Poll time
What does Yas Forums think is the worst smash game?
Vote and explain your reasoning
strawpoll.com
Poll time
What does Yas Forums think is the worst smash game?
Vote and explain your reasoning
strawpoll.com
Other urls found in this thread:
64 is the best one because it has 0 fire emblem characters
4 should really be split into the two different versions. I feel 3DS holds up a lot better on its own than Wii U, despite the latter's greater amount of content.
>Update in 40 minutes
What do you guys think, spirit event or tourney?
Tourny probably.
The only correct opinions are 4 and Brawl.
Brawl was so bad that they had to have a fan mod fix the game into being fun
Having played both 3ds and Wii U extensively, I have to say that the Wii U version is worse asides from the graphical improvements and controller support. 3ds has better stages, better modes, a non shit classic mode, smash run. I feel like it also has a better presentation too, but both versions of 4 have shit menu's.
4U, because it has nothing over Ultimate.
43DS atleast had Smash Run.
melee gets ruined by its fan base.
I can forgive 64 for it's short comings because it was the first game of it's kind so they could only go up.
That being said
Brawl has the worst gameplay
Smash 4 has the worst balancing
4, it has way less competitive appeal than Melee but also way less casual appeal compared to Brawl and ultimate.
Sm4sh shitters were also the most obnoxious player base since they acted like it was viable to play/watch when their meta was completely fucked and they also spawned all those stinky memes.
The worst Smash game is, sorry to say, Ultimate. Even 4 had better online and more mechanical depth.
So does Ultimate
I will see if Ultimate becomes my true least favorite in Smash Bros series when these next two years pass
alright, what is it
ultimate=melee>brawl>64>4
ultimate has a godly roster, the best balance so far, and has more depth than brawl and maybe 4, but not as much as melee
melee has the most depth but has a lot of balance issues
brawl has the best content but is janky as fuck and balanced even worse than melee
64 has too much hitstun, one good stage, smaller movesets, and a pathetic roster compared to the rest of the franchise
4 is just an outdated version of ultimate at this point, the only thing it has going for it is the best online which doesn't make it worth playing
also judging a game by it's fanbase is fucking retarded
4 (WiiU)
It doesn't have anything over the other entries. 64 is first one, so that one gets a pass for it; Melee has Adventure mode and original trophies; Brawl has Subspace (and if you want to count it, the better Mod scene); and Ultimate has the sheer number of fighters and stages, with a (shittier) story mode too. Even 3DS has Smash Run.
If you wanna talk about gameplay, it's behind Melee and Modded Brawl. I don't feel comfortable in saying its better than Ultimate YET.
what's even wrong with the fanbase anyway? I hear more bitching about melee than from it.
I think I wholly agree with this.
Wii U.
>released on the most powerful console in the world but had to cut characters that were in since the GameCube game just because the handheld version it barely interacted with couldn't handle it
>paid DLC contained two characters from previous games
Competitive aspects, but not necessarily about the game's quality:
>balanced worse than a game that has way more characters
>a lot of the top players were much bigger faggots than Ultimate's
>no one took it seriously at all
melee
>thrown together in 9 months
>everyone falls like rocks
>vertical balance was shit
>horizontal balance was shit
>25 character roster. 4 were crazy op
>unintended movement exploit defined competitive play
>no items, final destination, tourneyfags can burn
melee took the mascot fighter spirit of smash and immediately nose dived it into 'philandering blue-haired homosexual figure skating on a platform in space: the game'. Meleefags complain about other installments of the series for not having the wave-dashing accident to capitalize on a useless skill they wasted portions of their lives refining.
based
What makes Wii U have the best online? If you're talking about quickplay, For Glory was shit, there's a reason tournaments don't just take place on FD. For Fun wasn't even usable, everyone is just having taunt parties or standing around doing nothing.
Ultimate goes to your preferences 99% of the time after like the first or second update the game ever had.
If you're talking about tournament rooms, I do kinda miss that, was way better for Yas Forumseekends.
It amazes me how Smashfags got super triggered when you called Ultimate Sm4.5h but literally everyone says it's the worst because it's just ultimate but worse.
The reason Sm4sh is actually the worst game because it's slow as fuck and has the worst balancing out of any game in the series. People bitch about Melee not having viable characters. Sm4sh meta is literally just Bayonetta and Cloud.
It's actually better than Brawl, but Ultimate shits on both of them.
>has the worst balancing out of any game in the series
that's brawl though
Meta Knight was annoying but he never destroyed the meta as bad.
I'm not saying 4 has good online, just that it had the best out of the franchise
ultimate's ranking system makes it so people play very obnoxiously because people are afraid of losing gsp, along with not being able to switch characters now
for glory only being on fd was stupid but being fd or battlefield isn't great either
i never did tournament rooms so idk anything about them
Yes he did
What the fuck?
Not saying Meta Knight was not a problem. Just saying that Cloud and Bayonetta where way worse and that Meta Knight never ruined the meta to the degree that they did.
youtube.com