Was the N64 actually weaker than the PS1?

Was the N64 actually weaker than the PS1?

Attached: mmlps1-n64-draw-distance.jpg (1968x786, 662.61K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=047f2VoMsxA
youtube.com/watch?v=o7KhVTXKE1Y
youtube.com/watch?v=zTAdXo-qW6c
youtube.com/watch?v=C1wffwowwng
youtube.com/watch?v=Tu1KM9HMpso
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

In some ways, yes
In others, no
N64 carts generally allowed for games to have much better load times but graphics took a hit without the power of a CD

Show me a single ps1 game that can even come close to conkers bad fur day

vagrant story, spyro 3, why does conker run like such shit?

>have Tony hawk for ps1
>neighbors get it for n64
>song loops early as fuck
>mfw

Attached: 1502242363511.jpg (247x353, 32.14K)

You can't do comparisons with a shitty port. The ports are from games built to the other system's strengths rather than its own. I'm sure if you ported SM64 or OoT to the PlayStation, it would look like fucking shit in comparison.

nintendo always produces fisher price tier game consoles.

I have no idea and I never really cared.

Pretty sure that's just because of the disk.

youtube.com/watch?v=047f2VoMsxA
youtube.com/watch?v=o7KhVTXKE1Y
how did n64 bros put up with this?

PS1 had smaller but more detailed levels
N64 had larger but less detailed levels

Also PS1 didnt have a Z-buffer and N64 slapped AA on everything which makes things better or worse depending on your opinion