Game made by swedes

>game made by swedes
>about history they didn't participate in
>they force weird social politics
Imagine my shock

Attached: 1586898808610.png (595x391, 307.48K)

thread is in case the jannies delete this one.
is is about video games.

eh, there are plenty of historical faggots, so I don't see why that's a big deal, as long as it's portrayed accurately and not some sunshine and rainbows bullshit
it'd make the game more interesting, like having to deal with your heir being a faggot, and people trying to usurp you because of it

>thread made by a fag
>about history he didn't participate in
>seething endlessly
Imagine my shock

>giving the player options bad

>be faggot king
>marry woman because expected
>have child because otherwise you'll get piked by your own people

Point is the game is using outrage to try and get free marketing. The swedes learned well from the kikes.

I'm sorry, do you think that Swedes didn't exist in the middle ages?

Or that there were no gay/asexual people in the middle ages?

As long as it doesn't ramble about how you're OWNING your bigoted parents or something like that, this could be an interesting mechanic. Imagine having to concieve a child while also maintaining an erotic relation with your steward

>crusader kings 3
>gay or bisexual characters
OP confirmed for never having played CK2.

Sounds pretty gay

There was a gay trait in ck2, idk about asexual though. It was a bad thing though, it fucked your reputation and made you unable to have an heir. Though of course, you didn't play it, you're just making a thread to complain about things you know nothing about

Are you talking about OP or PC Gamer?

>thread gets deleted and nigger op gets banned
>ban evades and creates a new one
really makes me hmmm

trans.
rights.

>bisexual characters
>CK2
Post the trait.

t. Didn't play CK2

Jannies are just gonna delete this again

>Even The Witcher 3's choice to make everyone white was defended as historically accurate, despite the fact that it's a fantasy game and wouldn't even be accurate if it wasn't. Thankfully, Paradox isn't using historical accuracy as an excuse to limit CK3, instead using it to add even more options and diversity.

Bisexual people are just retarded faggots, it's the same thing

>This time, they're not represented by traits, either, so heterosexuality isn't presented as the default. And while it doesn't treat sexual and romantic attraction as separate, sexual preference and sexual behaviour are dealt with independently. If you're part of a faith with strict rules about same-sex relationships, for instance, being gay isn't illegal, even if the sexual act is. By tweaking the game rules, you can also change all faiths' views on the subject, making same-sex relationships accepted everywhere.

>still unable to post the bi-/asexual CK2 trait

Only one of them is complaining.

>you have the option to start a game where being asexual is the most common. As well as being more diverse and welcoming

So there isn't one and you just make shit up? Got it.

Attached: (you).gif (480x238, 415.41K)

being homosexual and a hedonist allows you to seduce both genders

You're right, why cant I just get to the final level of a game when I first play it.
It's just more options after all and all options are a net positive.

history is a useless subject and i feel sorry for history teachers. imagine going through college learning useless shit that you'll never get to use outside of a classroom lmao

>Or that there were no gay/asexual people in the middle ages?
Yes they were no openly gay/asexual kings/dukes/counts in the middle ages correct.

yeah but it's paradox so every additional gender and orientation costs $15