Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
Perfectly balanced, as all things should be
>reviews
>user reviews
>mattering
>Except as a way for internet e-warriors and incels to express rage at female/trans characters or only local saves
Seething Snoybois in a panic.
Why do you care about a game for f*mnoids and/aka children?
im gril!
honestly, why would snoybois care enough about this game to review bomb it?
>A platform where people that didn't buy the game can vote
Seethe snoy
wow im so triggered
does laughs in trans mean laughing while contemplating suicide?
come visit my town
Because console war stupidity knows no bounds.
>So(n)yggers leaving a bad score despite never playing this game because they are again threatened by Nintendo
LMAO
laughs in trans is that "he he" laugh trough gritted teeth when you're trying to pretend you're not seething
damn that is so fashchic I love it I'm pogging sweetheart.
If the actual critics had any semblance of integrity their score would be 3 points lower.
Had to look it up. Found this.
Looks like a reasonable complaint
Can't he just create a second profile and play on that?
Why are people pretending a pseudo social sim isnt shit tier? Like the gameplay is fucking terrible, you just decorate shit in a skinner box with no real end goals.
The board has come this far to defend shit casual games made for facebook gamers, amazing.
except it was known before release that it was 1 island per system, so he could have coordinated with his brother and they'd create the together. Once you're past like week 1 the only difference is non-reps can't request infrastructure
Most of the negative reviews revolve around that complaint.
lol no
You need to not only buy another copy of the game, but another switch as well.
No, Nintendo designed it so you cannot have more than one island because their fanbase will tolerate any amount of abuse. I know a girl who bought a second switch and a second copy of animal crossing so that she and her husband can both play the fucking game.
AC existed before Zynga, et al. Action games aren't the only real games; it's OK to not always have to kill or beat something.
Maybe it would help for you to consider games like AC as a different hobby or aspect of gaming. Like how someone can be really into baseball but hate golf or swimming even though they're all sports.
>except it was known before release
Your point? Announcing greedy garbage doesn't make it better.
>Most of the negative reviews revolve around that complaint.
Yeah because basically everyone who shares their Switch with their roommate, partner, family or whatever has that problem.
Wow, that's stupid. So it's completely console locked?
Reasonable complaints don't make a 1 out of 10 rating.
They can play together on one island. The whole series is about becoming part of and/or building and contributing to a community. Imagine not being able to do so with your spouse so you spend $350+ to gloss over the fact that you don't know how to work together or compromise
>I'm going to say "skinner box" even though it doesn't apply in the slightest or mean anything in this context because it bad
Reasonable reviews don't give 10 our of 10 ratings either. And if I bought a game and was locked out of content because of bullshit like this, I'd be pissed, reasonable be damned.
>the gameplay loop is great but I didn't get to play the shitty tutorial
>1/10
>reasonable
I'm gonna have to push back on that
Way to out yourself as a newfag. Yas Forums had a metric fuckton of threads about New Leaf as well, but you wouldn't know that because that was 8 years ago. 8 years ago you were either a fetus or browsing somewhere that wasn't Yas Forums.
somebody read reviews?