depressing that stupidity in the world is so strong we need to suffocate ourselves with drugs to survive in it.

The answer is three.

1. You just used a discredit fallacy despite labelling anyone who is not at the top of your argument pyramid as a retard
2.you tagged the wrong post
3. You're backtracking

Wrong, retard. If 2 typists type 2 pages in 2 minutes, it means 1 typist types 1 page in 2 minutes. If 1 typist types 1 page in 2 minutes, 1 typist types 3 pages in 6 minutes. 3x6=18, so 6 typists type 18 pages in 6 minutes. Fucking hell, man

>
I value intelligence above feeling happy. There is no desire to be emotionless or any regret for being this way, i just think being smart is worth feeling shit. I am trying my best to prevent this, i have social life and relationships, they are just not primary for me. I am not sure what you are trying to say.
What I'm trying to say is if you're fine with all of this, and you have a social life with relationships, then there's literally no point in your idiotic thread. You made a whiny OP in which you went all-caps about something that apparently:
1. doesn't bother you
2. isn't an actual issue
And you lack the self-awareness to realize that you're emotionally lashing out while criticizing people for emotions influencing their behavior.

the low iq high verbal function disorder is william's syndrome. not that anyone cares but just for specificity's sake

>but it leads in people electing based on anecdotal rhetorics instead of actual competence or logical approach

And you really think there was a time when a majority of people actually made their decisions based on actual competence and logical approaches?
Most people (I'm no exception) patch up their worldview from anecdotes and are heavily influenced by their upbringing. "Free thinkers" are a very rare exception