Unironically the best handheld system

unironically the best handheld system

Attached: 71kOcbOeLNL._AC_SL1500_.jpg (1500x691, 113.84K)

cringe

It had the potential to be 100% but sony fucked up hardcore.

I bought 2 Vita's while I didn't even get a second 3DS once my original one broke. Vita won in my eyes

It had nice hardware for the time but it has no games and the homebrew scene is horrible because nobody owns one or cares enough to develop for it.
8 years later and it still can't run GBA or SNES games without speedhacks or overclocking the cpu lmao

Handheld gaming was a mistake, It's supposed to be a "gaming" device. Somehow smartphones always out-power them withing a year of their release. And the best we get are last gen ports. You are better off playing gachas with mobile data.

Is very good.

I'd wager Switch takes its crown just because of its massive gsmes library.

Still mad we never got Bioshock Vita, though.

Attached: 1587418226788.png (635x351, 471.13K)

what a fucking waste of effort, this could have been psp 2 if sony wasn't fucking retarded

can i hack my vita and still be able to use remote play

Yes

Yes you can. Hell, take it a step further by streaming a PC with Moonlight.

But I can't play PSP games on native resolution.

The vita is my favorite shitter device.

Yes. the only thing that's ever gotten anyone banned with a hacked vita was playing a game before release and uploading trophies.

This and you can play every game online just fine without risk

>playing gachas
>playing
invalid post

Can we all agree that the vita was made easily hackable purposely? And it's purpose was to make a retro handheld labeled "sony" to avoid legal issues.

Is it feasible to effectively play PS2 games on the shitter this way - streaming from my pc running pcsx2?

>can play all PS1 and PSP games
>can play all retro emulators
>can Remote Play to play PS3/PS4/PC games
Nah.
Sony made Vita to be a an all-out system but they fucked it up with the very expensive memory cards and lack of western devs interest.

Nintendo learned from Vita and focused on getting support from Western devs to make Switch a success.

>more difficult to hack than the psp
>can't run retro games any better than the psp
???

In theory it can. And in practice the snes9x fork runs snes games far far far better than leltroarch or the snes9x psp version.
The issue is no one bothered making any homebrew for vita, so 99% of people are using shitty, old cores for retroarch, or emulating shit through adrenaline, where of course it's not going to outpace a psp because it IS one.

Is retroarch vita bad or should I just install standalone emus?

Soul Sacrifice Delta was and still is GOAT.

That's the point I'm making. There exists a snes9x fork for vita, and an mgba fork for vita (or maybe it's vba-m I don't remember). They both run games way better than retroarch or their PSP counterparts (well, gba is a mixed bag, there were hundreds of forks of gpsp that eventually made every game full speed.)
Retroarch is just mediocre in every regard, and also has issues with writing to sram for games, so you'll have to play and leave it sitting there for sometimes upwards of 2-3 minutes for it to write to sram after you save ingame, otherwise it won't actually save. Savestates work, thankfully.
You're genuinely better off playing the PSP emulators over retroarch for anything that's not SNES or gba, and using the native vita emulators for those.

>inb4 that faggot posts his 7 blue vitas

Top tier smartphones also cost $1,000 or more, user. It’s not exactly a mystery.

Not when most of its games have huge performance problems.

that's not GBA

just unlock the cpu speed.
it's very easy.

Nah, it’s either the Game Boy Advance SP or Nintendo 3DS