The Great Debate

The Great Debate

Attached: CA63C091-EB89-4712-A199-18A46FCCCBD4.jpg (2048x2048, 415.78K)

I enjoyed the first one way more. Story of 2 didn't really do anything for me. Too many characters that were never really developed, and thus I couldn't care about.

2 is unironically the least fun game of all time
i don’t know how anyone could enjoy it

There is no debate.
RDR is a better game.

RDR 2 is better in everything, people that disagree are nostalgiafag and contrarians that can't accept the fact that Rockstar is still doing good games

Once I realized how pointless all the extra shit in 2 was I just kind of lost interest. The camp upgrade stuff being pointless, and by extension money as a whole, was frustrating.

I loved RDR2

>RDR 2 is better in everything
RDR and RDR 2 aren't much different from a gameplay perspective.

How the fuck is that supposed to be Arthur in the RDR2 artwork? It looks nothing like him

The first one was better, way less poz and modern leftist politics inserted into time periods where it wouldn't exist.

Yeah, that shit was wildly out of place.

Name 3 times that actually happened.

I bet you fucking can't.

A southern country town filled with former slave owners never saying nigger is enough for me.

They have an attention span.

I played the game once, but let's see.
>Just about every side character was diversity victim mode that had story arcs straight out of a kids after school special
>Arthur was a ruthless criminal but for some unexplained reason he was sympathetic to the plight of non-whites
>Arthur escorts a feminist march, and is sympathetic to the suffragette movement
>Arthur takes special pleasure in beating up racists
Game takes place in 1889 and he's a criminal, but has modern leftist political and social views. It's all forced and cringe af.

>Heist
>Move camp
>Heist
>Move camp
>Heist
>Move camp
>Die of TB

>not being racist and respecting women is leftist

Fuck off election tourist.

Attached: 1576980407144.jpg (501x697, 104.46K)

>everybody in 1889 was so tolerant and had my neoliberal worldview
You fuck off, brainlet. They weren't telling a story, so much as they were propagandizing their audience.

Not him, but fuck off back to plebbit.

II is obscenely boring.

Arthur is a fag who only has fun his own way. The moment anyone else tries to have fun he bitches and moans about it.
Meanwhile John is a man who had fun once and hated it. Never tried it again. Thats why hes better.

>push button
>move analogue stick
>keep pushing buttons
>finish game

You didn't even play the game

The main story was weak as fuck and you know it. It was a story that didn't even need to be told. Nothing from that game added anything of substance to the story of the first game, and it was a lazy loop on top of that.

Name a protagonist in that game that didn't have a modern neoliberal worldview.

I played both games for the first time back to back and RDR2 is the clear winner. Say what you want about RDR2 taking a long time to get going, but when it does, it does for the rest of the game.
RDR1 is filled for the first 70% of the game and when things finally start to pick up, it ends.

Is filler*

fuck off back to r*ddit nigger, holy shit

>raised by dutch an anarcho-primitivist who outright stated his support for the paris commune
>b-b-but y arthur have egalitarian views!?
brainlet retard

Being obnoxiously racist with no attempt at humor is pretty damn reddit.

Attached: 1514145557801.png (944x4013, 662.39K)

Fpbp

Yes.

Attached: red_dead_revolver.jpg (1400x1400, 224.56K)