Is it foolish to get one's hope up for this game?

Is it foolish to get one's hope up for this game?

Attached: vampiremas2.jpg (1280x720, 331.17K)

Bewbs.

Surprised they allow attractive women in a non-Japanese game.

Literally less features than a 2006(?) game. Less clans and no third person perspective.

Also, this and beyond good and evil 2 are on that list of games that I'm not even sure they will ever come out

They changed her model LOL

Probably they saw people's reaction was positive and them changed her. Them when I say western devs does ugly women not out of incompetence but on purpose, you fags say I'm being delusional

pic of new model?

Attached: vtm-bloodlines2-cosplay-guide-v01-5511-1650e1.jpg (1920x1080, 788.45K)

Looks the same to me

there hasn't be a single positive piece of info this game except for the writing team...

gameplay-wise it actually looks even worse than the original

Very. I have no idea why people got excited last year.

Tits look the same but the face is uglier.

yo, is that fucking Mariska Hargitay from law and order: SVU?

thats relative but at least she isn't a fucking abortion like most westerns devs do

the guy in the back looks hot.

Maybe Mad Men lady decided she didn't want her face used because SFM/Blender porn.

I think a reasonable expectation is 75% as good as VtmB. In other words, still pretty good, but not anything that's going to revolutionize gaming.

looks nothing like her originally

>first person

Attached: 800px-Maddoxtacoma.jpg (800x987, 99.34K)

Looks more like a cg render vs the actual ingame model, not an intentional change.

I will forever laugh at motion sickness subhumans and dress-up simulator trannies getting blown the fuck out by both Bloodlines 2 and Cyberpunk.

Absolutely.

but OP's pic is from a cgi trailer and this is an ingame model

>75%
I would revise that model user

Attached: bl2.webm (1280x720, 2.96M)

>those deep, Silvester Stallone eyes

Attached: 1522833983639.png (320x320, 113.62K)

YOU GET TO MEET CHRISTINA HENDRICKS IN THIS GAME???

>inb4 people defending this trash with "it's an rpg!!!"

Yes, abandon all hopes. Thank us later.

stats/skills/perks dictating accuracy for any kind of action RPG is such a dumb thing

This game I will only accept for free. It's too big a risk to spend money on such odds.

i agree

Attached: JCDenton2.png (432x454, 267.72K)

your loss user

Attached: 1581175391627.png (624x780, 579.26K)

Attached: 1581182698785.png (616x484, 572.11K)

>art book
will be made into an imgur album less than 24 hours after release
>commentary
uploaded to youtube
>all these skins
mods
>season passes
hrmmmmmm

This looks shit but consider the following:
- It was filmed on console and console controls are always for retards
- No auto-aim despite being on console
- Played by a video game journalist, the worst possible person at video games imaginable

No. The first one wasn't so great. As far as I know, there's a big chance this game will be 10x better than the first one since new games are good and old games are bad.

Yes.

Actual shilling? Not much respect for the presumed audience's intelligence too.

it was a dev playing

Attached: lol.webm (1240x698, 2.87M)

Hey, I remember that! Hahah, I remember that stuff!

No matter how good or bad this game will be, I'm pretty sure no mod support at launch or ever is guaranteed. That's, like, work.

Fucking sad.

>the worst possible person imaginable
fify