What went wrong?

What went wrong?

Attached: 1565715496941.png (512x512, 476.45K)

Too many wide-open spaces, enemies that are out of your sight can shoot you from across the map. But besides that it's pretty good

long as fucking fuck comparatively

Unironically too hard.

You could tell the game was playtested by people who had played the original HM to death aka the developers themselves

Windows

Nothing did, it improved on the original in every way possible, and is one of the best vidya filters of all time. We still have people crying and seething about windows and more open levels.

>people are crying about it being flawed therefore it's good

Except those aren't flaws, they just failed to adapt to the game because they were used to being able to steamroll everything in the game with a knife in HM1. HM2 actually makes you think and strategize in ways the (still amazing, mind you) original game just didn't.

Off-screen enemies
i swear to god the "peek" thing doesn't even go as far as they place some enemies

The fucking windows, and how you got shot before you could even see the enemies; HOWEVER, it was still fun. Honestly my biggest complaint is that getting a high score is simply just killing as fast as possible whereas in the first one switching weapons, plus executions is more satisfying.