Women prefer girth

I'm 6.5×5.5", every single girl I've been me told me I'm average sized, three told me I'm thicker than average but only as an off comment and it seemed it qasnt as important as length was to them.
Then I found out im supposedly thicker than 95% of people.
If women really do prefer girth, please send them my way cause I havent been meeting any.

And then you woke up

I had a fwb one time. Her ex was hung like a horse and she preferred sex with me, and I'm average.

I don't even mean she told me she preferred sex with me. She would ignore him and fuck me all the time. She hooked up with him a few times but she loved the shit out of me. Dick size, think about it like big tits... cool but not be all end all. A lot of girls don't really care as long as it's not an extreme

cope harder, shrimpy

I was in the exact same situation, ended up dating the fwb and she cucked me with her huge ex anyway

Current gf says her ex who was 9" (she says she measured) was the only time she had an orgasm just from penetration alone. I dont want to sound insecure but I really doubt an average dick is enough, unless somehow I came across every size queen on this side of the Mississippi

damn guys i fuck so many girls

Any other girthers not believe when a girl tells you your dick is really thick? Doesn’t seem thick to me. Maybe porn has created unrealistic expectations

haha yeah man i fuck so many girls, so many girls are telling me how thick my dick is but i know its really small tee hee

I'm not liking those vibes user

Incel alert

I know right ? I'm drowning in pussey like

salty

Attached: rodney.gif (460x460, 2.4M)

Women in the hookup game are masochists that get off to pain, hence they want dick to stab their cervix. Tho 6.5 inches should hit the cervix of almost all women so i don't really understand you desu.

thanks for this brother, you give me hope as a long girthlet

Attached: ilistentoblackbear.png (150x148, 7.4K)

Reminder that not a single 9+ Inches penis found in over 50K dicks who tested medically. You're an incel larping or the girl is toxic and want to bring you down by lying or she just measured him from the balls.

I find it funny how 90% of the girls experienced 9 incher in their life at least once.

he's larping, i've seen this comment over 10 times already, It's pencile dicklet seething

There are SEVERAL people in this very thread right now who desperately need to have sex

I'm not larping, just saying my experiences
Again if be happy to be proven wrong, maybe I only stumble across whores

measure it.

Sub 4.5 is girthlet, 4.5-5 is average, 5-5.3 is above average, 5.3+ is thick, 5.8+ is tuna can.

>(p < .001)

WTF DOES THIS MEAN?

>tfw pass the toilet paper roll test
later virgins

Attached: 5DFCEA6C-A6A8-4B53-A562-9669E7798A6F.jpg (720x818, 55.47K)

I love this "girth matters more than length". It is pure suicide fuel for a dicklet like me with only 4 inches in circumference. How is a girl supposed to feel something from my thin penis? I will never be sexually desirable for a female.
Yet they all say real incels don't exist...

Attached: tumblr_ny75zdfLxg1trs6v2o1_1280-9071.png.jpg (640x640, 109.76K)

A fucking finger is enough to satisfy a woman. Get over yourself, unsecure retards

what if only the head doesnt go in? i mean, my dight cant be as thick as the toilet roll, its just that the head is a bit bigger than the roll hole.

The word midwit was quite literally invented by actual fucking morons who realised that retarded people held the same opinions as them, so instead of admitting how retarded they were and changing their views they invented this legitimately insane intelligence horseshoe theory where really stupid and really smart people have the same opinions
the mental gymnastics stupid people go through to convince themselves they are smart is genuinely shocking

Women are spacially retarded. They can't do measurements/estimates. Why is it so hard for men to understand this? There's a reason their iq is lower. Why they suck at STEM. Suck at driving.

Attached: gaddafi.jpg (456x337, 119.57K)

True. Also
>t. midwit

Attached: soy264.png (644x800, 42.65K)

NOOOOO WOMAN ARE BAAAAAD NOOOOOO

lot of girls dont like big penises because it hurts them
theres unironically a subplebbit called r/bigdickproblems for this reason
some girls love it, most girls dont, just find a small asian girl, she will have a small vagina
im a 5.5'' average dick maybe people on here will say im subaverage whatever i dont care, ive been with 12 girls and its been fine every time. first little asian girl i banged when i put it in, just the head she screamed as was like stop stop stop go slow. and i literally had to wait a minute and slowly go in inch by inch for 5 minutes waiting for it to open her up.
tl;dr its fine just be open and confident about your little wiener, find a small girl with a small vagina, and when in doubt fall back on the 'well then its small enough to go in your ass isnt it?' line
we all gonna make it user

>women have lower IQ
>The results suggest a negligible sex difference in g.
researchgate.net/publication/222534750_Negligible_Sex_Differences_in_General_Intelligence
>Women suck at stem
just entirely wrong
>suck at driving
Men have more car accidents, more traffic violations, and more DUIs. So again, wrong.

Imagine having such strong opinions while also having so little knowledge

110-120 IQ isnt a "really smart person" holy shit whats your IQ to think that 110-120 IQ people are really smart. 130 is the bare fucking minimum to be considered smart. and 135+ to be considered really fucking smart.
what a fucking rube LOL

Is english your fifth or sixth language? I didn't say that 110-120 iq was really smart. They are considered "midwits" in the meme. The midwit meme goes hand in hand with the belief that people of 130iq have the same opinions. See pic for example.
Please try to control your tard rage outbursts and save them for when you actually know what you're talking about.

Attached: ENK5vCDW4AIPOoX.jpg (750x669, 48.56K)

Attached: identifying_women_online.png (1887x2545, 788.57K)

r/bigdickproblems is probably the biggest suicide fuel for dicklets ever. There are tons of threads about how easily they make girls orgasm and provide them pleasure any lesser endowed partners couldn't. It seems that with lube, foreplay and the right "training", almost every female is capable of taking a big dick. However, once she is able to enjoy it, she would never want to go back.

I haven't got a clue why you've replied to me with this picture. I didn't reference social opinion once in my post. I didn't insult you, I genuinely didn't say a single thing that even remotely relates to the image you've posted. Just google it yourself. "Sex difference in IQ". "Car accidents by sex". "STEM GPA men vs women". These things aren't hard to find. The information is at your fingertips, user. I believe in you.

Statistically, women are average intelligence.
Less car accidents does not mean a group is better at driving.
GPA is not a measure of success in a field.

I fucked your mom until she croaked.

>statistically women are average intelligence
I have no idea what this means. Are you suggesting that statistics say that all women have roughly 100 IQ? Are you retarded? Did you even look at the study I posted?
>Less car accidents does not mean a group is better at driving
>GPA is not a measure of success in a field
Please enlighten me as to the measures you use to decide what makes a good driver and what makes someone good at STEM.

imagine being this delusional.

Their spatial IQ is lower by 10-15% which is a lot, they compensate in memory and verbal abilities. Also there are basically 4+ men for every woman above 130IQ

100IQ-Average
110IQ-Above average
120IQ-Smart
130IQ-Very Intelligent
135IQ-Almost Genius
140IQ-Genius
150IQ and above-Basically alien tier compared to average

>t. virgin incel cuck who gets off to SPH

Where did you get the figure for 10-15% lower spatial IQ? Not saying it's wrong, just would like to see a source.
Also, there are basically 4+ men for every woman below 90IQ as well. The consensus seems to be the spread of IQ is more diverse for men but the averages are the same

just get good with your fingers and learn how to penetrate at the right angle tonhit her g spot

>Current gf says her ex who was 9" (she says she measured) was the only time she had an orgasm just from penetration alone.

cant lie bro but any girl that says that to your face is not one you should give anymore attention to.

not even me who replied here

bro you can think im delusional i dont care. i dont even need my dick to make a woman cum hard. i made my last gf cum just by sucking and tonguing her ear the first time we hooked up again after i broke up with her. why? because i knew she liked having her ears played with and she ached for my touch so badly that anything i did to her would make her cum because i mentally owned her body mind and soul.
deal with it user, your big/small dick doesnt not make you special

Firstly, this study was taken at a private university that is fairly elite in Spain in the 90s. So this does not represent women as a whole. Second, there were way more males tested than female, which can skew the data. Third, two or three of the four tests administered were tasks women are typically favored in. And fourth, the test says that multiple subtests are needed for accurate data and that the paper merely is meant to point this out - not prove g scores are similar between men and women. Also I don't think this study has reproductions.
>Please enlighten me as to the measures you use to decide what makes a good driver and what makes someone good at STEM.
Good driving doesn't have a measure right now. And STEM success doesn't either. But I can say that GPA and accident counts are good not measures for this.

Ultimate cope thread.

>bluh bluh boo bpfff i can't produce any evidence that suggests significant intelligence difference between men and women but your study is wrong pprppfffnlnnxxx
>bbuuh buh buh i dont have a measure but yours are wrong because uhhhhh i said so rrhhhhdddfffff

Women are proportionally more likely to cause car accidents. Men are simply on the road a lot more, hence why they are part of more car accidents.

As for intelligence, the differences in IQ scores are not very significative, but the variance for men is a lot higher, leading to a much higher % of geniuses, hence why major contributions are mostly the work of men, since they are mostly the work of geniuses.

biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.17.952010v1

Variance also applies to other areas of cognition and also personality, which leads to the ''women are npc'' (less variance in political opinions, philosophical beliefs, taste in general, etc.)

%100 but I get called virgin incel if I say bigger the better

What is greater male variability?
That just about answers all of your concerns. But since you are a retard who only looks at the average,

Spatial
sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081217124430.htm
Men are better.

Spatial and mathematical approximation
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779996/
Men are better.

Sports, medicine, literature, philosophy, math, engineering, physics, art, motorsports, etc. Men at the top.

Attached: brain.jpg (480x480, 21.99K)

You never asked for evidence. All I have to do is show that the study and claims you posted are wrong.

Attached: 1554905891551.png (478x523, 168.43K)

>women are proportionally more likely to cause car accidents
Evidence?
>variance for men is a lot higher leading to much higher % of geniuses
and also a much higher percentage of retards. Gotta remember it goes both ways.
>variance also applies to other areas of cognition and also personality
nope, you can't just extrapolate like that from IQ variance buddy. You need separate evidence.

researchgate.net/publication/308765268_Sex_Differences_in_Intelligence

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3169128/figure/fig02/

researchgate.net/publication/242788102_Sex_differences_in_intelligence_and_brain_size_A_developmental_theory

researchgate.net/publication/6962462_Intelligence_Is_there_a_sex_difference_in_IQ_scores

And i can go on, the literature is full with this, it's well known subject of studying, not to test the difference but why is that.

Also it's a myth that women score the same as men on average (full scale IQ), men usually tend to outperform by 2-5 points (Which you can possibly attribute to spatial ability differences)

Spatial and mathematical approximation
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779996/
Men are better.

Sports, medicine, literature, philosophy, math, engineering, physics, art, motorsports, etc. Men at the top.

Driving
trafficsafetystore.com/blog/who-causes-accidents/
Men are better. Men drive more miles also take more risk are alcoholics more than women yet women are still worse drivers when you look at the rate which is the only thing that matters. All else being equal, men are still better.

Men are also at the bottom. Unironic retards, addicts, criminals, risk takers, work deaths, homeless.
Greater male variability. Your focus on average is literally dumb normie tier.

>inb4 but misogyny
Women prefer working with people
Men prefer working with things
weforum.org/agenda/2018/02/does-gender-equality-result-in-fewer-female-stem-grads

For each of these links, there are dozens more. You only cherry picked some bullshit and even then you managed to draw the wrong conclusions. Therefore, you are a retard.

Attached: 156455353524.png (500x460, 25.05K)

You didn't say they were wrong though you just pointed out that they're not conclusive lmfao
do you have better evidence? no? Then you're wrong
The study you posted about mathematical approximation also says that women consistently outperform men at exact arithmetic so... Not really sure what point you're making.

>men at the top
Ah, you're one of those smoothbrains who likes to pretend that the systematic barriers preventing women from entering these fields weren't only removed within the last 20-30 years or so and don't have any effect on the sex split in them. Good to know.

Did it occur to you that she was straight lying to your face?

>nope, you can't just extrapolate like that from IQ variance buddy. You need separate evidence.

You actually can. "muh evidence" lol you fit the midwit meme in this thread perfectly.

Imagine mocking someone for wanting evidence for a claim and then thinking that you are the smart one in the conversation lmfao holy shit

>You didn't say they were wrong though you just pointed out that they're not conclusive
The measures themselves are not wrong. It is wrong to use them for the situation.

Yes and earlier I said men are better spatially. Also stop ignoring good evidence and pretending to be smart without providing sources yourself. You cherry pick bullshit studies then when it gets refuted you act retarded and don't provide something better. You were provided with information that shows men vary more so they are both at the top and bottom of all fields and iq. 30 years of no barriers is at least a generation and a half. Women in egalitarian societies suck at stem and prefer other social fields where they perform better. Yet men are still at the top of those fields.
You are presented with evidence. You merely posted one bullshit link. You ignore the good evidence then hurr durr I demand evidence without providing anything yourself. Rational and logical arguments are made against your positions. You provide nothing.

Attached: 1581566071605.jpg (550x550, 38.44K)

trafficsafetystore.com/blog/who-causes-accidents/

As for the other thing, yes and no. Variance isn't just true for IQ, but for brain structure as well (probably explain things like higher autism rate, etc.)

Personality is a function of g to some extent, so to the extent that it is a function of g, it will also be influenced by the difference in variance between the sexes. As for direct evidence that it exist, I can't be bothered to look it up ; data relating to taste in potential mates certainly seems to show that there's less variance in taste when it comes to women looking for men.

Any shitty street interview confirms this.