The New York Times, the most reputable established paper, just fucked all of you up with the power of SCIENCE. How do you respond?
Yas Forumsbros BTFO
Other urls found in this thread:
medium.com
twitter.com
>american mutt genetics are prone obsetity
i belief it.
i got rekt
"enviornmental factors", yeah an environment where shoving shite down your gullet is normal. FAT CUNTS BTFO
>Parents provide all food for children
>Fatasfatass runs in families
>It must be genetic!
Brilliant
Yep. Can't possibly explain how I lost 50lbs in a family full of fat asses. Must be a genetic anomaly.
Times is fake news. Stop consooming media and make your own n=1 success story.
There is abundant evidence it's genetic, but it's related to willpower mostly. That's the real redpill. Not metabolism, but genetically determined ability to resist temptation. A poignant argument for eugenics imo.
It's about averages, mate. Everyone, given access to a given amount of calories, will have an average tendency toward a given weight. It can be overcome in some cases, but most of the time will not. Outliers do not disprove the rule. See my other answer.
Nothing solidified how stupid people who say, "because SCIENCE" like taking a design of experiments class.
Academia is really fucked.