ITT: RatCHADS discuss Insomniac's magnum opus. This thread will also hit bump limit, because that's how RatCHADS roll.
Ratchet Thread
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Gonna plug in my PS3 soon so I can plat ACiT again, and finally play Into the Nexus. I haven't played it even though I picked it up a long time ago.
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
What's with all the Ratchet threads lately? I'm not complaining, it just seems odd.
>Completed: 2, 3, SM, SAC, ToD, Q4B
>In progress: Crack in Time
>Not started yet: 1, Deadlocked, Nexus, FFA, A4O
>FFA, A4O
Ignore them.
The discussion is pretty good here. Not too much furfagging, and most people actually have some decent anecdotes from the franchise. It's nice here.
How are you enjoying ACiT? Does it hold after 11 years later?
I think it's just because Ratchet threads are comfy without being safe spaces. There's no rivalry between fanbases that can derail a thread (like earthbound vs undertale). Likewise, Ratchet fans are so unanimous in agreement that the series lost its soul that shitposters can't start fights about whether the remake is better than the original or not. As far as actual points of contention (GC vs UYA), it's nothing serious enough to devolve a thread into shit flinging, even if several anons have their panties in a knot.
Ratchet threads are unsinkable. It helps that the games have lots of things that are underdiscussed. There's shit like
>what the hell are the gadgebots
>gadgetron vs megacorp
>what's with the mothership from GC
>what species is Qwark
>discussing literally any of the dozens of one off robots and creatures from the various planets
>why is Insomniac so wasteful with their assets