Can somebody explain to me why people consider this the worst souls game? Some people, even on Yas Forums...

I just beat DS2 and dont understand anything of the story

Was the throne the same as the kiln of the first flame?
did the king steal the throne from the giants?
are the dlc kingdoms in the past and in the same geographical area, or are they all different kingdoms in different lands?

why couldnt nashandra access to the throne herself and needed me to do it?

It’s boomer cope

Throne is different, King stole the throne from the giants, DLC kingdoms are present day in different kingoms/lands, don't think about Nashandra too much because they didn't. I think at best she needed the king's ring to open the door.

I genuinely liked Ds2 more. It obviously had a rushed development but at least they were experimenting with new ideas. Ds3 is just Bloodborne: Souls edition.

ok, that makes sense, at least the ring part.

Some people didn't like it because it was kind of linear compared to 1 and especially compared to 2. I still enjoyed it though.

It lacks soul.

Still a great game though.

cause they already played Demon Souls, DS1 and 2 and Bloodborne and the game wasn't hard anymore

New bad
Old good

DS3 was pretty based for invading and trolling when the playerbase was at its peak. Cutting the bridge for easy pale tongues, being a watchdog and staying near the crabs or just being a cunt as an Aldrich faithful using the knights as reinforcement. I miss that shit