If a girl has a good father, why shouldn't she be sexually intimate with him? Girls can want to do things like kissing, touching, sex, or just learning about those things, in the absence of an attraction to any particular boy, so why shouldn't they do those things with a man that they already trust and feel safe with? By excluding this possibility, you are encouraging girls to subject themselves to unnecessary risk.
If a girl has a good father, why shouldn't she be sexually intimate with him? Girls can want to do things like kissing...
Other urls found in this thread:
I agree with you OP. It's also the only non-cucked option.
Have you considered that perhaps not every father wants to fuck their daughter? I can say with some certainty my dad doesn't.
op do you have the other image of this set?
you know which one i mean
You're problem is you arent arguing against logic here, you're arguing against innate felling of disgust that come from the genetic dangers of inbreeding. You can't beat the innate emotions that a majority of people have with logic, it just doesn't work.
is this a question or an argument ?
why don't you start by asking yourself maybe why they shouldn't before I even bother to entertain an answer to what just looks like bait
>I can say with some certainty
I have bad news for you femanon.
Hmm.
Because she can get a little too attached for you, therefore being unable to form a romantic relationship with any other man outside of you and having a higher risk of having an inbred child as condoms are never 100% effective, or so.
Very interesting thread, though.
He definitely doesn't he's not some kind of pervert like you guys
>Because she can get a little too attached for you, therefore being unable to form a romantic relationship with any other man
That's not how addiction/dependence/whatever works. People are initially driven into addiction by outside circumstances. It's not caused by the substance.
Why don't you try laying on his bed in sexy lingerie with a condom tucked into the waistband of your panties on father's day as a "prank" and see what his reaction is.
He would just kick me out or take me to a therapist I think.
Are you not the guy that confessed to sleeping with his teenage daughter yesterday?
No, but now I want to know that story.
The reason why, OP, is because children don't initiate fucking sex with their parents
>"yeah cletus, I'll be down there in just a sec, I gotta finishing writing this thread on Yas Forums. Tell pa to lube right this time"
>Have you considered that perhaps not every father wants to fuck their daughter?
the vast majority do. no dad will be happy about their daughter getting a bf
if the genders were reversed people would sperg out
>tfw no hot teasing mom who offered to take your virginity at age 12
>tfw you will never hear her say "Sorry user sweetie, but you're going to have to wear a condom, since you're a *man* now and mommy doesn't want you getting her pregnant."
>tfw she will never see your dick twitch in response to that and say "Oh my, I guess I won't have to worry about my boy not giving me any grandchildren in the future."
you degenerate piece of shit need to be thrown off a bridge
cunnyposters are truly based and sickening at the same time.
kek just think about it logically
This is why white people will always be subject to hillbilly and inbred jokes.
Non-whites are just jealous because they don't have dads.
Muslims and pajeets have much lower single mom or divorce rates than whites. Fucking your daughter is seen as backwards even by them.
There was this guy, single father, don't know if it was on here or on Yas Forums, that explained how his daughter, when given "the talk" at around 15 yrs old, wanted to try it with her dad, and they kept going
But Muslims and pajeets are rampant with inbreeding. Probably a monthly let's fuck our daughters! day
>There was this guy, single father, don't know if it was on here or on Yas Forums, that explained how his daughter, when given "the talk" at around 15 yrs old, wanted to try it with her dad, and they kept going
If he posted it on 4chink then it must be true then.
Fucking immediate relatives is unnatural and something normal humans are instinctually repulsed by.
Fucking pedo, eat a bullet
But with them, it's not consensual, so it's different.
>"the talk" at around 15 yrs old
That is the most unlikely part of that description.
incest is fucking disgusting and ALWAYS abuse.
(loli/pedo is cool tho long as they arent related)
The normal girl is usually extremely anxious to please her father. She feels in him the forerunner of the desired elusive male.
Among Sicilians sexual relations between a father and his daughter are accepted as a matter of course, and the girl who participates in such relationship is not looked upon with disapproval by the society of
which she is part. I'm a great admirer of Sicilians, fine athletes, fine musicians, fine upright people, and great lovers.
"It's disgusting" isn't an argument.
When 99% of the pop thinks so it is.
Go ahead, try to be "reasonable" about pedo shit in public, see what happens.
"its abuse" is
look how easily the majority of normies changed their tune from 'homoseuality is disgusting' to 'homophobia is dsigusting'. it has nothing to dow tih any innate feeling or moral beleif, its just a social response and as soon as its legalised the 'pedo panic' reaction will disappear most places.
Appeal to popularity isn't an argument.
Well, if you want to manufacture girls with severe borderline personality disorder that's an excellent way to do it. You don't get to complain about them if so though
>look how easily the majority of normies changed their tune from 'homoseuality is disgusting' to 'homophobia is dsigusting'.
The disgust for homos came from religion. Homos were able to exist freely in many cultures before abrahamic religions came into effect.
Pedo shit is 100% different, it goes against the very moral core of 99% of people, it's a crime against nature itself.
Now I will say, what should be considered pedo can and should be debated. The 18 age limit we place is pretty arbitrary, and I certainly dont think that fucking a 17 year old should be considered pedo.
But dont be mistaken, anything before puberty is 100% pedo and if you engage in that behavior you deserve a bullet.
I think your dad would fuck you given no repercussions. Any retaliation to you advancing would be done out of protection for you or him. Like if he'd kick you out, or take you to a therapist, it'd be because it's not normal behavior and signifies something deeper, rather than him not wanting to fuck you.
People don't end up with personality disorders from doing safe activities that they themselves wanted.
how cucked and brainwashed do you have to be to unironically think homofaggotry is more natural and moral than wholesomely screwing perfect lil preteens
Nigger look at the Greeks, look at the Romans, look at THE CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC MIDDLE EAST.
You just btfo yourself with your own argument.
>There was this guy, single gay father, don't know if it was on here or on Yas Forums, that explained how his son, when given "the talk" at around 15 yrs old, wanted to try it with his dad, and they kept going
>lol, you must be brainwashed for thinking that sex between two grown consenting adults is fine but a man abusing a pre pubescent child isnt.
This is your brain of pedo shit
>lmao my guy, barbarians would occasionally abuse children, so I should be able to aswell
Ok so when are we sacrificing you to Odin for good crops? I mean people used to do it, so I should be able to now right?
My sexual infatuation with children is a reaction the social isolation I experienced as a child as the result of an early sexual awakening. I will not consider this a just society until the factors in the world that lead to my neglect are remedied.
Exactly, which is why having a trusted caretaker delude themselves into thinking that them using your body for pleasure benefits you both in some way definitely gives you a personality disorder.
Total bait post in a bait thread. I think you need yo calm down.
Is this a direct quote from fucking Lolita?
Your argument was that it goes against the core of human morality and couldn't be culturally acceptable.
To counter, you disingenuously claim that the Greeks and Romans, the height of civilization, don't count because they were "barbarians".
Nice argument. Stay btfo.
When did I say they were the height of civilization?
In fact when did I even mention them. What are you smoking
Direct quote
>lmao my guy, barbarians would occasionally abuse children, so I should be able to as well
In response to the argument that pedo shit was culturally accepted by them.
Stay btfo fren.
If your daughter wants to try sex, are you suppose to just go out and find some similar aged boy for her to fuck then?
be a good dad and get her a dog. at least the dog won't start shitty pedo threads if it wants to fuck her
>be a good dad and get her a dog
What if she isn't white?
Dogpill confirmed
So where in that do I mention Rome of greece?
Don't do that
youtube.com
By replying to the statement that Romans and Greeks culturally accepted pedo shit with, and I quote:
>lmao my guy, barbarians would occasionally abuse children, so I should be able to as well
>White people are the inbreeders