Aren't we repeating a history in some way? Which character switch seems more justified in this comparison?
TLOU2 vs MGS2
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
Mgs2 raiden was shit. At least Tranny kills a jew
Cant compare then until TLOU 2 is out.
You see there are two things are unrealistic with TLOU2
>1.
A proper women could never be this buff, especially in a zombie apocalypse with all the gyms being closed. How is this thing even supposed to find a sex partner?
>2.
In a real life scenario Joel would have crushed this dykes skull in a matter of seconds. Men just have bigger muscle, bone and brain structure.
MGS2 seems just more logical.
this is quite a stupid thread, the idea of a beautiful samurai is part of the thing.
i haven't played tlou though
but yeah you look retarded to me op, maybe don't spout every dumb thought that enters your mind.
Raiden, because he's fucking cool and we got MGR out of it.
kojima's mistake was marketing mgs2 as a game where you continued snake's story, it should have been ambiguous as to who the main character was in marketing and at the beginning of the game, i.e. "Snake" should have been Raiden (with a mask) on the tanker instead rather than the abrupt character switch. would have gone down much better. not even into TLOU and this is absolutely retarded, shit devs
Mgs2, especialy if you see it separated from games that came later, and belive in symulation interpretation of game.
Raiden looks more feminine than the thing on the left.
raiden was shit
mgs2 was shit
and kojima pretended mgs2 was with snake
dunno about Tlou2 because i dont give a fuck about a shit sequel to a shit game