Lifting for thots

>lifting for thots
>not lifting for twinks
Explain yourself, /fit

Attached: 1585535436040.jpg (960x738, 70.63K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YrXjmHdA1tg
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I'm not a faggot like you OP.

>twinks
Absolute faggot
>tomboys
The only correct answer

I lift for futas.

Marriage is necessary to being successful. Look, even if you're two burger flippers, being able to live together, share grocery/rent expenses basically doubles your income overnight
Key to a long-term relationship is the platonic idea of a transcendent third. When you worship merely your mate, that love will fade overtime but if you worship a transcend third, like our lord and saviour Jesus Christ, and he gave us the responsibility to be fruitful and multiply, and that means having kids.
That only works if your partner can legitimately have kids, because your twink, won't.

Unlike OP, i'm not a faggot.

Blessed post

Attached: 1564766631476.jpg (438x600, 40.9K)

I also enjoy poop smears on my dick

>tomboys
So you're attracted to lesbians? Got it

Attached: Vk2WMfkWtX0.jpg (598x599, 74.41K)

You are onto something

The bro science is that only women who were considered ugly in highschool developed personalities
Everyone else, had the ease of having their problems solved by bfs answering their desires.
Tomboys are cute, but after you have been dating for a couple years and she is happy to have it grow out for you, is the cutest.

based

>implying I can't get a surrogate to birth me children so I would raise them with my twink husband

Attached: fQX8UxLeND0.jpg (638x743, 90.76K)

>Marriage is necessary to being successful
>being able to live together, share grocery/rent expenses basically doubles your income overnight

I wish that was true but it just isn't. Even if your girlfriend is rational and financially responsible (which is very rare), the both of you still have the exact same needs as before. You will both spend the same money on everything except household utilities, rent, etc. And you can get the same benefit by finding a roommate or just living with your parents. Women don't help anything. They can be fun, but there is nothing practical about a long-term relationship. Been there, done that.

>but if you worship a transcend third

You mean something that has no proof for its existence and a lot of inconsistencies and outright bullshit in its scripture?

>not lifting for tomboys

Attached: tomb14121.jpg (980x1400, 249.75K)

>tfw most tomboys are dykes or (((feminists)))
Why.jpeg

Attached: TOMBOY baIt1.jpg (1200x1000, 70.9K)

>I want a woman that looks and acts like a man
Tomboyfags are truly gays in denial

Attached: tomboy152.jpg (1280x1918, 936.44K)

Attached: tomboy5132.jpg (1444x3856, 1.5M)

Attached: tomb not as tomboy but as in tombstone.png (948x813, 118.95K)

ah the neverending duality of trying to be the buffguy with a trap gf or the trap gf of a hot buff guy

The tomboy trope you guys desire so much is pretty much nonexistent. The ones that fit the mold are usually dykes or think they're men. You want an ideal woman that isn't real.

>not lifting for Allah

Attached: 1571710832752.jpg (396x396, 27.51K)

blessed post

Kill Your Self

Attached: 1576807186614.jpg (280x360, 77.28K)

haram

EW
She looks like she has weird pronouns in her twitter bio

Attached: hUAmumOrBPs.jpg (457x760, 72.26K)

>men with dick sucking lips

Yes.

Attached: 5FBD31BC-BA75-4B3E-9A5D-D2EBA87318BF.jpg (368x359, 94.96K)

Attached: shoe allah1124124.jpg (525x384, 34.94K)

Yeah ok you fucking dirt person.

Attached: 74528896_2822657437816316_1844497057004388352_n.png (614x614, 307.81K)

KYS FAGGOT
>KYS FAGGOT
KYS FAGGOT
>KYS FAGGOT
KYS FAGGOT
>KYS FAGGOT
KYS FAGGOT
>KYS FAGGOT
KYS FAGGOT
>KYS FAGGOT
KYS FAGGOT
>KYS FAGGOT
KYS FAGGOT
>KYS FAGGOT
KYS FAGGOT
>KYS FAGGOT

Finally a based take

Attached: cfaf279b5ad792efe6a03b1c6491d80e.jpg (736x1104, 170.74K)

Dangerously based

what about lifting for traps

Attached: tumblr_messaging_q41wlkeGI31wwi6ls_400.jpg (400x599, 16.19K)

Wrong.

Attached: vCF36qRPVy4.jpg (750x933, 151.16K)

You could, but if you're cautious you won't.
Heterosexual sex only requires sexual lust to have us not put a condom, a single time
Women narrativize sex, before she even lies down she thinks of it like a story. Pregnancy is the inevitable ending to every relationship story and they know that.

Yes. Because you dated an awful woman. It happens. Usually what happens is you date a woman better than you, you're a beast or act like one and she tames you down.thats relationship kino

You got pleb filtered sorry.
God isn't an entity. He's not like a man, or tea pot, or flying spaghetti monster.
He's an abstract. He is the laws of physics. The laws of thermo dynamics, he is the reason a desk falls off and accelerated just so as it hurdles to the ground
That's why his son Jesus is known as the word made flesh. What kept the world stabilized applied to man
It all goes back to Jesus

What about traps Yas Forums?
Do you really believe they are not gay?

So what you're saying is that god doesn't exist? There is nothing in the laws of physics that indicates existence of any kind of intelligent design. Physics, or chemistry, or biology don't have any kind of driving force behind them, at least there is no proof behind that. So god is fiction.

>thinks of god as a methaphor of the universe
>actually believes jesus really existed

Attached: 1572828043609.jpg (265x250, 16.32K)

Well user, i'm not him, but in theory an infinite mind, as an hypothetical god would be, could crate a cosmos of infinite complexity in an instant.
Doesn't seem like a human ("inteligent" as you say) design because it isn't, it would be infinitely complex.
Seems improbable tho.

checked, and I can't. if my roommate weren't a 175 pound 6' twink i'd be a little more inclined, but that'd just be weird. idk wtf he's going after with the whole religious boy getup and BCAA workouts.

>being such a philosophylet that you don't understand the difference between theistic personalism and classical theism

Not really. People get tired of each other. When you live with someone for years, you get tired of them. It's a few months usually, or a few years if you're a really good match. After than, the only reason you stay together is if you both force yourself and pretend to be happy and joyous. But you're not. Now that there isn't an economic reason for the family union or economic incentive to have children, fewer and fewer people do that. People become less and less connected. There is less and less reason to interact with anyone for any length of time at all. And wether that's bad or good, nothing is going to change that. You see it happening across the world, on every continent. 100 years ago a European families had 10 children. Now it's uncommon for any developed country's family, wither European, Asian or American to have more than 2 children. Which is already below the replacement rate.

essential post of the tomboy canon

Attached: lfu6oupduaw11.jpg (1055x1639, 785.73K)

Whatever science hasn't yet proven doesn't have proof of its existence. Simple as that.

youtube.com/watch?v=YrXjmHdA1tg

There are a great deal of questions science is categorically incapable of answering.

I see no arguments, explain with your words, or GTFO

Attached: 1571032640192.gif (220x162, 22.92K)

forgot this link

If the people who put man on the moon, split the atom, cured plagues and created the computer can't answer a question, then some random asshole in a robe definitely can't either. Some things are unknown, for now. That's it. This doesn't prove or disprove anything.

If a God does exist, he should be fucking dead for what he allowed to happen through human history. All the injustice, idiocy, chaos and pointless death and suffering. If he does exist, he is either an insane sadist, doesn't understand or give a shit about humans, or is impotent. Neither of those justify respect, let alone worship.

what's trad

"Traditional" I guess. Some kind of made-up ideal of a subservient housewife Yas Forums worships that ceased to exist in the 18th century.

Some random asshole in a robe can answer any question, just like some random asshole in a lab coat can answer any question. What matters is whether or not the answer is true. Science is explicitly designed to study the material world and only the material world, and for that it is useful. It gives no insight into anything eternal, fixed, permanent, only the observation of contingencies, atoms colliding with atoms. Science can't make you immortal. God can, and He will, if you let Him.

"Random asshole" in a lab coat built the world around you, including the device you've posted this garbage from. He's the reason your great grandfather didn't die from smallpox and your father didn't have to work in an asbestos factory and die of black lung at 40. He's the reason your mother didn't die in childbirth along with you and that you were neither devoured by a wild animal nor had to die in some worthless turf war at the behest of the inbred local lord.
On the other hand, robe asshole never did anything but told people how to live and collected tithe. I think I know who I should listen to. The scientific method is the only thing that gets shit done and makes the world better.

>Wears suit to formal events
> did these people think we're a gay couple again?
>Doesnt wear makeup
>Owns boyshorts

Imagine living in a society where regular women are such cringy degenerates that you rather go out with one cosplaying as yourself.

Attached: 1579088949283.jpg (1765x1200, 248.19K)

>He's the reason your great grandfather didn't die from smallpox
All of my ancestors managed to reproduce without a smallpox vaccine, retard
>your father didn't have to work in an asbestos factory
Who invented the asbestos factory?
>He's the reason your mother didn't die in childbirth
My mother gave birth to all four of her children without any necessary medical intervention.
God created the world around us, including the fingers you're using to type out this nonsense. Your hostility towards religion is obtuse and intellectually lazy, science itself isn't hostile to religion. Many scientists are and were Christians, and it is not a matter of listening to science or religion, they do not disagree. The Catholic says that the condom is evil because it prevents conception, the scientist says that the condom prevents conception.
>The scientific method is the only thing that gets shit done and makes the world better
No one denies that science can make the world better. If we want the world to get better, is there any true alternative to virtue? A world full of thieving lying murderous wretches is not a world anyone wants to live in, whether or not they have iPhones. Science cannot solve the problem of sin, because science cannot determine what is sin. It cannot determine what reality is preferable to usher in and what potentiality is to be avoided, you must go beyond the bounds of science to answer that question, and once you are there, you are no longer standing on scientific ground. You are in the domain of morality, and the only legitimate source of morality is deity. Every alternative morality to Deistic morality is simply an expression of subjective preference on the behalf of the individual making the claim.

>Heterosexual sex only requires sexual lust to have us not put a condom
Okay, but how is that better than planning to have kids and investing a lot of time and energy into it?
Which one sounds better?
>Your dad and I wanted to have you so bad, we spent lots of effort (and money) to bring you into this world
>Lmao one night we forgot to use a condom and that's how you were conceived lol jesus truly blessed us

Attached: EOHt3XKX4AIULgf.jpg (1112x915, 432.81K)

Why not both?
>>Your dad and I wanted to have you so bad, we spent lots of effort (and money) to bring you into this world
>and that's how you were conceived lol jesus truly blessed us